This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz7vvrx7vq4o

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
'Manipulative' Suffolk gardener conned customers out of £35k 'Manipulative' Suffolk gardener conned customers out of £35k
(about 2 hours later)
Adam Fox defrauded 12 clients while operating as Foxy Landscaping and Gardening MaintenanceAdam Fox defrauded 12 clients while operating as Foxy Landscaping and Gardening Maintenance
A "manipulative" rogue trader who conned his customers out of £35,000 has been given a suspended jail sentence and ordered to pay thousands of pounds in compensation.A "manipulative" rogue trader who conned his customers out of £35,000 has been given a suspended jail sentence and ordered to pay thousands of pounds in compensation.
Adam Fox, of Primrose Hill, in Haverhill, Suffolk, defrauded 12 clients while operating under the name Foxy Landscaping and Gardening Maintenance.Adam Fox, of Primrose Hill, in Haverhill, Suffolk, defrauded 12 clients while operating under the name Foxy Landscaping and Gardening Maintenance.
The 35-year-old had previously pleaded guilty to fraudulent trading by a sole trader between August 2021 and October 2022.The 35-year-old had previously pleaded guilty to fraudulent trading by a sole trader between August 2021 and October 2022.
At Ipswich Magistrates' Court, Fox was given a 12-month sentence, suspended for 24 months, and told he must repay more than £10,000 in compensation.At Ipswich Magistrates' Court, Fox was given a 12-month sentence, suspended for 24 months, and told he must repay more than £10,000 in compensation.
The court heard how Fox would ask customers for a 50% deposit, often totalling thousands of pounds ahead of carrying out any works.The court heard how Fox would ask customers for a 50% deposit, often totalling thousands of pounds ahead of carrying out any works.
The father-of-three would then either fail to complete the projects for which he had received payment or perform the tasks but to a "poor quality".The father-of-three would then either fail to complete the projects for which he had received payment or perform the tasks but to a "poor quality".
Fox, 35, of Primrose Hill, in Haverhill, was sentenced at Ipswich Magistrates' CourtFox, 35, of Primrose Hill, in Haverhill, was sentenced at Ipswich Magistrates' Court
One victim employed Fox to do £10,000 worth of work in her garden, which she asked to be completed by June 2022 in time for a prom event for her daughter.One victim employed Fox to do £10,000 worth of work in her garden, which she asked to be completed by June 2022 in time for a prom event for her daughter.
She paid a 50% deposit of about £5,000 upfront but said Fox would often leave early and the paving slabs he did lay turned out to be "faulty".She paid a 50% deposit of about £5,000 upfront but said Fox would often leave early and the paving slabs he did lay turned out to be "faulty".
His workmanship was described as being so bad that she ended up having to pay out £14,000 for the work to be rectified, which finally took place in January 2023.His workmanship was described as being so bad that she ended up having to pay out £14,000 for the work to be rectified, which finally took place in January 2023.
‘Embarrassed’‘Embarrassed’
On another occasion, after taking a large payment from a customer, he repeatedly told them the delivery of the materials required for the job had been delayed.On another occasion, after taking a large payment from a customer, he repeatedly told them the delivery of the materials required for the job had been delayed.
His customer, however, grew suspicious and visited the suppliers of the materials herself, before being informed Fox had never actually placed an order with them.His customer, however, grew suspicious and visited the suppliers of the materials herself, before being informed Fox had never actually placed an order with them.
The court was also told how another victim had been left feeling "stupid" and "angry at herself", having previously written articles about how to spot a rogue trader.The court was also told how another victim had been left feeling "stupid" and "angry at herself", having previously written articles about how to spot a rogue trader.
Another had told Suffolk Trading Standards they felt "embarrassed" after being scammed and "no longer trusted any tradespeople because of Fox's behaviour".Another had told Suffolk Trading Standards they felt "embarrassed" after being scammed and "no longer trusted any tradespeople because of Fox's behaviour".
'Failed miserably''Failed miserably'
The court was told Fox would make "numerous excuses" for delays or failing to finish the work, often saying his father had died or either his wife or son were in hospital.The court was told Fox would make "numerous excuses" for delays or failing to finish the work, often saying his father had died or either his wife or son were in hospital.
Customers had trusted Fox due to the fact his business was attached to about 400 positive reviews online – reviews they have since concluded must have been fake.Customers had trusted Fox due to the fact his business was attached to about 400 positive reviews online – reviews they have since concluded must have been fake.
During the hearing, it was said that Fox had claimed the business was "legit at the start" but "suffered a number of setbacks" due to his mental health and financial issues.During the hearing, it was said that Fox had claimed the business was "legit at the start" but "suffered a number of setbacks" due to his mental health and financial issues.
It was also said that Fox, who was told his business venture had "failed miserably" as he sat without emotion in the dock, had refunded some of the money to his victims.It was also said that Fox, who was told his business venture had "failed miserably" as he sat without emotion in the dock, had refunded some of the money to his victims.
"It was always going to catch up with him eventually," said Ms Laura Austin, representing Suffolk Trading Standards."It was always going to catch up with him eventually," said Ms Laura Austin, representing Suffolk Trading Standards.
After some of the customers received partial refunds, the total loss to victims was £20,000.
Fox is also required to complete 15 rehabilitation activity requirement days and 120 hours of unpaid work.Fox is also required to complete 15 rehabilitation activity requirement days and 120 hours of unpaid work.
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.