This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/news/608374-australia-bans-children-social-media/
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Australia bars children under 16 from social media | Australia bars children under 16 from social media |
(about 1 hour later) | |
Tech companies will face fines if they fail to respect age restrictions on their services | Tech companies will face fines if they fail to respect age restrictions on their services |
The Australian parliament has approved a bill on barring children under 16 from using social media. The Senate passed the legislation on Thursday, after the House of Representatives did so the day before. | |
According to Australian public broadcaster ABC, the Social Media Minimum Age Bill defines an “age-restricted social media platform” as a service with a “sole purpose, or a significant purpose” to enable “online social interaction” between people, who can “post material” on the service. The legislation does not name any specific service, however. | |
Platforms that do not take “reasonable steps” to bar people under 16 would face fines of up to $50 million ($32.5 million USD). The new law will fully take effect in 12 months. | Platforms that do not take “reasonable steps” to bar people under 16 would face fines of up to $50 million ($32.5 million USD). The new law will fully take effect in 12 months. |
The government has argued that the law is necessary to better protect children’s wellbeing. | |
“Social media is doing harm to our children, and today as a direct result of our legislation passed through the parliament… parents can have a different discussion with their young ones,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told reporters. “We’ve got your back is our message to Australian parents.” | |
The prime minister dismissed concerns over the bill’s implementation. “We don’t argue that its implementation will be perfect, just like the alcohol ban for [those] under 18 doesn’t mean that someone under 18 never has access. But we know that it’s the right thing to do,” he said. | The prime minister dismissed concerns over the bill’s implementation. “We don’t argue that its implementation will be perfect, just like the alcohol ban for [those] under 18 doesn’t mean that someone under 18 never has access. But we know that it’s the right thing to do,” he said. |
Google and Meta have urged Australia to delay the bill until the age-verification trial is over. | |
“We are concerned about the process which rushed the legislation through while failing to properly consider the evidence, what industry already does to ensure age-appropriate experiences, and the voices of young people,” Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, said in a statement on Thursday. | |
Meta added that it expects “productive consultation on all rules associated with the bill to ensure a technically feasible outcome that does not place an onerous burden on parents and teens and a commitment that rules will be consistently applied across all social apps used by teens.” | Meta added that it expects “productive consultation on all rules associated with the bill to ensure a technically feasible outcome that does not place an onerous burden on parents and teens and a commitment that rules will be consistently applied across all social apps used by teens.” |
Snapchat’s parent company, Snap, released a statement, saying that “there are many unanswered questions about how this law will be implemented in practice.” The company also promised to “engage closely” with the Australian government. | Snapchat’s parent company, Snap, released a statement, saying that “there are many unanswered questions about how this law will be implemented in practice.” The company also promised to “engage closely” with the Australian government. |
Some Australian politicians and activists have criticized the legislation as incomplete. Senator Matt Canavan argued that the law “fails to address privacy concerns.” | |
“The attempt to ban kids from social media will be ineffective but worse it may undermine proper efforts to reign in the harms of social media,” Canavan wrote on X. | “The attempt to ban kids from social media will be ineffective but worse it may undermine proper efforts to reign in the harms of social media,” Canavan wrote on X. |
Many countries have been looking for ways to ensure that children navigate online platforms in a safe manner. In March 2024, the US state of Florida banned children under 14 from social media and required those aged 14 and 15 to get parental consent. | Many countries have been looking for ways to ensure that children navigate online platforms in a safe manner. In March 2024, the US state of Florida banned children under 14 from social media and required those aged 14 and 15 to get parental consent. |
Previous version
1
Next version