This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg19gx7vl4o

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Shabana Mahmood rejects sentencing changes after 'two-tier' claims Tories urge justice secretary to reverse 'two-tier' sentencing changes
(about 5 hours later)
The justice secretary has called for the scrapping of planned changes which would make the background of offenders from minority groups a bigger factor when deciding whether to jail them. Robert Jenrick has branded the planned changes "two-tier justice"
Shabana Mahmood called for the Sentencing Council to reverse course, after the Conservatives accused Labour of overseeing "two-tier justice", in which prison sentences are less likely for ethnic or faith minorities. The Conservatives have called for the government to reverse planned changes which would make the ethnicity or faith of an offender a bigger factor when deciding whether to jail them.
On Wednesday, the council - which is independent but sponsored by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) - published new guidelines for judges aimed at avoiding bias and cutting reoffending. The Sentencing Council, which issued the new guidance for England and Wales, is independent and ministers do not currently have the power to overrule it.
But Mahmood said she would write to its leaders to "register my displeasure and to recommend reversing" the change. But shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick told the BBC if necessary the law should be changed so the government could do so.
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood has said she will write to the council to "register my displeasure" and recommend reversing the change, after the Tories accused her of overseeing "two-tier justice".
"As someone who is from an ethnic minority background myself, I do not stand for any differential treatment before the law, for anyone of any kind," Mahmood said."As someone who is from an ethnic minority background myself, I do not stand for any differential treatment before the law, for anyone of any kind," Mahmood said.
"There will never be a two-tier sentencing approach under my watch.""There will never be a two-tier sentencing approach under my watch."
The Sentencing Council said the updated guidance would ensure courts had the "most comprehensive information available" to hand out an appropriate sentence and could address disadvantages faced within the criminal justice system.
Official figures show that offenders from ethnic minorities consistently get longer sentences than white offenders for indictable offences.
The updated sentencing guidance, which is due to come into force from April, places a greater emphasis on the need for pre-sentence reports for judges.The updated sentencing guidance, which is due to come into force from April, places a greater emphasis on the need for pre-sentence reports for judges.
Pre-sentence reports give judges details on the offender's background, motives and personal life before sentencing - then recommend a punishment and what would work best for rehabilitation.Pre-sentence reports give judges details on the offender's background, motives and personal life before sentencing - then recommend a punishment and what would work best for rehabilitation.
But over recent years their use has decreased.But over recent years their use has decreased.
Magistrates and judges will be advised to get a pre-sentence report before handing out punishment for someone of an ethnic or faith minority - alongside other groups such as young adults, abuse survivors and pregnant women.Magistrates and judges will be advised to get a pre-sentence report before handing out punishment for someone of an ethnic or faith minority - alongside other groups such as young adults, abuse survivors and pregnant women.
These factors are not an exhaustive list, the council said. A pre-sentence report can still be necessary if an individual does not fall into one of these cohorts.These factors are not an exhaustive list, the council said. A pre-sentence report can still be necessary if an individual does not fall into one of these cohorts.
In a social media post, shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said the new guidelines were biased "against straight white men". However, Jenrick said this was a "blanket approach" that in many cases could lead to lesser sentences for certain groups.
"Under Two-Tier Keir [Starmer] our justice system is set to have an anti-white and anti-Christian bias," he said. He argued this could undermine the principle of equality of treatment under the law.
Pre-sentence reports were "the first step to avoiding a prison sentence", he argued. The shadow justice secretary told BBC Radio 4's Today programme Mahmood had a representative at a meeting signing off the changes, who did not raise any objections.
Earlier on Wednesday, Jenrick told the House of Commons the changes were an "inversion of the rule of law" and would make "custodial sentence less likely for those 'from an ethnic minority, cultural minority, or faith minority community'". The previous Conservative government was also consulted on the sentencing changes when the council was considering reforms between November 2023 and February 2024.
Official figures show that offenders from ethnic minorities consistently get longer sentences than white offenders for indictable offences. Pressed over why the Conservatives did not challenge the planned changes when they were in power, Jenrick said "there was no direction or requirement by government" for the council to investigate the issue.
The previous government was also consulted on the sentencing changes when the council was considering reforms between November 2023 and February 2024. He added that draft guidance had adopted less of a blanket approach, only saying a judge may produce a pre-sentencing report, rather than requiring them to do so.
In the Commons, Mahmood dismissed Jenrick's claims - telling MPs there would never be a "two-tier sentencing approach" under "this Labour government". However, he said the justice secretary at the time, Alex Chalk, had branded the idea "ridiculous and patronising".
She waited several hours before announcing on social media that she had asked the Sentencing Council to undo the change. On Wednesday, Jenrick claimed the new guidelines were biased "against straight white men".
Prior to Mahmood's call for the changes to be scrapped, the Sentencing Council said the changes were aimed at ensuring courts got full details on the offender and ensuring consistency in sentencing. "Under Two-Tier Keir [Starmer] our justice system is set to have an anti-white and anti-Christian bias," he wrote on social media.
Analysis by the council has found offenders from some ethnic minority backgrounds are more likely to receive harsher sentences for drug offences. Shabana Mahmood says she will write to the Sentencing Council about the changes
Prison sentences have grown longer for ethnic minority offenders, driven in part by fewer pleading guilty, the council found. Sentencing Council chairman Lord Justice William Davis said the updated guidelines took into account "evidence of disparities in sentencing outcomes, disadvantages faced within the criminal justice system and complexities in circumstances of individual offenders".
Sentencing Council chairman Lord Justice William Davis said the updated guidelines would ensure courts had the "most comprehensive information available" to them before deciding on a punishment. He added: "Pre-sentence reports provide the court with information about the offender; they are not an indication of sentence."
He said they took into account "evidence of disparities in sentencing outcomes, disadvantages faced within the criminal justice system and complexities in circumstances of individual offenders".
The Prison Reform Trust said there were "very good reasons" for changes to sentencing guidelines.The Prison Reform Trust said there were "very good reasons" for changes to sentencing guidelines.
Mark Daly, the charity's deputy director, told Radio 4's The World Tonight: "It has always been a factor that has been on the mind of sentencers and in this guideline it is simply reflecting the fact that if we look at outcomes from sentencing, there is disproportionality.Mark Daly, the charity's deputy director, told Radio 4's The World Tonight: "It has always been a factor that has been on the mind of sentencers and in this guideline it is simply reflecting the fact that if we look at outcomes from sentencing, there is disproportionality.
"So we know already that if you are from a minority ethnic background you are more likely to receive a custodial sentence for an equivalent offence, particularly for certain types of offences such as drug offences, than you would if you were white.""So we know already that if you are from a minority ethnic background you are more likely to receive a custodial sentence for an equivalent offence, particularly for certain types of offences such as drug offences, than you would if you were white."
"It seems to me that this current dispute is a bit of a storm in a tea cup," he added. He added: "It seems to me that this current dispute is a bit of a storm in a tea cup."
In other reaction to the Sentencing Council's announcement, Janey Starling, co-director of feminist campaign group Level Up, said the changes were a "huge milestone" in the campaign to end imprisoning pregnant women and mothers. Meanwhile, the guidance also advises courts should avoid sending pregnant women, or those who have given birth in the last 12 months, to prison.
Liz Forrester, from the group No Births Behind Bars, said it finally recognised the "deadly impact" of prison on babies and pregnant women. The move was welcomed by campaigners, who said it finally recognised the "deadly impact" of prison on babies and pregnant women.