This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/feb/18/venomous-attacks-on-the-attorney-general-are-undermining-the-rule-of-law

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Venomous attacks on the attorney general are undermining the rule of law Venomous attacks on the attorney general are undermining the rule of law
(4 months later)
A letter from Stephen Hockman KC and Sam Townend KC, former chairs of the Bar Council, and Christina Blacklaws and I Stephanie Boyce, former presidents of the Law SocietyA letter from Stephen Hockman KC and Sam Townend KC, former chairs of the Bar Council, and Christina Blacklaws and I Stephanie Boyce, former presidents of the Law Society
Recent press comment about the role of the attorney general, Richard Hermer, referred to in your article (‘Deeply unfair’: how attorney general became lightning rod for criticism of Starmer, 13 February), overlooks the principle that those representing parties in contentious litigation have the right, and indeed the duty, to put forward the case for their clients without fear or favour, so that, as and when appropriate, the court or tribunal can itself independently decide whether such a case is or is not valid.Recent press comment about the role of the attorney general, Richard Hermer, referred to in your article (‘Deeply unfair’: how attorney general became lightning rod for criticism of Starmer, 13 February), overlooks the principle that those representing parties in contentious litigation have the right, and indeed the duty, to put forward the case for their clients without fear or favour, so that, as and when appropriate, the court or tribunal can itself independently decide whether such a case is or is not valid.
As the great British advocate and judge Norman Birkett once pointed out in a radio talk about the art of advocacy, it is essential that a lawyer’s presentation of the case for a client is not perceived as an expression of the lawyer’s personal opinions. Not only would this be incorrect as a matter of fact, but it would also undermine our system of justice, under which the case for each side is fully and objectively presented before a decision is made by an impartial and independent tribunal.As the great British advocate and judge Norman Birkett once pointed out in a radio talk about the art of advocacy, it is essential that a lawyer’s presentation of the case for a client is not perceived as an expression of the lawyer’s personal opinions. Not only would this be incorrect as a matter of fact, but it would also undermine our system of justice, under which the case for each side is fully and objectively presented before a decision is made by an impartial and independent tribunal.
Against this background, it is sad indeed to see the deeply personal and indeed venomous attacks which have recently been launched against the attorney general and other lawyers – whether they have been advising or representing government, or others, or advancing a case in opposition to government.Against this background, it is sad indeed to see the deeply personal and indeed venomous attacks which have recently been launched against the attorney general and other lawyers – whether they have been advising or representing government, or others, or advancing a case in opposition to government.
Those who state or imply that, in doing this, the lawyers are advancing their own personal opinions, are doing immense and untold damage, not only to our legal system but to society as a whole. They are undermining the rule of law and opening a path towards a society in which the public no longer trust the legal system or the individuals who participate in it.Those who state or imply that, in doing this, the lawyers are advancing their own personal opinions, are doing immense and untold damage, not only to our legal system but to society as a whole. They are undermining the rule of law and opening a path towards a society in which the public no longer trust the legal system or the individuals who participate in it.
The fact that such developments are becoming more widespread around the world makes it all the more crucial that we should uphold the rule of law in our own country.Stephen Hockman KC and Sam Townend KCFormer chairs, Bar CouncilChristina Blacklaws and I Stephanie BoyceFormer presidents, Law Society The fact that such developments are becoming more widespread around the world makes it all the more crucial that we should uphold the rule of law in our own country.
Stephen Hockman KC and Sam Townend KC
Former chairs, Bar Council
Christina Blacklaws and I Stephanie Boyce
Former presidents, Law Society
Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.