This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jun/16/keir-starmer-biggest-u-turns-since-labour-came-to-power

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Keir Starmer’s biggest U-turns since Labour came to power Keir Starmer’s biggest U-turns since Labour came to power
(27 days later)
The prime minister has reversed his decision on a number of policy matters since winning the election From benefit cuts to foreign aid, the most striking about-turns since the prime minister took the reins
Keir Starmer’s mid-air announcement that he was reversing his previous opposition to a national grooming gangs inquiry is the latest in a long line of U-turns that have led allies to worry about a lack of political direction. Downing Street’s announcement on Friday that the government is dropping some of its cuts to disability benefits is the latest in a long series of U-turns that have led allies to worry about a lack of political direction.
Before he became prime minister, the Labour leader gained a reputation for U-turning on some of his most significant policies, including spending £28bn a year on green infrastructure and abolishing tuition fees. Before he became prime minister, Keir Starmer gained a reputation for changing course on some of his most significant policies, including spending £28bn a year on green infrastructure and abolishing tuition fees.
Since entering government, the pattern has continued, with Starmer having changed his mind on cuts to winter fuel payments and the grooming gangs inquiry within the last few weeks. Since entering government, the pattern has continued, with the Labour leader having changed his mind on cuts to winter fuel payments and a national grooming gangs inquiry within the last few weeks.
Here is a list of the biggest policy U-turns – or prospective U-turns – that the prime minister has executed since taking power. Here are the biggest policy U-turns – or prospective U-turns – that the prime minister has carried out since taking power.
Benefit cuts
For months ministers have talked about the importance of getting the cost of welfare payments down, for fiscal reasons and, in their words, “moral” ones, arguing that making it harder to claim disability benefits would encourage people back into work.
That was not enough to persuade nearly a third of the parliamentary Labour party, and more than 120 MPs signed a “wrecking” amendment to the government’s welfare bill that would have paused it indefinitely.
The prime minister has now relented, accepting changes that will see the cuts applied to new claimants only and agreeing to expand and accelerate the government’s back-to-work schemes.
Grooming gangs inquiryGrooming gangs inquiry
When Elon Musk began furiously tweeting about the grooming gangs scandal in January, the prime minister responded robustly. Faced with calls from Kemi Badenoch and other Conservatives for a national inquiry, Starmer accused them of “calling for inquiries because they want to jump on a bandwagon of the far right”.When Elon Musk began furiously tweeting about the grooming gangs scandal in January, the prime minister responded robustly. Faced with calls from Kemi Badenoch and other Conservatives for a national inquiry, Starmer accused them of “calling for inquiries because they want to jump on a bandwagon of the far right”.
But at the same time that Starmer was accusing his opponents of jumping on bandwagons, his government was appointing Louise Casey to lead an “audit” into how wide-scale the problem was. This decision was to pave the way for the U-turn that followed. But at the same, Starmer’s government was appointing Louise Casey to lead an “audit” into how wide the problem was. This decision paved the way for the U-turn that followed.
Sources say Lady Casey began her work believing that a national inquiry was unnecessary. But she changed her mind, and when Starmer read her report last week he realised he had little option but to change his position and accept her recommendation. Sources say Casey began her work believing that a national inquiry was unnecessary. But she changed her mind, and when Starmer read her report in early June he realised he had little option but to change his position and accept her recommendation.
Winter fuel paymentWinter fuel payment
The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, described her decision last year to cut winter fuel payments for 10 million pensioners as “necessary”, “urgent” and “responsible” after discovering what she said was a £22bn black hole in the public finances. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, described her decision last year to cut winter fuel payments for 10 million pensioners as necessary, urgent and responsible after discovering what she said was a £22bn black hole in the public finances.
Just under a year later, Starmer sounded a very different note when unravelling the policy for the vast majority of people.Just under a year later, Starmer sounded a very different note when unravelling the policy for the vast majority of people.
“I recognise that people are still feeling the pressure of the cost of living crisis, including pensioners,” he said. “That is why we want to ensure that as we go forward, more pensioners are eligible for winter fuel payments.”“I recognise that people are still feeling the pressure of the cost of living crisis, including pensioners,” he said. “That is why we want to ensure that as we go forward, more pensioners are eligible for winter fuel payments.”
Ministers stressed the U-turn had been made possible because of the strengthening economy. But on several measures, including growth forecasts and government debt levels, the economy was in no better position than it had been when the policy was first announced.Ministers stressed the U-turn had been made possible because of the strengthening economy. But on several measures, including growth forecasts and government debt levels, the economy was in no better position than it had been when the policy was first announced.
National insuranceNational insurance
Labour’s 2024 manifesto was plain-speaking in its tax offer to voters. “We will not increase national insurance, the basic, higher, or additional rates of income tax, or VAT,” the party promised.Labour’s 2024 manifesto was plain-speaking in its tax offer to voters. “We will not increase national insurance, the basic, higher, or additional rates of income tax, or VAT,” the party promised.
So when Reeves used her first budget to raise national insurance by 1.2 percentage points and to reduce the threshold at which companies start paying it, the decision looked like a fairly straightforward violation of the pre-election promise. So when Reeves used her first budget to raise national insurance by 1.2 percentage points and to reduce the threshold at which companies start paying it, the decision looked like a fairly clear violation of the pre-election promise.
Ministers argued it should not be counted as such, given the manifesto also said Labour would not raise taxes on “working people”, and that it was employers rather than employees that were being asked to pay higher tax rates.
This did not persuade Paul Johnson, the director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, however, who called the move a “straightforward breach” of the manifesto.
Sign up to First EditionSign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it mattersOur morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotion
Ministers argued it should not be counted as such, given the manifesto also said Labour would not raise taxes on “working people”, and that it was employers rather than employees that were being asked to pay the higher tax rates.
That did not persuade Paul Johnson, the director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, however, who called the move a “straightforward breach” of the manifesto.
International aidInternational aid
Labour went into the election promising to restore aid funding to 0.7% of gross national income “as soon as fiscal circumstances allow” after the Conservatives cut it in 2021.Labour went into the election promising to restore aid funding to 0.7% of gross national income “as soon as fiscal circumstances allow” after the Conservatives cut it in 2021.
There was no talk of potentially cutting development spending even further. But in February that is exactly what the prime minister announced, removing nearly half the development budget to pay for extra spending on defence and taking British aid spending to the lowest level in history.There was no talk of potentially cutting development spending even further. But in February that is exactly what the prime minister announced, removing nearly half the development budget to pay for extra spending on defence and taking British aid spending to the lowest level in history.
Even while making the cut, Starmer insisted he wanted to bring levels back to what they were before 2021 when he was able. Even while making the cut, Starmer insisted he wanted to bring levels back to pre-2021 levels when he was able.
But officials admit there is no prospect of this happening in the foreseeable future, as reflected by the recent comments by the aid minister, Jenny Chapman, who said: “The days of viewing the UK government as a global charity are over.”But officials admit there is no prospect of this happening in the foreseeable future, as reflected by the recent comments by the aid minister, Jenny Chapman, who said: “The days of viewing the UK government as a global charity are over.”
GenderGender
In March 2022, Starmer told the Times: “A woman is a female adult, and in addition to that, trans women are women, and that is not just my view – that is actually the law.”In March 2022, Starmer told the Times: “A woman is a female adult, and in addition to that, trans women are women, and that is not just my view – that is actually the law.”
The following year he told the Sunday Times that 99.9% of women “of course haven’t got a penis”, adding that he did not want to turn the issue into a “toxic divide”.The following year he told the Sunday Times that 99.9% of women “of course haven’t got a penis”, adding that he did not want to turn the issue into a “toxic divide”.
That stance changed, however, after the supreme court ruled that the Equality Act was referring only to biological sex when using the terms “woman” and “sex”.That stance changed, however, after the supreme court ruled that the Equality Act was referring only to biological sex when using the terms “woman” and “sex”.
In the days after that ruling, Starmer’s official spokesperson was asked whether the prime minister still believed trans women were women. “No,” he said. “The supreme court judgment has made clear that when looking at the Equality Act, a woman is a biological woman.”In the days after that ruling, Starmer’s official spokesperson was asked whether the prime minister still believed trans women were women. “No,” he said. “The supreme court judgment has made clear that when looking at the Equality Act, a woman is a biological woman.”