This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jun/17/watch-out-hallucinating-humphreys-about-in-whitehall
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Watch out, hallucinating Humphrey’s about in Whitehall | Watch out, hallucinating Humphrey’s about in Whitehall |
(2 days later) | |
Government AI tool | Management euphemisms | Unreliable LLMs | The unplugging test | Double checking | ‘To bot’ | Government AI tool | Management euphemisms | Unreliable LLMs | The unplugging test | Double checking | ‘To bot’ |
I doubt that government officials consulted their AI tool, Humphrey, on what it should be called (UK government rollout of Humphrey AI tool raises fears about reliance on big tech, 15 June). It could have advised that in the 1970s the name was used for a milk marketing campaign: “Watch out, there’s a Humphrey about.” That line will now have a whole new meaning. Having spent the last few weeks voting in the Lords to try, in vain, to achieve protections for the creative industries from AI abuse, that meaning might be prophetic. On a personal level, my husband is angry that his name is being stolen again.Sue MillerLiberal Democrat, House of Lords | |
Your report (The ‘death of creativity’? AI job fears stalk advertising industry, 9 June) quotes the chief executive of a big ad agency saying “AI will disintermediate a large number of jobs”. I asked an AI tool to put this into plain English. Ten minutes later, it’s still thinking about it. Perhaps absurd management euphemisms is one area where the human brain can still cut through the crap more effectively than AI?Neil ColeHemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire | |
Heather Stewart says large language models, while destroying creative jobs and careers, “remain prone to casually making things up” (Policymakers who think AI can help rescue flagging UK economy should take heed, 15 June). Could her article spur MPs into taking meaningful legislative action to protect their own positions?Jonathan J RossSheffield | |
Re Heather Stewart’s article, I’m not a specialist, but has anyone tried unplugging AI, going for a walk and then going back to check what’s happened? If the door’s locked, we’ve had it.Gavin GreenwoodBrighton | |
To check one AI’s “hallucination” flaws, can we not use another AI to check what the first AI has produced, and possibly made up?Alan WorsleyHull | |
As the English language still seems to lack a verb meaning “to generate something via AI”, might I suggest “to bot”? This would provide a quick means of asking whether someone really did the work themselves or just botted it.Edmund DoraghSchwäbisch Gmünd, Germany | |
Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section. | Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section. |