This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/01/labor-mps-pro-palestine-march-gaza-protest-sydney-harbour-bridge

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Five Labor MPs defy NSW premier and vow to attend pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge Decision delayed for pro-Palestine protest on Sydney Harbour Bridge as police warn of possible crowd crush
(about 5 hours later)
ALP MLC Stephen Lawrence criticises ‘slow and steady demonisation of protest’ in NSW Group’s lawyers say demonstration ‘cannot be stopped’ as Christian-led group protesting antisemitism plans rally for same day
Australian activists allege they were ‘brutalised psychologically’ after Israeli military detained Gaza aid boatAustralian activists allege they were ‘brutalised psychologically’ after Israeli military detained Gaza aid boat
Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates
Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcastGet our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast
Several New South Wales Labor MPs have defied their premier, Chris Minns, by vowing to march across Sydney Harbour Bridge in support of Gaza this weekend as police attempt to challenge the protest in court. Pro-Palestine protesters will have to wait until Saturday to find out if they can legally march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge this weekend, but organisers are vowing to go ahead regardless of the court decision.
Labor’s Stephen Lawrence, Anthony D’Adam, Linda Voltz, Cameron Murphy and Sarah Kaine were among 15 NSW politicians who signed an open letter on Thursday evening calling on the government to facilitate “a safe and orderly event” on Sunday. However, the court heard the protest organisers are willing to postpone the march if police agree to work with them.
Police were due to oppose the protest in the NSW supreme court on Friday afternoon. If successful, that move would strip protesters of certain legal protections and leave them vulnerable to arrest if they decided to proceed with a so-called “unauthorised” march. The Palestine Action Group faced the New South Wales police in the supreme court on Friday after the police rejected an application to facilitate the protest.
“The most important point that I’m going to make to the court in these proceedings is that this application is not about whether the protest is occurring or not,” the group’s barrister, Felicity Graham, told the court, which will hand down its decision at 10am on Saturday.
“I have the firmest of instructions that Palestine Action Group are proceeding with this protest … It cannot be stopped.”
Graham said her argument was not to threaten the court, but to point out “the police have no choice” and there was no evidence prohibiting the protest would increase public safety.
“The intention to march, irrespective of an immunity, is grounded in a belief that the situation is one of profound moral urgency and that the time is now,” she said.
If the court sides with police and protesters proceed with a so-called “unauthorised” march, the police can exercise the full suite of their move-on powers. If the court authorises it, attendees will have immunity from being charged under the Summary Offences Act.
Outside the court, prior to the hearing, spokesperson for the group, Josh Lees, told reporters the offer still stands to delay the protest by up to three weeks if the police were willing to work with them.
The court heard around 50,000 people are expected to attend – the same estimated to have marched across the bridge for World Pride in 2023.
The police’s barrister Lachlan Gyles argued what was being asked was “unprecedented” in terms of the “risk, the lack of time to prepare, and, of course, the location, which is one of the main arteries in one of the largest cities in the world”.
He said there was not enough time to prepare a traffic management plan, and also warned of the potential for crowd crush.
“There’s been no liaison whatsoever any of the agencies and government authorities who would be involved, most particularly Transport New South Wales,” he said.
He also said the court should be concerned about being seen to “condone” certain behaviours if there are “violent scenes” as the court heard of plans for a counter-protest near the bridge’s tunnel.
A Christian-led group called Never Again is Now said they had lodged an application with the NSW police to hold a rally on Sunday outside the Sydney Harbour Tunnel. The protest is designed to draw attention to hostages still unaccounted for after Hamas’s attack on Israel on 7 October 2023.
Acting assistant police commissioner, Adam Johnson, who gave evidence, was asked by Graham what police would do if tens of thousands of people turned up on Sunday.
Johnson responded: “We would do our best in the circumstances to maintain public safety to the general public and to the people attending that location as well, and it would be difficult in either case.”
Lees, who became emotional at one point while giving his evidence, told the court the only thing he sees stopping the starvation and “genocide” is “people power”.
“We are not here to seek confrontation with police … we want to work with them to make this [a] successful event,” he said.
The hearing comes after several NSW Labor MPs defied their premier, Chris Minns, by vowing to attend the march.
Labor’s Stephen Lawrence, Anthony D’Adam, Lynda Voltz, Cameron Murphy and Sarah Kaine were among 15 NSW politicians who signed an open letter on Thursday evening calling on the government to facilitate “a safe and orderly event” on Sunday.
Sign up: AU Breaking News emailSign up: AU Breaking News email
Sign up to Morning Mail
Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Lawrence said the state’s “slow and steady demonisation of protest” risked repeating the events which led to Sydney’s first Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras march in 1978 being met with police violence.Lawrence said the state’s “slow and steady demonisation of protest” risked repeating the events which led to Sydney’s first Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras march in 1978 being met with police violence.
In a statement posted on Facebook on Friday, Lawrence criticised “the passage of laws that allow police to be used to end protests the government doesn’t like”.In a statement posted on Facebook on Friday, Lawrence criticised “the passage of laws that allow police to be used to end protests the government doesn’t like”.
“We have seen in these respects one long, unprincipled capitulation to reactionary politics and it is dangerous,” the Labor MLC said.“We have seen in these respects one long, unprincipled capitulation to reactionary politics and it is dangerous,” the Labor MLC said.
“I am a member of the Labor party, not the Liberal party. Our party is founded on protest and collective action. Attending is my way of sending a message that, in my view, we need to change course.”“I am a member of the Labor party, not the Liberal party. Our party is founded on protest and collective action. Attending is my way of sending a message that, in my view, we need to change course.”
Lawrence said while the circumstances of the protest were “not ideal”, the event had become “absolutely inevitable”, which he said was “largely because of the way it has been mishandled”.Lawrence said while the circumstances of the protest were “not ideal”, the event had become “absolutely inevitable”, which he said was “largely because of the way it has been mishandled”.
He said he wanted to attend Sunday’s march to express his “utter revulsion” at Israel’s actions – which he said other countries, including Australia, had provided cover for.He said he wanted to attend Sunday’s march to express his “utter revulsion” at Israel’s actions – which he said other countries, including Australia, had provided cover for.
The other NSW parliamentarians who signed the letter calling on the government to allow the march over the Harbour Bridge were independents Alex Greenwich and Jacqui Scruby and the Greens’ Jenny Leong, Tamara Smith, Kobi Shetty, Sue Higginson, Cate Faehrmann, Abigail Boyd and Amanda Cohn. Libertarian John Ruddick was also on the list.The other NSW parliamentarians who signed the letter calling on the government to allow the march over the Harbour Bridge were independents Alex Greenwich and Jacqui Scruby and the Greens’ Jenny Leong, Tamara Smith, Kobi Shetty, Sue Higginson, Cate Faehrmann, Abigail Boyd and Amanda Cohn. Libertarian John Ruddick was also on the list.
Greenwich, the state MP for Sydney, said he shared the “widespread community horror” over what was happening in Gaza and said marching across the bridge would send a powerful message of solidarity.Greenwich, the state MP for Sydney, said he shared the “widespread community horror” over what was happening in Gaza and said marching across the bridge would send a powerful message of solidarity.
“Having successfully lobbied the previous Coalition government to allow a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge in support of LGBTQ equality during Sydney WorldPride, I know it can be done,” he said in a statement.“Having successfully lobbied the previous Coalition government to allow a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge in support of LGBTQ equality during Sydney WorldPride, I know it can be done,” he said in a statement.
On Tuesday afternoon, the deputy police commissioner Peter McKenna announced the force had rejected an application from the protest organisers proposing a route across the Harbour Bridge to the US consulate, citing safety risks as the reason.
He said police were open to negotiating alternative routes.
However, the protest organisers, the Sydney-based Palestine Action Group, said in a statement that the protest “must go ahead” and vowed to fight in court for their right to stage a protected protest.
The premier on Friday morning said he expected “everybody in NSW to respect the outcome of the court’s decision”.The premier on Friday morning said he expected “everybody in NSW to respect the outcome of the court’s decision”.
Sign up to Morning Mail
Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
“I acknowledge there’s a lot of people in Sydney, in NSW, that want to be part of a protest,” Minns told reporters. “They’re very concerned about what’s happening in Gaza to Palestinians and they want to be heard.”“I acknowledge there’s a lot of people in Sydney, in NSW, that want to be part of a protest,” Minns told reporters. “They’re very concerned about what’s happening in Gaza to Palestinians and they want to be heard.”
Minns said people who were planning to participate in the protest would still have “every opportunity to be heard” even with an alternative route. Earlier in the week, he suggested a march over the bridge would cause the city to “descend into chaos”. Minns said people who were planning to participate in the protest would still have “every opportunity to be heard”, even with an alternative route. Earlier in the week, he suggested a march over the bridge would cause the city to “descend into chaos”.
The acting police commissioner, Peter Thurtell, said the protest organisers were “well aware” the force did not support their plans.
“They know that we are an organisation that they can trust and that we will facilitate their marches, but it just won’t be going over the Sydney Harbour Bridge,” he said on Friday.
“We’re obviously assessing what happens after the supreme court hearing, in terms of the number of police that we will utilise.”
Thurtell said if the bridge was cut off, more than 40,000 vehicles would be stopped, resulting in a disruption lasting more than six hours.
“There are lots of things that need to go into place in order for us to facilitate what the organisers have said is a one-hour operation,” he told reporters. “There is no way it’s a one-hour operation for the police.”
Sydney’s weekly pro-Palestine rallies have typically involved marches through the CBD.
A march across the Harbour Bridge could still go ahead on Sunday if the court sides with police but protesters could face being arrested under anti-protest laws if they obstructed traffic, for example.
There is a pedestrian footpath across the bridge on its eastern side.