This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz6l0dynz7zo

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Expert denies he 'changed his mind' in Letby case Expert denies he 'changed his mind' in Letby case
(32 minutes later)
Lucy Letby is serving 15 whole-life jail terms for murdering seven babies and trying to kill seven others at the Countess of Chester HospitalLucy Letby is serving 15 whole-life jail terms for murdering seven babies and trying to kill seven others at the Countess of Chester Hospital
An expert witness has described criticisms of his evidence by Lucy Letby's lawyers as "unsubstantiated, unfounded, inaccurate".An expert witness has described criticisms of his evidence by Lucy Letby's lawyers as "unsubstantiated, unfounded, inaccurate".
On Monday, the former neonatal nurse's legal team revealed they would ask the Court of Appeal to immediately review all of her convictions.On Monday, the former neonatal nurse's legal team revealed they would ask the Court of Appeal to immediately review all of her convictions.
They alleged lead prosecution expert Dr Dewi Evans had altered his view about how three babies died at the Countess of Chester Hospital between 2015 and 2016.They alleged lead prosecution expert Dr Dewi Evans had altered his view about how three babies died at the Countess of Chester Hospital between 2015 and 2016.
In a statement, Mr Evans said he had neither received any formal notification of the announcement nor any correspondence from Letby's barrister Mark McDonald or his team.In a statement, Mr Evans said he had neither received any formal notification of the announcement nor any correspondence from Letby's barrister Mark McDonald or his team.
Mr Evans added: "Mr Mark McDonald's observations regarding my evidence is unsubstantiated, unfounded, inaccurate.
"His method of presenting his information reflects clear prejudice and bias.
"I find his style most unedifying, most unprofessional. It's highly disrespectful to the families of babies murdered and harmed by Lucy Letby."
Mr McDonald said he had "nothing to add" in response to Dr Evans's claims.
Dr Dewi Evans said criticisms of him by Lucy Letby's legal team were "unsubstantiated, unfounded, inaccurate"Dr Dewi Evans said criticisms of him by Lucy Letby's legal team were "unsubstantiated, unfounded, inaccurate"
Letby is serving 15 whole-life jail terms for murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others between June 2015 and June 2016.Letby is serving 15 whole-life jail terms for murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others between June 2015 and June 2016.
Mr McDonald told a news conference in London on Monday that Dr Evans had altered his view about how babies had died.Mr McDonald told a news conference in London on Monday that Dr Evans had altered his view about how babies had died.
He said: "Remarkably, Dr Evans has now changed his mind on the cause of death of three of the babies: Baby C, Baby I and Baby P.He said: "Remarkably, Dr Evans has now changed his mind on the cause of death of three of the babies: Baby C, Baby I and Baby P.
The barrister added: "Dr Evans had said to the jury that Lucy Letby had injected air down a nasal gastric tube and this had led to the death of the three babies.The barrister added: "Dr Evans had said to the jury that Lucy Letby had injected air down a nasal gastric tube and this had led to the death of the three babies.
"This was repeated to the Court of Appeal, who may have been misled when they ruled on the application for leave against the convictions.""This was repeated to the Court of Appeal, who may have been misled when they ruled on the application for leave against the convictions."
He said Dr Evans had "revised his opinion in relation to Baby C" and had written a new report which he had given to police months ago.He said Dr Evans had "revised his opinion in relation to Baby C" and had written a new report which he had given to police months ago.
But, he said "despite numerous requests" the prosecution had "yet to give this report to the defence".But, he said "despite numerous requests" the prosecution had "yet to give this report to the defence".
"The defence will argue that Dr Evans is not a reliable expert, and all the convictions are not safe," Mr McDonald said."The defence will argue that Dr Evans is not a reliable expert, and all the convictions are not safe," Mr McDonald said.
Letby was convicted in August 2023 and has twice been refused permission to appeal against her convictions.Letby was convicted in August 2023 and has twice been refused permission to appeal against her convictions.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said the court had previously rejected Letby's argument that expert witness evidence presented by the prosecution had been "flawed".The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said the court had previously rejected Letby's argument that expert witness evidence presented by the prosecution had been "flawed".
Dr Evans said: "The only place appropriate to deal with any potential appeal is the relevant court.Dr Evans said: "The only place appropriate to deal with any potential appeal is the relevant court.
"If required I would be pleased to give evidence in the usual way; on oath, subject to cross examination, and where my evidence is placed in the public domain.""If required I would be pleased to give evidence in the usual way; on oath, subject to cross examination, and where my evidence is placed in the public domain."
Mark McDonald said "despite numerous requests" the prosecution had "yet to give this [new] report to the defence"Mark McDonald said "despite numerous requests" the prosecution had "yet to give this [new] report to the defence"
Dr Evans highlighted notes in a report from the three Appeal Court judges.Dr Evans highlighted notes in a report from the three Appeal Court judges.
"They were supportive of my evidence," he said. "They supported the verdict of the Manchester trial unreservedly."They were supportive of my evidence," he said. "They supported the verdict of the Manchester trial unreservedly.
"I am not in receipt of any information that indicates that the Appeal Court judges were mistaken.""I am not in receipt of any information that indicates that the Appeal Court judges were mistaken."
He added he was "mindful" of two ongoing events.He added he was "mindful" of two ongoing events.
Firstly, the Thirlwall Inquiry, which is examining the circumstances surrounding Letby's crimes.Firstly, the Thirlwall Inquiry, which is examining the circumstances surrounding Letby's crimes.
Hearings in Liverpool will resume in January, with the public inquiry's findings expected in the autumn of 2025.Hearings in Liverpool will resume in January, with the public inquiry's findings expected in the autumn of 2025.
Secondly, Cheshire Police revealed earlier this month that detectives had interviewed Letby under caution in prison as part of its investigation into more baby deaths.Secondly, Cheshire Police revealed earlier this month that detectives had interviewed Letby under caution in prison as part of its investigation into more baby deaths.
Dr Evans said: "I believe we owe it to them also to complete their investigation without any distractions."Dr Evans said: "I believe we owe it to them also to complete their investigation without any distractions."
In response to Dr Evans's statement, Mr McDonald said: "Dr Evans has written a new report on Baby C, 12 months after Lucy Letby was convicted, please can this be disclosed to the defence?In response to Dr Evans's statement, Mr McDonald said: "Dr Evans has written a new report on Baby C, 12 months after Lucy Letby was convicted, please can this be disclosed to the defence?
"This issue of reliability of any prosecution medical expert is now a matter for the Court of Appeal and Criminal Cases Review Commissions but certainly the disclosure of this new report may help them in deciding this question.""This issue of reliability of any prosecution medical expert is now a matter for the Court of Appeal and Criminal Cases Review Commissions but certainly the disclosure of this new report may help them in deciding this question."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, external, X, external, and Instagram, external. You can also send story ideas to northwest.newsonline@bbc.co.uk, external and via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, external, X, external, and Instagram, external. You can also send story ideas to northwest.newsonline@bbc.co.uk, external and via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.