This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/13/menendez-brothers-resentencing-trial

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Menendez brothers resentencing hearing to begin after months of delays Menendez brothers resentencing hearing to begin after months of delays
(about 1 hour later)
LA judge will decide whether Erik and Lyle Menendez should be freed after serving 30 years in prison for murder LA judge will decide whether Erik and Lyle Menendez should get chance at freedom after serving 30 years for murder
After months of delays, a hearing starts on Tuesday to decide whether Erik and Lyle Menendez should get a chance at freedom after serving nearly 30 years in prison for the double murder of their parents. Erik and Lyle Menendez will be back in court on Tuesday for a long-awaited hearing where a Los Angeles judge will decide whether the brothers should get a chance at freedom after serving nearly three decades in prison for the double murder of their parents in 1989.
A Los Angeles judge will preside over the resentencing hearing that is expected to last two days. If he shortens their sentences, the brothers would still need approval from the state’s parole board to get out of prison. They could then potentially go free on time served. The resentencing hearing, which is moving ahead after months of delays, is expected to last two days. If Judge Michael Jesic shortens their sentences, the brothers would still need approval from the state’s parole board to be released.
They were sentenced in 1996 to life in prison without the possibility of parole for murdering their father, Jose Menendez, and mother, Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills home in 1989. The brothers were 18 and 21 at the time of the killings. While defense attorneys argued the brothers acted out of self-defense after years of sexual abuse by their father, prosecutors said the brothers killed their parents for a multimillion-dollar inheritance. Erik, 54, and Lyle, 57, were convicted of first-degree murder in the shotgun killings of Jose Menendez, an entertainment executive, and Kitty Menendez, in 1996. They received a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Due to wildfires in the LA area, and disputes between LA prosecutors and defense attorneys, the hearings were delayed for months. Defense attorneys have argued the brothers, who were 18 and 21 at the time of the murders, killed their parents in self-defense after years of sexual abuse by their father, but prosecutors said the brothers wanted their multimillion-dollar inheritance and that they were not abused.
The case has captured the public’s attention for decades – and last year, the Netflix drama Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story and documentary The Menendez Brothers brought new attention to the case. Supporters of the brothers have flown in from across the country to attend rallies and hearings in the past few months. The brothers have long argued their innocence and have recently sought freedom through multiple legal avenues, including asking for a new trial in light of new evidence of their father’s abuse, a petition for clemency from the governor, and a request for resentencing. Their resentencing hearings have been delayed repeatedly since January amid the LA wildfires and disputes between the defense and prosecution.
The resentencing hearing will center on whether the brothers have been rehabilitated in prison and deserve a lesser sentence of 50 years to life. That would make them eligible for parole under California’s youthful offender law because they committed the crime under the age of 26. This week’s resentencing hearing will center on whether the brothers have been rehabilitated in prison and deserve a lesser sentence of 50 years to life. Under that sentence, they would be eligible for parole under California’s youthful offender law because they committed the crime while under the age of 26.
Their defense attorney, Mark Geragos, said in April he may ask the judge to reduce their charges to manslaughter, potentially allowing them to be immediately released. In April, Mark Geragos, the brothers’ high-profile defense attorney, said he planned to ask Jesic, the Los Angeles county judge, to reduce their charges to manslaughter, which could allow them to be released from prison immediately.
Geragos said last Friday that he plans to call at least seven family members to testify at the hearings. As in previous proceedings, the brothers will appear virtually. It was unclear if they will testify. Geragos said last Friday that he plans to call at least seven family members to testify at the hearings. As in previous proceedings, the brothers will appear virtually. It was unclear if they will testify. Supporters of the brothers who have flown in from across the country are expected to be in attendance.
Los Angeles county prosecutors will be arguing against the resentencing. They say the brothers have not taken complete responsibility for the crime. Prosecutors will likely reference the preliminary findings from a forensic psychologist who looked at whether the brothers pose a risk to society if released, an assessment ordered by the state parole board. The admissibility of the results in court have been a point of contention for the two sides, as they have not been made public, but the judge said last Friday that some parts can be included. Los Angeles county prosecutors are opposed to the resentencing, and will argue against doing so in court. They say the brothers have not taken complete responsibility for the crime. Prosecutors will likely reference the preliminary findings from a forensic psychologist who looked at whether the brothers pose a risk to society if released, an assessment ordered by the state parole board.
The previous LA county district attorney, George Gascón, had opened the door to possible freedom for the brothers last fall by asking a judge to reduce their sentences. His office said the case would have been handled differently today due to modern understandings of sexual abuse and trauma, and the brothers’ rehabilitation over three decades in prison. George Gascón, the progressive former Los Angeles county district attorney, had recommended the brothers be resentenced, which would have opened the door to their release. He said he believed the brothers were “subjected to a tremendous amount” of dysfunction and molestation, and said his office would have handled the case differently due to modern understandings of sexual abuse, and pointed to the brother’s rehabilitation during their decades behind bars. While in prison Erik and Lyle have earned college degrees and served as mentors and caregivers.
A resentencing petition laid out by Gascón focused on the brothers’ accomplishments and rehabilitation. The brothers’ attorneys say their clients have worked hard to better themselves and give back to the prison community. The extended Menendez family, with the exception of an uncle who died in March, has said they fully forgive the brothers for what they did and want them to be freed. The extended Menendez family, with the exception of an uncle who died in March, has said they fully forgive the brothers for what they did and want them to be freed.
Since their conviction, the brothers have gotten an education, participated in self-help classes and started various support groups for their fellow prisoners.
Sign up to Headlines USSign up to Headlines US
Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morningGet the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotion
The current district attorney, Nathan Hochman, reversed course from Gascón and opposed the brothers’ resentencing. The current district attorney, Nathan Hochman, quickly reversed course and said he was opposed to the brothers’ resentencing. He argued the brothers have not taken full responsibility for their crimes and his office has said it does not believe they were abused.
Hochman’s office has said it does not believe that the brothers were sexually abused by their father.
Prosecutors also say the brothers have not admitted to lying during their trial.Prosecutors also say the brothers have not admitted to lying during their trial.
Recently, they cited the forensic psychologist’s analysis that said the brothers had recently broken prison rules by smuggling cellphones inside, which Hochman argued demonstrated an inability to regulate their own behavior. It came to the conclusion that they were “moderately more likely” than others to engage in violence in the community, Hochman said.Recently, they cited the forensic psychologist’s analysis that said the brothers had recently broken prison rules by smuggling cellphones inside, which Hochman argued demonstrated an inability to regulate their own behavior. It came to the conclusion that they were “moderately more likely” than others to engage in violence in the community, Hochman said.
With Hochman in charge, prosecutors attempted twice to withdraw their office’s resentencing petition. Los Angeles county superior court judge Michael Jesic ruled both times that the resentencing hearings could continue despite their opposition. With Hochman in charge, prosecutors attempted twice to withdraw their office’s resentencing petition. Jesic ruled both times that the resentencing hearings could continue despite their opposition.
The judge could decide on the resentencing from the bench during the hearing or issue a written ruling later.The judge could decide on the resentencing from the bench during the hearing or issue a written ruling later.