This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg7l24yknwo
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Row continues over Cheadle houses built too high | |
(3 months later) | |
Nearby residents have been left unhappy after the new estate was built 2.4m (7.8 ft) higher than the original plans | Nearby residents have been left unhappy after the new estate was built 2.4m (7.8 ft) higher than the original plans |
A dispute over a housing estate that was built too high remains unresolved despite years of complaints from people living nearby. | A dispute over a housing estate that was built too high remains unresolved despite years of complaints from people living nearby. |
Residents living next to Persimmon Homes’ Pottery Gardens development in Cheadle, Staffordshire, said their homes were being overlooked after new houses were built on land that was raised 2.4m (7.8 ft) higher than expected. | Residents living next to Persimmon Homes’ Pottery Gardens development in Cheadle, Staffordshire, said their homes were being overlooked after new houses were built on land that was raised 2.4m (7.8 ft) higher than expected. |
The developer Persimmon has been in talks with neighbours about how to resolve the issue. | The developer Persimmon has been in talks with neighbours about how to resolve the issue. |
On Wednesday, Staffordshire Moorlands District Council's planning committee told the developer it had to go back and find a solution the neighbours would agree to. | On Wednesday, Staffordshire Moorlands District Council's planning committee told the developer it had to go back and find a solution the neighbours would agree to. |
Persimmon had applied to make changes to the estate’s original planning permission – which was granted in 2020 – by altering the site's layout and adding a retaining wall in between the estate and the neighbouring properties below. | Persimmon had applied to make changes to the estate’s original planning permission – which was granted in 2020 – by altering the site's layout and adding a retaining wall in between the estate and the neighbouring properties below. |
A previous attempt to alter their original plans was rejected in March 2023, and saw the developer sent back to meet with residents. | A previous attempt to alter their original plans was rejected in March 2023, and saw the developer sent back to meet with residents. |
Since then, it has only reached an agreement with some of the affected residents in Ness Grove and Ayr Road. | Since then, it has only reached an agreement with some of the affected residents in Ness Grove and Ayr Road. |
The planning committee said it was not satisfied with the prospect of a retaining wall being built in a piecemeal manner because Persimmon had not managed to bring all the residents on board. | The planning committee said it was not satisfied with the prospect of a retaining wall being built in a piecemeal manner because Persimmon had not managed to bring all the residents on board. |
The developer said it had been consulting extensively with residents | The developer said it had been consulting extensively with residents |
Chris Kershaw, development director at Persimmon Homes North West, told the committee the firm would continue its efforts to try to come up with a solution to the problem which all of the neighbouring residents would agree to. | Chris Kershaw, development director at Persimmon Homes North West, told the committee the firm would continue its efforts to try to come up with a solution to the problem which all of the neighbouring residents would agree to. |
Meanwhile, planning officer Ben Haywood told the committee the issue of floor levels had now been set, and could not be revisited - but Adrian Milward, one of the affected residents in Froghall Road, insisted this was central to the matter. | Meanwhile, planning officer Ben Haywood told the committee the issue of floor levels had now been set, and could not be revisited - but Adrian Milward, one of the affected residents in Froghall Road, insisted this was central to the matter. |
He said he was in the fourth year of his complaint against Persimmon, and called for an independent planning authority to look at the application. | He said he was in the fourth year of his complaint against Persimmon, and called for an independent planning authority to look at the application. |
“How can you build a storey higher on someone’s level boundary, and that be acceptable? It’s got to be reviewed," he said. | “How can you build a storey higher on someone’s level boundary, and that be acceptable? It’s got to be reviewed," he said. |
“We’re running a two-tier system here at the moment. Large developers are getting carte blanche and building what they want, local residents are working within the planning constraints.” | “We’re running a two-tier system here at the moment. Large developers are getting carte blanche and building what they want, local residents are working within the planning constraints.” |
Speaking last year, resident Tina Cross said people upstairs in the new homes were able to see her sitting on her bed. | Speaking last year, resident Tina Cross said people upstairs in the new homes were able to see her sitting on her bed. |
"The houses have been built too high and too close, invading our privacy," she said. | "The houses have been built too high and too close, invading our privacy," she said. |
Some residents on Ness Grove and Ayr Road have complained about being overlooked | Some residents on Ness Grove and Ayr Road have complained about being overlooked |
Committee chair Peter Wilkinson said: "As it stands we’re not happy with the proposals. | Committee chair Peter Wilkinson said: "As it stands we’re not happy with the proposals. |
"I think it needs to be deferred, and all the demands of the residents who have been affected – we need one solution." | "I think it needs to be deferred, and all the demands of the residents who have been affected – we need one solution." |
The committee voted to defer the application to allow Persimmon to continue talks with the residents. | The committee voted to defer the application to allow Persimmon to continue talks with the residents. |
This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations. | This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations. |
Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram. |
Previous version
1
Next version