This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8r5nrzn4z0o

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Met Police officers cannot be sacked through vetting, court rules Met Police officers who fail vetting scheme may keep jobs
(32 minutes later)
Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said policing was in a "hopeless situation"Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said policing was in a "hopeless situation"
The Metropolitan Police cannot dismiss officers by removing their vetting clearance, the High Court has ruled. Policing has been left in a "hopeless position", Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said, after the High Court ruled the force could not dismiss officers by removing their vetting clearance.
Sgt Lino Di Maria launched a legal challenge against the force after he had his vetting removed when sexual assault allegations were made against him. He denies all allegations and has not been charged in connection with them. The ruling came after Sgt Lino Di Maria successfully mounted a legal challenge after having his vetting removed over sexual assault allegations, which he denies and has not been charged or convicted in connection with.
Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said the ruling had "left policing in a hopeless position" and the force were seeking leave to appeal. Sir Mark said it was "absurd" that officers who were not fit to hold vetting could not be lawfully sacked. He said the force would appeal.
London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan said the ruling had "significant implications for the work the Met is now doing to clean up the force". Mrs Justice Lang said the process was unlawful because officers suspected of wrongdoing were denied a proper opportunity to defend themselves.
In her ruling, Mrs Justice Lang said the "defendant's powers do not extend to the dismissal of a police officer by reason of withdrawal of vetting clearance". The ruling has huge implications for the ability of police chiefs to sack officers and is a major blow to Sir Mark's pledge to root out officers who he says should not be in the force.
"Dismissal is a matter which should be provided for in regulations made by the Secretary of State. This results in an anomalous situation where officers who do not have basic vetting clearance cannot be dismissed by the defendant." It comes after an independent report into the murder of Sarah Everard by police officer Wayne Couzens in March 2021 called for the police vetting procedures to be overhauled.
The judge ruled that the current regulations did not allow for officers to be sacked through a removal of vetting clearance and that was something which could be changed by the government. Met Police vetting is a background check on both new applicants and current officers - which include checks on criminal records, finances, and close associates - to identify unsuitable individuals.
'Acting rapidly'
Sgt Di Maria was found to have no case to answer in respect of misconduct allegations, and argued that having his vetting removed without the accusations being proved was a breach of his right to a fair trial.
In her ruling, Mrs Justice Lang said the Met's "powers do not extend to the dismissal of a police officer by reason of withdrawal of vetting clearance".
Her judgement stated that dismissal should be provided for in regulations from the Home Secretary, which they are currently not.
Mrs Justice Lang added: "This results in an anomalous situation where officers who do not have basic vetting clearance cannot be dismissed."
Following the ruling, a Home Office spokesperson said it was "acting rapidly" to ensure police forces could "dismiss officers who cannot maintain vetting clearance".Following the ruling, a Home Office spokesperson said it was "acting rapidly" to ensure police forces could "dismiss officers who cannot maintain vetting clearance".
London's Independent Victims' Commissioner Claire Waxman said the decision was a "significant blow" to the hard work of the Metropolitan Police to "root out dangerous officers and restore public trust and confidence, and the consequences should concern us all".
'Absurd''Absurd'
Speaking to reporters outside Scotland Yard, Sir Mark said: "We now have no mechanism to rid the Met of officers who were not fit to hold vetting - those who cannot be trusted to work with women, or those who cannot be trusted to enter the homes of vulnerable people.Speaking to reporters outside Scotland Yard, Sir Mark said: "We now have no mechanism to rid the Met of officers who were not fit to hold vetting - those who cannot be trusted to work with women, or those who cannot be trusted to enter the homes of vulnerable people.
"It is absolutely absurd that we cannot lawfully sack them."It is absolutely absurd that we cannot lawfully sack them.
"This would not be the case in other sectors where staff have nothing like the powers comparable to police officers.""This would not be the case in other sectors where staff have nothing like the powers comparable to police officers."
He added officers such as Sgt Lino Di Maria would remain on vetting special leave, and described the position as a "ridiculous waste of money" but the "least bad option".He added officers such as Sgt Lino Di Maria would remain on vetting special leave, and described the position as a "ridiculous waste of money" but the "least bad option".