This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/17/cory-booker-pesticide-act
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Cory Booker pitches bill to allow lawsuits against pesticide makers over ‘toxic products’ | Cory Booker pitches bill to allow lawsuits against pesticide makers over ‘toxic products’ |
| (30 minutes later) | |
| Pesticide Injury Accountability Act would ensure that Bayer, Syngenta and others can be held responsible for allegedly causing health issues | Pesticide Injury Accountability Act would ensure that Bayer, Syngenta and others can be held responsible for allegedly causing health issues |
| US politics live – latest updates | US politics live – latest updates |
| Cory Booker on Thursday introduced legislation that would create a federal “right of action”, allowing people to sue pesticide makers such as Bayer and Syngenta, and others, for allegedly causing health issues such as cancer and Parkinson’s disease. | Cory Booker on Thursday introduced legislation that would create a federal “right of action”, allowing people to sue pesticide makers such as Bayer and Syngenta, and others, for allegedly causing health issues such as cancer and Parkinson’s disease. |
| The Pesticide Injury Accountability Act would “ensure that pesticide manufacturers can be held responsible for the harm caused by their toxic products”, according to a summary of the bill. The legislation would be amended to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act of 1972 (FIFRA). | The Pesticide Injury Accountability Act would “ensure that pesticide manufacturers can be held responsible for the harm caused by their toxic products”, according to a summary of the bill. The legislation would be amended to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act of 1972 (FIFRA). |
| If passed, the law would turn the tables on efforts by Bayer and a coalition of agricultural organizations as they push for state-by-state legislation blocking individuals from being able to file lawsuits accusing the companies of failing to warn of the risks of their products. The industry has also been pushing for federal preemptive protections against litigation. | If passed, the law would turn the tables on efforts by Bayer and a coalition of agricultural organizations as they push for state-by-state legislation blocking individuals from being able to file lawsuits accusing the companies of failing to warn of the risks of their products. The industry has also been pushing for federal preemptive protections against litigation. |
| So far, two states – Georgia and North Dakota – have passed what critics call “liability shield” laws. The laws essentially declare that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has oversight of pesticide labeling and state laws cannot permit companies to be held liable for failing to go beyond what the EPA requires in warning customers of potential risks. | So far, two states – Georgia and North Dakota – have passed what critics call “liability shield” laws. The laws essentially declare that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has oversight of pesticide labeling and state laws cannot permit companies to be held liable for failing to go beyond what the EPA requires in warning customers of potential risks. |
| Booker’s proposed law would not invalidate the state laws, but would give individuals an alternative – the right to bring their injury claims in federal courts if they can’t bring them in state courts. | |
| “Rather than providing a liability shield so that foreign corporations are allowed to poison the American people, Congress should instead … ensure that these chemical companies can be held accountable in federal court for the harm caused by their toxic products,” Booker said in a statement accompanying the announcement of the bill. | “Rather than providing a liability shield so that foreign corporations are allowed to poison the American people, Congress should instead … ensure that these chemical companies can be held accountable in federal court for the harm caused by their toxic products,” Booker said in a statement accompanying the announcement of the bill. |
| So far, 17 environmental, public health and consumer groups have endorsed the measure, including leaders in the Make America Health Again (Maha) movement. | So far, 17 environmental, public health and consumer groups have endorsed the measure, including leaders in the Make America Health Again (Maha) movement. |
| Zen Honeycutt, founder of Moms Across America and a supporter of Booker’s legislation, said it is “unconscionable that corporations are pushing our elected officials to manipulate laws that protect their profits over the health and safety of Americans”. She noted that many pesticides used widely in the US are banned in other countries because of their health risks. | Zen Honeycutt, founder of Moms Across America and a supporter of Booker’s legislation, said it is “unconscionable that corporations are pushing our elected officials to manipulate laws that protect their profits over the health and safety of Americans”. She noted that many pesticides used widely in the US are banned in other countries because of their health risks. |
| The summary of the bill names both Germany-based Bayer and the Chinese-owned Syngenta as key targets and says they and others are seeking “liability shields because they know the harm their products have already caused”. | The summary of the bill names both Germany-based Bayer and the Chinese-owned Syngenta as key targets and says they and others are seeking “liability shields because they know the harm their products have already caused”. |
| Bayer bought Monsanto in 2018 and inherited a mass of lawsuits involving close to 200,000 plaintiffs in the United States alone, all alleging that the company should have warned users that its glyphosate-based weed killing products, such as the popular Roundup brand, could cause cancer. The company has already paid out billions of dollars in settlements and jury awards, but still faces roughly 67,000 lawsuits. | Bayer bought Monsanto in 2018 and inherited a mass of lawsuits involving close to 200,000 plaintiffs in the United States alone, all alleging that the company should have warned users that its glyphosate-based weed killing products, such as the popular Roundup brand, could cause cancer. The company has already paid out billions of dollars in settlements and jury awards, but still faces roughly 67,000 lawsuits. |
| Likewise, Syngenta is facing several thousand lawsuits from people alleging that its paraquat weed killing products cause Parkinson’s disease and that Syngenta should have warned users of evidence that chronic exposure could cause the incurable brain disease. The company has so far paid out well over $100m to settle cases before they go to trial, and is attempting to solidify a broad settlement of the majority of the cases. | Likewise, Syngenta is facing several thousand lawsuits from people alleging that its paraquat weed killing products cause Parkinson’s disease and that Syngenta should have warned users of evidence that chronic exposure could cause the incurable brain disease. The company has so far paid out well over $100m to settle cases before they go to trial, and is attempting to solidify a broad settlement of the majority of the cases. |
| Bayer and its allies argue that their pesticide products, which are widely used in farming, are not only safe but are necessary for food production. Costly lawsuits jeopardize the availability of pesticides for agriculture, they say. | Bayer and its allies argue that their pesticide products, which are widely used in farming, are not only safe but are necessary for food production. Costly lawsuits jeopardize the availability of pesticides for agriculture, they say. |
| Bayer did not provide a comment directly about Booker’s bill, but said the “future of American farming depends on reliable science-based regulation of important crop protection products – determined safe for use by the EPA”. | |
| The company has asserted in its litigation defense that it should not be subject to failure-to-warn claims because such claims are preempted by federal law. The company says that if it did place cancer risk warnings on product labels it would conflict with provisions of FIFRA that give the EPA oversight of labeling language. The EPA says that glyphosate herbicides are “not likely” to be carcinogenic. | |
| Bayer said Thursday it wants to see federal legislation to “ensure that states and courts do not take a position or action regarding product labels at odds with congressional intent, federal law and established scientific research and federal authority”. | |
| “Farmers and consumers need to not only be able to trust the regulation of the products they use but trust that the government has made decisions based on agreed-upon and established science, facts, and data,” Bayer said. | |
| Syngenta said Booker’s bill “targets American food security” and that farmers do not deserve an “attack on the products they rely on”. The company said American agriculture is “highly regulated, productive and safe”, and that its paraquat products specifically, have not been shown to cause Parkinson’s disease. | Syngenta said Booker’s bill “targets American food security” and that farmers do not deserve an “attack on the products they rely on”. The company said American agriculture is “highly regulated, productive and safe”, and that its paraquat products specifically, have not been shown to cause Parkinson’s disease. |
| This story is co-published with the New Lede, a journalism project of the Environmental Working Group | This story is co-published with the New Lede, a journalism project of the Environmental Working Group |