This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3ywlqx319o

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Trump accelerated UK military boost, says former defence chief Starmer and Badenoch clash over defence spending at PMQs
(about 4 hours later)
Troops took part in a Nato exercise in Romania this month PMQs: Leaders clash over defence spending increase
The decision to hike UK defence spending has been "accelerated" by President Donald Trump's actions on Ukraine, a former defence chief of staff has said. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has challenged Sir Keir Starmer over the hike in defence spending, after the PM said the rise amounted to £13.4bn.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced the UK would reallocate aid funds to boost military spending to 2.5% by 2027, following Trump's demand that all European allies increase their defence contributions. The PM announced the UK will reallocate aid funds to boost military spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, following President Trump's demand that all European allies increase their defence contributions.
Defence Secretary John Healey defended the decision, saying "hard power is now more important than soft power", despite an outcry from charities and aid groups. The decision comes as Sir Keir is set to fly to the US for talks with Trump in the White House, to discuss the war in Ukraine, later.
The decision comes as Sir Keir is set to fly to the US for talks with Trump in the White House, to discuss the war in Ukraine. Badenoch questioned Sir Keir over the exact amount, which Defence Secretary John Healey said could be calculated as £6bn when inflation was taken into account, and whether the Chagos deal would be funded from it.
General Sir David Richards, a former chief of defence staff, said the decision to raise defence spending over the next two years was a sound strategic move, but one that "almost certainly would not" be happening if not for Trump. At Prime Minister's Questions, Badenoch asked the prime minister which figure - his initial £13.4bn or £6bn, which Healey said was the increase "in real terms" - was correct.
Sir Keir responded: "If you take the numbers for this financial year and then the numbers for the financial year 2027-28, that's a £13.4bn increase.
"That's the largest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War which will put us in a position to ensure the security and defence of our country and of Europe."
Badenoch pressed him again, saying: "The IFS said today that the government is playing silly games with numbers. How does he find this difference in numbers?"
Repeating himself, the PM then said they had already been "going through the same question over and over again" at previous PMQs and said "if you ask again I'll give the same answer again", to loud cheers from his backbenchers.
Objecting, Badenoch pointed out that "being patronising is not the same as answering the question" and went on to ask whether any of the new funding would be going towards the multi-billion Chagos deal twice.
The UK plans to hand over the territory to Mauritius, but under the terms of the deal, the UK will continue to lease one of the islands, Diego Garcia, which contains a UK-US military airbase, for a period of 99 years.
The PM responded saying: "The Chagos deal is extremely important for our security and for US security... The funding I announced yesterday is for our capability to put ourselves in a position to rise to a generational challenge."
When Badenoch suggested Sir Keir had listened to her advice on using international aid money for defence, he said: "I'm going to have to let the leader of the opposition down gently... She didn't feature in my thinking at all.
"I was so busy over the weekend I didn't even see her proposal.
"She has appointed herself I think saviour of the western civilisation in a desperate search for relevance."
'Taking in inflation, it would be something over £6bn': Healey on the defence increase
Earlier, a former defence chief of staff said he believed the decision to hike UK defence spending has been "accelerated" by President Donald Trump's actions on Ukraine.
General Sir David Richards said the decision to raise defence spending over the next two years was a sound strategic move, but one that "almost certainly would not" be happening if not for Trump.
"It was going to happen, it's now been accelerated by Donald Trump's actions, and all of us, I think, would say not before time," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme."It was going to happen, it's now been accelerated by Donald Trump's actions, and all of us, I think, would say not before time," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
Praising Healey as a "forward-thinking, strategically-minded person", he added: "The one thing I've learned as a student of military history, but also from my own experience, you've got to keep close to America if you want to be genuinely credible in terms of deterring a potential aggressor.
"There is no way that Europe, at the moment, could worry Russia, for example."
Lord Richards stressed the British Army was currently "very hollowed out indeed" and suggested the "army isn't big enough" currently for British troops to be part of a rotation of European peacekeeping forces.Lord Richards stressed the British Army was currently "very hollowed out indeed" and suggested the "army isn't big enough" currently for British troops to be part of a rotation of European peacekeeping forces.
Questions have been raised about the Labour government's U-turn on its manifesto pledge to raise international development funding by 0.2% of GDP, with unease among some Labour MPs about the move.Questions have been raised about the Labour government's U-turn on its manifesto pledge to raise international development funding by 0.2% of GDP, with unease among some Labour MPs about the move.
Speaking at PMQs, Labour backbencher Diane Abbott suggested the decision could increase the risk of conflict abroad, telling the PM that "there is also a view that taking money from aid and development to spend on armaments and tanks makes people less safe, not more safe, because the desperation and poverty that so often leads to warfare is what aid and development money is supposed to counter."
The PM defended the decision in the chamber, and earlier Healey had said "hard power is now more important than soft power".
Asked whether the increase announced on Tuesday is linked to Sir Keir's visit to the White House, Healey told the Today programme: "President Trump, over the last two weeks, has been very direct in his challenge.Asked whether the increase announced on Tuesday is linked to Sir Keir's visit to the White House, Healey told the Today programme: "President Trump, over the last two weeks, has been very direct in his challenge.
"He's reinforced the imperative and the importance of Britain making this commitment and helping other European countries to step up in a similar way.""He's reinforced the imperative and the importance of Britain making this commitment and helping other European countries to step up in a similar way."
The US has been warning European leaders it wants to see a significant increase in their defence contributions to Nato for at least a decade.The US has been warning European leaders it wants to see a significant increase in their defence contributions to Nato for at least a decade.
Trump's rapprochement with Russia's Vladimir Putin, and the US siding with Russia on a UN resolution on Ukraine, has sent shockwaves through European allies.Trump's rapprochement with Russia's Vladimir Putin, and the US siding with Russia on a UN resolution on Ukraine, has sent shockwaves through European allies.
Asked whether he believed the UK increasing its defence contribution would bring Trump on side, Healey said: "I've never had any doubt that President Trump and the US administration... recognise that the UK is the US's closest defence and security ally - they've challenged us to help lead in Europe." Asked whether he believed the UK increasing its defence contribution would bring Trump on side, Healey said that the PM could now tell Trump: "You are challenging Europe and the UK to step up on European security, on Ukraine, on defence spending, on reinforcing our industrial base.
He added the PM could now tell Trump: "You are challenging Europe and the UK to step up on European security, on Ukraine, on defence spending, on reinforcing our industrial base.
"We are, and we will step up further.""We are, and we will step up further."
The UK would still spend £9bn on international aid, including in Gaza, Healey insisted, prioritising efforts to "deter conflicts that cause the biggest impact on many of the poorest countries".
However, the defence secretary said "the definition of defence numbers can be done in different ways" when pressed on whether Sir Keir's claim the 0.2% increase was worth £13.4bn every year.
Speaking to BBC Breakfast, he suggested the real-terms increase in defence spending is "something over £6bn" when taking inflation into account and the PM's £13.4bn figure was "the increase in hard cash that will be spent on defence in two years' time compared to what's being spent today".
However, shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge accused the government of having "serious questions to answer" as "now it appears that the figure is half of what Keir Starmer promised to Parliament yesterday".
Cartlidge said Labour needs "to be straight about the facts", adding: "We need transparency on these critical matters of national security."
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.