This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/world/africa/8380117.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Funds sue Liberia over 1978 debt Funds win on Liberia's 1978 debt
(about 10 hours later)
Two Caribbean-registered investment funds have launched a legal case in London against Liberia over a debt that dates back to 1978. A British court has ordered Liberia to pay two Caribbean-registered investment funds more than $20m (£12m) for a debt that dates back to 1978.
The firms, described as "vulture funds" by critics, are suing for more than $20m (£12m) - some 5% of the Liberian government's total budget this year. The sum awarded to the firms - described as "vulture funds" by critics - is equivalent to about 5% of the Liberian government's budget this year.
Liberia says it has no money to pay the debt back and has accused the firms of profiting from poverty.Liberia says it has no money to pay the debt back and has accused the firms of profiting from poverty.
The country is recovering from a 14-year civil war which ended in 2003. The country is recovering from a 14-year civil war that ended in 2003.
The details of the case are still unclear, but it is thought that Liberia borrowed $6.5m from the US-based Chemical Bank in 1978 and that debt may have been resold a number of times. The details of the case are still unclear, but it is thought Liberia borrowed $6.5m from the US-based Chemical Bank in 1978 and that debt may have been resold a number of times.
The two funds are requesting that London's High Court grant a summary judgement in the case - making Liberia liable for the debt without the need for a full hearing. The two funds requested London's High Court to grant a summary judgement in the case - making Liberia liable for the debt without the need for a full hearing.
'Tooth and nail' fight 'Tooth and nail'
In 2002 a New York court ruled that Liberia owed $18m - the current case is an attempt to collect that sum plus interest.In 2002 a New York court ruled that Liberia owed $18m - the current case is an attempt to collect that sum plus interest.
At the time of the New York case Liberia was wracked by civil war and did not offer a defence.At the time of the New York case Liberia was wracked by civil war and did not offer a defence.
Liberian Finance Minister Augustine Kpehe Ngafuan told the BBC's Network Africa programme the country could not afford to repay the debt. Liberia's legal advisers think that if the funds do succeed in collecting the money, they will make a very large profit.
"We're asking everybody, we are asking even the court not to grant them summary judgement. Let them go through the normal procedure," he said. Ahead of Thursday's ruling, Liberian Finance Minister Augustine Kpehe Ngafuan told the BBC's Network Africa programme the country could not afford to repay the debt.
"Our lawyers are going to work tooth and nail to battle this." "Our lawyers are going to work tooth and nail to battle this," he said.
He said he hoped that the international community would take action to make sure that "these people that survive on poverty do not thrive". He added that he hoped that the international community would take action to make sure that "these people that survive on poverty do not thrive".
UK activists are lobbying the government to change the law so such cases cannot be heard in UK courts.UK activists are lobbying the government to change the law so such cases cannot be heard in UK courts.
Nick Dearden, of Jubilee Debt Campaign, said: "This case is absolute proof that you can't tackle vultures by voluntary means. Nick Dearden, of Jubilee Debt Campaign, said: "Currently these companies don't have to tell us anything about themselves because they're registered in tax havens - they can just turn up in London and sue one of the poorest countries in the world."
"Currently these companies don't have to tell us anything about themselves because they're registered in tax havens - they can just turn up in London and sue one of the poorest countries in the world." He called the High Court's ruling "disappointing but not surprising".
Very little is known about the funds - Hamsah Investments and Wall Capital.Very little is known about the funds - Hamsah Investments and Wall Capital.
Hamsah was awarded more than $11m in a similar action against another poor country, Nicaragua. Hamsah was awarded more than $11m in a similar action against Nicaragua.
The BBC's economics correspondent Andrew Walker says vulture funds are controversial - especially when they target nations already receiving debt relief on what they owe to rich countries. BBC economics correspondent Andrew Walker says vulture funds are controversial - especially when they target nations already receiving debt relief on what they owe to rich countries.
Sometimes that debt relief is what frees the resources to pay creditors who take legal action, our correspondent says. Sometimes that debt relief frees the resources to pay creditors who take legal action, our correspondent says.
The solicitor representing Hamsah has not yet responded to requests for comments on the case.The solicitor representing Hamsah has not yet responded to requests for comments on the case.