This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/may/06/starmer-nuclear-watchdog-regulations-delays-reactors

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Starmer ignored nuclear watchdog when he blamed regulations for delays Starmer ignored nuclear watchdog when he blamed regulations for delays
(about 13 hours later)
Office for Nuclear Regulation told government that claims about reactor delays in press release were ‘not true’Office for Nuclear Regulation told government that claims about reactor delays in press release were ‘not true’
Keir Starmer ignored warnings from his nuclear safety watchdog that it was wrong to blame regulations for delays building new reactors when he launched a plan to revive the nuclear power industry.Keir Starmer ignored warnings from his nuclear safety watchdog that it was wrong to blame regulations for delays building new reactors when he launched a plan to revive the nuclear power industry.
The prime minister unveiled the nuclear renaissance strategy in February and said investment had slumped because the industry was “suffocated by regulations”.The prime minister unveiled the nuclear renaissance strategy in February and said investment had slumped because the industry was “suffocated by regulations”.
However, a document released under freedom of information law reveals that the UK’s Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) told the government in the run-up to the launch that claims about delays to nuclear power in a draft press release were “not true”. Despite this, the claims were repeated in the final release.However, a document released under freedom of information law reveals that the UK’s Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) told the government in the run-up to the launch that claims about delays to nuclear power in a draft press release were “not true”. Despite this, the claims were repeated in the final release.
ONR was asked to comment on a draft government announcement of a taskforce to speed up the regulation of nuclear power. It made four corrections to the draft, which was passed to the investigative journalism cooperative The Ferret, and shared with the Guardian.ONR was asked to comment on a draft government announcement of a taskforce to speed up the regulation of nuclear power. It made four corrections to the draft, which was passed to the investigative journalism cooperative The Ferret, and shared with the Guardian.
But none of ONR’s corrections were implemented when Starmer made the announcement on 6 February, under the headline “Government rips up rules to fire up nuclear power”.But none of ONR’s corrections were implemented when Starmer made the announcement on 6 February, under the headline “Government rips up rules to fire up nuclear power”.
The attack on nuclear regulations was part of Labour’s attempt to prove its growth credentials and coincided with it clipping the wings of the competition watchdog and hauling in regulators to demand they do more to boost the economy.The attack on nuclear regulations was part of Labour’s attempt to prove its growth credentials and coincided with it clipping the wings of the competition watchdog and hauling in regulators to demand they do more to boost the economy.
The draft release stated that three European regulatory regimes had reached different assessments of the design of the reactors being built at Hinkley Point C in Somerset, “leading to delays and increased costs”.The draft release stated that three European regulatory regimes had reached different assessments of the design of the reactors being built at Hinkley Point C in Somerset, “leading to delays and increased costs”.
ONR said this was “not accurate” and that it had refuted such claims before. “Our feeling is that linking regulatory factors into the increasing Hinkley Point C costs and timeframes isn’t true and the sentence doesn’t stand up,” it said.ONR said this was “not accurate” and that it had refuted such claims before. “Our feeling is that linking regulatory factors into the increasing Hinkley Point C costs and timeframes isn’t true and the sentence doesn’t stand up,” it said.
ONR also suggested that the new taskforce should look at not the “approval” but the “deployment” of new reactor designs. “The reactor approval process has no bearing on the overall speed of delivery, but rather construction,” it said.ONR also suggested that the new taskforce should look at not the “approval” but the “deployment” of new reactor designs. “The reactor approval process has no bearing on the overall speed of delivery, but rather construction,” it said.
Neither amendment was made in Starmer’s announcement, which reiterated the disputed wording in the draft. Two other changes suggested by ONR were also rejected.Neither amendment was made in Starmer’s announcement, which reiterated the disputed wording in the draft. Two other changes suggested by ONR were also rejected.
The energy company EDF predicted in 2007 that electricity from Hinkley Point C would be cooking Christmas turkeys in 2017. EDF said in January 2024 that the station might not be finished until 2031.The energy company EDF predicted in 2007 that electricity from Hinkley Point C would be cooking Christmas turkeys in 2017. EDF said in January 2024 that the station might not be finished until 2031.
The estimated total cost of building the plant has risen from £18bn in 2016 to £35bn in 2024. This could increase to £46bn when inflation is taken into account.The estimated total cost of building the plant has risen from £18bn in 2016 to £35bn in 2024. This could increase to £46bn when inflation is taken into account.
According to ONR, its assessment of the reactor design was completed in 2012 but construction did not start until 2017. Its regulation had not delayed building since then, it said.According to ONR, its assessment of the reactor design was completed in 2012 but construction did not start until 2017. Its regulation had not delayed building since then, it said.
Dave Cullen, who co-chairs a forum for ONR and campaign groups, described Starmer’s announcement as misleading.
Sign up to Business TodaySign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotion
Dave Cullen, who co-chairs a forum for ONR and campaign groups, described Starmer’s announcement as misleading.
“I’m shocked by the cynical and unprofessional approach of the government to this announcement,” said Cullen, who is independent of ONR. “It seems as though it would rather attack an imaginary problem than seriously consider how to approach energy security.”“I’m shocked by the cynical and unprofessional approach of the government to this announcement,” said Cullen, who is independent of ONR. “It seems as though it would rather attack an imaginary problem than seriously consider how to approach energy security.”
Andrew Blowers, an anti-nuclear campaigner and emeritus professor of social sciences at the Open University, accused Starmer of “ignorant prejudice” in blaming regulators for delays.Andrew Blowers, an anti-nuclear campaigner and emeritus professor of social sciences at the Open University, accused Starmer of “ignorant prejudice” in blaming regulators for delays.
ONR said the draft press release was “shared under a strict embargo just a few days before release, with an opportunity for ONR to make representations on accuracy.”ONR said the draft press release was “shared under a strict embargo just a few days before release, with an opportunity for ONR to make representations on accuracy.”
It added: “Dialogue about specific sections of the press release, and in some cases, representations made about the accuracy of sentences/sections is standard practice discussion between communications teams.”It added: “Dialogue about specific sections of the press release, and in some cases, representations made about the accuracy of sentences/sections is standard practice discussion between communications teams.”
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero did not address the rejection of ONR’s corrections. “ONR has been informed of the review and will provide an important source of expertise as it progresses,” a spokesperson said.The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero did not address the rejection of ONR’s corrections. “ONR has been informed of the review and will provide an important source of expertise as it progresses,” a spokesperson said.
An ONR spokesperson said: “We were fully briefed by the government on its intentions to set up the nuclear regulatory taskforce but would not expect to be consulted on its formation and membership. We did however provide comments on a government press release for their consideration.
“Nuclear safety and the protection of workers and the public will always be our priority, but we are committed to regulating in a way that supports cost-effective, efficient nuclear deployment and technological advancements.
“We have welcomed the creation of the taskforce and look forward to discussing all aspects of our regulation with the review team, understanding how our regulation can be improved further and considering ways to speed up the safe delivery of new nuclear projects.”