This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyjv8e49deo

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Apple defeats shareholder effort to end DEI programmes Apple boss Tim Cook says DEI programmes may have to change
(about 1 hour later)
Apple has fended off a proposal asking the tech giant to consider ending its diversity practices, such as the use of race and sex in hiring decisions. Apple boss Tim Cook said his company may have to change its diversity practices as the US legal landscape shifts.
Apple said a majority of shareholders had rejected the measure, which the company had argued was "inappropriately" trying "to micromanage" its programmes and policies. His comments came just minutes after a majority of shareholders rejected a proposal calling on the tech giant to end its diversity policies, such as the use of race and sex in hiring decisions.
It marks a second high-profile defeat of a shareholder proposal targeting diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies at a major US company in recent weeks, after retailer Costco successfully beat back a similar push. Apple had urged shareholders to vote against the measure, which the company had argued was "inappropriately" trying "to micromanage" its business.
The votes come despite fierce criticism of DEI from US President Donald Trump, who has pushed to end such programmes throughout the federal government. The scrutiny of the firm comes as US President Donald Trump has called for an end to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programmes in the government and private sector.
Trump's orders have run into legal roadblocks, even as many companies in the US, including big names such as Meta, Amazon and Goldman Sachs, have already ended or rolled back their own policies, citing legal risks. Trump's orders have run into legal roadblocks, but many companies in the US, including big names such as Meta, Amazon and Goldman Sachs, have already ended or rolled back their own policies, citing legal risks.
The proposal at Apple was backed by National Center for Public Policy Research, a conservative think tank that was behind the proposal at Costco and has previously tangled with Apple over its green energy policies. Apple's decision to fight the shareholder proposal had bucked that tide.
The organisation argued that the existence of Apple's diversity and inclusion programmes exposed Apple to "litigation, reputational and financial risks", noting that recent lawsuits have made it easier for workers to sue over discrimination. Shareholder measures opposed by companies rarely succeed, so the outcome of Tuesday's vote was expected.
However, despite the vote, Mr Cook on Tuesday acknowledged that the firm may have to alter some of its practices.
"As the legal landscape around this issue evolves, we may need to make some changes to comply, but our north star of dignity and respect for everyone and our work to that end will never waver," Mr Cook said during a question-and-answer session at the company's annual shareholder meeting.
He noted that Apple did not use "quotas" for hiring - a practice that has come in for some of the fiercest criticism - while saying the firm's strength came from a culture where "people with diverse backgrounds and perspectives come together".
"We'll continue to work together to create a culture of belonging where everyone can do their best work," he added, saying the company would remain "committed to the values that have always made us who we are".
The proposal targeting DEI policies at Apple was backed by National Center for Public Policy Research, a conservative think tank, which had backed a similar proposal at Costco, which shareholders had also rejected.
It had argued that the existence of Apple's diversity and inclusion programmes exposed Apple to "litigation, reputational and financial risks", noting that recent lawsuits have made it easier for workers to sue over discrimination.
"If even only a fraction of employees file suit, and only some of those prove successful, the cost to Apple could reach tens of billions of dollars," it said."If even only a fraction of employees file suit, and only some of those prove successful, the cost to Apple could reach tens of billions of dollars," it said.
Stefan Padfield of the Free Enterprise Project, who presented the proposal at Tuesday's meeting, said the risks to the company had also increased after the Trump administration recently ordered staff to investigate DEI in the private sector. Stefan Padfield of the organisation's Free Enterprise Project, who presented the proposal at Tuesday's meeting, said the risks to the company had also increased after the Trump administration recently ordered staff to investigate DEI in the private sector.
"The vibe shift is clear," he said. "DEI is out and merit is in.""The vibe shift is clear," he said. "DEI is out and merit is in."
Shareholders also rejected proposals that would have required Apple to report about its AI privacy practices, charitable giving and policies to combat child sex abuse.Shareholders also rejected proposals that would have required Apple to report about its AI privacy practices, charitable giving and policies to combat child sex abuse.
They backed the board members supported by the company, as well as its executive compensation, including a pay package for Mr Cook worth more than $74m.