This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jun/08/kemi-badenoch-women-burqas-constituency-surgery

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Kemi Badenoch says she will not speak to women in burqas at constituency surgery Kemi Badenoch says she does not speak to women in burqas at constituency surgery
(30 minutes later)
Tory leader says women can wear what they like and employers should be able to ban staff from wearing face coverings Tory leader says women can wear what they like, but that she asks people who attend her surgery to remove face coverings
The Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, has said she will not speak to women wearing burqas in her constituency surgery, and argued that employers should be able to ban their staff from wearing face coverings. Kemi Badenoch has said she will not speak to women wearing burqas in her constituency surgery, and argued that employers should be able to ban their staff from wearing face coverings.
Badenoch gave her view after the newest Reform MP, Sarah Pochin, triggered a debate over the subject by pressing the prime minister on whether he would follow the lead of other European countries such as France in banning the burqa. The Conservative leader gave her views after the newest Reform MP, Sarah Pochin, triggered a debate over the subject by pressing the prime minister on whether he would follow the lead of other European countries such as France in banning the burqa.
In an interview with the Sunday Telegraph, the Conservative leader said there were other things that were “more insidious”, like sharia courts, and that women should be able to wear what they like. Badenoch said an interview with the Sunday Telegraph that there were other things that were “more insidious”, such as sharia courts, and that women should be able to wear what they like.
But Badenoch added that if people come to her constituency surgery, she asks them to remove face coverings, whether they are balaclavas or burqas. She also said employers should be able to stop their staff wearing burqas if they want to. But she said that if people came to her constituency surgery, she asked them to remove face coverings, whether they were balaclavas or burqas. She also said employers should be able to stop their staff wearing burqas if they wanted to.
Reform’s decision to raise the issue, with Nigel Farage calling for a debate on the burqa, caused Zia Yusuf, the party’s chair, to resign. Reform’s decision to raise the issue and Nigel Farage’s call for a debate on the burqa prompted the party’s chair, Zia Yusuf, to resign.
However, he has since returned to Reform, saying he was not upset by the idea of banning the burqa and had just been exhausted and demoralised by racist abuse against him as a prominent Muslim politician. He has since returned, however, saying he was not upset by the idea of banning the burqa but had been exhausted and demoralised by racist abuse against him as a prominent Muslim politician.
Yusuf told the Sunday Times that he would possibly vote in favour of a burqa ban if given the opportunity but he thought there were more pressing issues facing the country. He is due to take up a portfolio of roles for Reform, including leading its Department of Government Efficiency unit looking at council spending where the party is in control. Yusuf told the Sunday Times he would possibly vote in favour of a burqa ban if given the opportunity, but that there were more pressing issues facing the country. He is expected to take up a portfolio of roles for Reform, including leading its government efficiency unit, which will look at spending by the councils the party controls.
The Reform focus on burqas on Friday caused leading Muslim groups and politicians to accuse the party of inflaming hostility towards Muslims. The Reform focus on burqas on Friday caused leading Muslim groups and politicians to accuse the party of inflaming hostility.
Its deputy leader, Richard Tice, has defended the decision to start a debate saying the issue cannot be “forced underground”. The party’s deputy leader, Richard Tice, has defended the decision to start a debate saying the issue cannot be “forced underground”.
Badenoch gave her view on the subject in an interview, in which she said she would not engage with people in her constituency who are wearing face coverings – whether burqas or balaclavas. Badenoch said in her interview: “If you were to ask me where you start with integration – sharia courts, all of this nonsense sectarianism, things like first-cousin marriage – there’s a whole heap of stuff that is far more insidious and that breeds more problems.
“If you were to ask me where you start with integration – sharia courts, all of this nonsense sectarianism, things like first-cousin marriage – there’s a whole heap of stuff that is far more insidious and that breeds more problems. “My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear.
“My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear.”
Sign up to First EditionSign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it mattersOur morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotion
She added: “If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it’s a burqa or a balaclava. “If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it’s a burqa or a balaclava.
“I’m not talking to people who are not going to show me their face, and I also believe that other people should have that control.“I’m not talking to people who are not going to show me their face, and I also believe that other people should have that control.
“Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear; it shouldn’t be something that people should be able to override.”“Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear; it shouldn’t be something that people should be able to override.”
Employers are able to set their own dress codes. They could face challenges under equality and human rights law if they restrict their staff from observing their religion through their clothing. However, rules can override this if they are proportionate and for a legitimate aim such as ensuring effective communication or for health and safety. Employers are able to set their own dress codes. They could face challenges under equality and human rights law if they were to restrict their staff from observing their religion through their clothing, but rules can override this if they are proportionate and for a legitimate aim such as ensuring effective communication or for health and safety.
Jack Straw, the former Labour home secretary, revealed in 2006 that he asked Muslim women wearing the burqa coming to his constituency surgeries if they would remove their face coverings, arguing that the conversation would be of greater value without it. The former Labour home secretary Jack Straw revealed in 2006 that he had asked women who came to his constituency surgeries if burqas to remove them, arguing that the conversation would be of greater value without a face covering.