This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/12/australian-government-downplays-natural-decision-by-pentagon-to-review-aukus-defence-pact
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Australian government downplays ‘natural’ decision by Pentagon to review Aukus defence pact | Australian government downplays ‘natural’ decision by Pentagon to review Aukus defence pact |
| (about 3 hours later) | |
| Australia’s defence minister says support for trilateral agreement still strong in Washington as former PM lists reasons to ‘remain confident’ | |
| Australia news live: latest politics updates | Australia news live: latest politics updates |
| Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast | Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast |
| Defence minister Richard Marles has downplayed the Trump administration’s review into the Aukus submarines program, as has former prime minister Scott Morrison, the architect of the pact. | |
| Marles said it was “natural” that the United States would examine the project but that he believed there was still strong support for the trilateral agreement in Washington DC. Morrison said the review was a departmental process rather than a policy decision, and should not be “over-interpreted”, but that Australia must “make the case” for the deal to survive. | |
| The Pentagon overnight announced it had launched a review of the Aukus agreement to make sure it is aligned with Trump’s “America first” agenda, throwing the defence pact with Britain and Australia into doubt. The review may trigger more allied anxiety over the future of the trilateral alliance designed to counter China’s military rise. | The Pentagon overnight announced it had launched a review of the Aukus agreement to make sure it is aligned with Trump’s “America first” agenda, throwing the defence pact with Britain and Australia into doubt. The review may trigger more allied anxiety over the future of the trilateral alliance designed to counter China’s military rise. |
| “The department is reviewing Aukus as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the president’s ‘America first’ agenda,” a Pentagon official said. “This means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs.” | |
| Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email | Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email |
| Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email | Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email |
| The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, discussed Aukus twice in phone calls with Trump in February and May, and the two are expected to meet next week at the G7 in Canada. Marles has met his counterpart, Pete Hegseth, twice, including a meeting last week where the US defence secretary urged Australia to significantly increase its military spending. | |
| Marles travelled to the US earlier this year to meet Hegseth, and make an $800m downpayment on the submarine project as part of an agreement to help increase the American submarine manufacturing capabilities. | |
| Concerns were raised about Trump’s commitment to Aukus in February when, after being asked by a reporter about it, the president replied: “What does that mean?” | Concerns were raised about Trump’s commitment to Aukus in February when, after being asked by a reporter about it, the president replied: “What does that mean?” |
| Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon’s under secretary of defense for policy, is leading the US review. Colby has repeatedly said he is “very sceptical” about Aukus and its benefits for the US. He has told the US Senate armed service committee that the US was not building enough submarines for its own defence and would not sell submarines to Australia if that might jeopardise American interests. | |
| Despite the review being announced overnight, Marles said he had experienced “clear and consistent support for Aukus” from the United States, and that Australia and the UK had been advised of the review. | Despite the review being announced overnight, Marles said he had experienced “clear and consistent support for Aukus” from the United States, and that Australia and the UK had been advised of the review. |
| “We are committed to Aukus and we look forward to working closely with the US on the review,” Marles said on Thursday. | “We are committed to Aukus and we look forward to working closely with the US on the review,” Marles said on Thursday. |
| “It is natural that the administration would want to examine this major undertaking including progress and delivery, just as the UK government recently concluded an Aukus review and reaffirmed its support including through the appointment of Sir Stephen Lovegrove as its Aukus adviser.” | “It is natural that the administration would want to examine this major undertaking including progress and delivery, just as the UK government recently concluded an Aukus review and reaffirmed its support including through the appointment of Sir Stephen Lovegrove as its Aukus adviser.” |
| Marles said on Thursday that he believed the United States had “shown clear and consistent support for Aukus.” | |
| “We look forward to continuing our close cooperation with the Trump administration on this historic project.” | |
| Morrison, in a statement shared on Thursday, said: “The focus of the review is not new and rightly centres on US submarine production rates. This is a known and genuine challenge for the US industrial base. This goes directly to the maintenance and expansion of the US submarine fleet, and it’s an area where Australia is already uniquely contributing under AUKUS Pillar I.” | |
| “As the Pentagon leads this review, the depth of US-Australia engagement, the professionalism of our collaboration, and the consistent backing from Secretary Hegseth, as reaffirmed in his discussions with Minister Marles, remain reasons for continued confidence. | |
| “Now is the time for Australia to make the case again. We have a good case to make in both our own interests and those of our AUKUS partners, especially in the US.” | |
| The shadow defence minister, Angus Taylor, said Albanese must seek to safeguard the Aukus arrangement by meeting Trump as soon as possible. | |
| “The Coalition supports AUKUS but it relies on trust. You can’t claim to be a reliable partner abroad while picking and choosing your principles at home. Australia cannot afford to be seen as a fair-weather friend. This government has sent mixed messages to our allies, and we’re now seeing the consequences,” he said. | |
| The Liberal treasurer Joe Hockey, who enjoyed a close relationship with Donald Trump, said the president was “transactional” . Hockey was ambassador between 2016 and 2020, during Trump’s first term in office. He told Radio National that Albanese’s expected meeting with the president next week would be crucial, and Australia had to “deeply engage” with the Trump administration. | |
| “Ultimately, it is really important that the prime minister and the president, when they meet next week, have a detailed discussion about not just Aukus but the broader trade relationship as well,” Hockey said. | |
| “President Trump is transactional. Look, every politician is transactional. The thing is that Donald Trump is overt about it. | |
| “And we have something to trade on: Aukus.” | |
| Democrat congressman Joe Courtney, the co-chair of the Friends of Australia Caucus – and self-described as Congress’s “leading Aukus supporter” – said unilaterally abandoning Aukus would make the US an unreliable and untrustworthy ally. | Democrat congressman Joe Courtney, the co-chair of the Friends of Australia Caucus – and self-described as Congress’s “leading Aukus supporter” – said unilaterally abandoning Aukus would make the US an unreliable and untrustworthy ally. |
| “To walk away from all the sunk costs invested by our two closest allies – Australia and the United Kingdom – will have far-reaching ramifications on our trustworthiness on the global stage and is a direct contradiction to the administration’s ‘America First, but not alone’ goal of countering aggression from China, Russia and other adversaries.” | “To walk away from all the sunk costs invested by our two closest allies – Australia and the United Kingdom – will have far-reaching ramifications on our trustworthiness on the global stage and is a direct contradiction to the administration’s ‘America First, but not alone’ goal of countering aggression from China, Russia and other adversaries.” |
| He said Aukus was in the US’s national interest, pointing to Australia’s US$3bn support to America’s shipbuilding industry. | He said Aukus was in the US’s national interest, pointing to Australia’s US$3bn support to America’s shipbuilding industry. |
| “To abandon Aukus – which is already well under way – would cause lasting harm to our nation’s standing with close allies and certainly be met with great rejoicing in Beijing,” Courtney said. | “To abandon Aukus – which is already well under way – would cause lasting harm to our nation’s standing with close allies and certainly be met with great rejoicing in Beijing,” Courtney said. |