This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c87121e0j4yo

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Greenpeace ordered to pay hundreds of millions in damages to oil firm Greenpeace ordered to pay hundreds of millions in damages to oil firm
(33 minutes later)
The Water is Life protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline drew thousands of supporters across the US at their peakThe Water is Life protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline drew thousands of supporters across the US at their peak
A North Dakota jury has found Greenpeace liable for defamation, ordering it to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in damages to a Texas-based oil company. A North Dakota jury has found Greenpeace liable for defamation, ordering it to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in damages to a Texas-based oil company for its role in one of the largest anti-fossil fuel protests in US history.
Energy Transfer accused the environmental group of defamation, trespass, nuisance and civil conspiracy over its role in protests nearly a decade ago against the Dakota Access Pipeline. Energy Transfer accused the environmental group of defamation, trespass, nuisance and civil conspiracy over the protests nearly a decade ago against the Dakota Access Pipeline.
The lawsuit, filed in state court, accused Greenpeace of an "unlawful and violent scheme to cause financial harm to Energy Transfer". The lawsuit, filed in state court, argued that Greenpeace was behind an "unlawful and violent scheme to cause financial harm to Energy Transfer".
Greenpeace said last month it could be forced into bankruptcy if it was ordered to pay around $300m (£237m) in claimed damages, ending over 50 years of environmental activism.Greenpeace said last month it could be forced into bankruptcy if it was ordered to pay around $300m (£237m) in claimed damages, ending over 50 years of environmental activism.
Protests against the pipeline near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation drew thousands, but Greenpeace argued it did not lead the demonstration and that the lawsuit threatened free speech.Protests against the pipeline near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation drew thousands, but Greenpeace argued it did not lead the demonstration and that the lawsuit threatened free speech.
The nine-person jury reached a verdict after roughly two days of deliberating. The verdict was delivered in the Morton County courthouse in Mandan, North Dakota, about 100 miles (160km) north of where the protests took place. The nine-person jury reached a verdict on Wednesday after roughly two days of deliberating.
The case was heard at a court in Mandan, about 100 miles (160km) north of where the protests took place.
Trey Cox, a lawyer for Energy Transfer, said during closing arguments that Greenpeace's actions caused between $265m to $340m in damages. He asked the jury to award the company that amount, plus additional damages.
Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline gained international attention during President Donald Trump's first term, as Native American groups set up an encampment trying to block it from passing near Standing Rock.Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline gained international attention during President Donald Trump's first term, as Native American groups set up an encampment trying to block it from passing near Standing Rock.
The protests, which saw acts of violence and vandalism, started in April 2016 and ended in February 2017, when the National Guard and police cleared the demonstrators' site.The protests, which saw acts of violence and vandalism, started in April 2016 and ended in February 2017, when the National Guard and police cleared the demonstrators' site.
At the peak, over 10,000 protesters were on site. The group included more than 200 separate Native American tribes, hundreds of US military veterans, actors and political leaders - including the current health secretary, Robert F Kennedy, Jr.At the peak, over 10,000 protesters were on site. The group included more than 200 separate Native American tribes, hundreds of US military veterans, actors and political leaders - including the current health secretary, Robert F Kennedy, Jr.
During the five-week trial, jurors heard from Energy Transfer's co-founder and board chairman Kelcy Warren, who said in a video deposition that protesters had created "a total false narrative" about his company.During the five-week trial, jurors heard from Energy Transfer's co-founder and board chairman Kelcy Warren, who said in a video deposition that protesters had created "a total false narrative" about his company.
"It was time to fight back," he said."It was time to fight back," he said.
Energy Transfer's lawyer Trey Cox argued in court that Greenpeace had exploited the Dakota Access Pipeline to "promote its own selfish agenda". Energy Transfer's lawyer Mr Cox told the court that Greenpeace had exploited the Dakota Access Pipeline to "promote its own selfish agenda".
Lawyers for Greenpeace argued that the group was not the leader of the protests, but merely helped support "nonviolent, direct-action training" to protesters. Attorneys for Greenpeace argued that the group did not lead the protests, but merely helped support "nonviolent, direct-action training".
The lawsuit named Greenpeace USA, as well as its Washington DC-based funding arm Greenpeace Fund Inc and its Amsterdam-based parent group Greenpeace International. In response to the verdict, Greenpeace USA's senior legal adviser Deepa Padmanabha said in a statement that "lawsuits like this aimed at destroying our rights to peaceful protest and free speech".
The legal action named Greenpeace USA, as well as its Washington DC-based funding arm Greenpeace Fund Inc and its Amsterdam-based parent group Greenpeace International.
Energy Transfer had sued over the protests once before in 2017, arguing that demonstrators had violated a racketeering statute, an allegation more often made against organised crime cartels. But a judge dismissed that case.
Greenpeace has counter-sued Energy Transfer in Dutch court, claiming the oil firm is attempting to unfairly use the legal system to silence critics.
The lawsuit, filed earlier this month, seeks to recover all damages and costs.
Greenpeace International's general counsel Kristin Casper said in a statement on Wednesday that "Energy Transfer hasn't heard the last of us in this fight".
"We will not back down, we will not be silenced," she said.