This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/football/2025/aug/04/fifa-multibillion-pound-compensation-claim-former-players-transfer-regulations

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Fifa facing multibillion-pound compensation claim from former players Fifa facing multibillion-pound compensation claim from former players
(32 minutes later)
Claim relates to finding of unlawful transfer regulationsClaim relates to finding of unlawful transfer regulations
Group says about 100,000 players seeking moneyGroup says about 100,000 players seeking money
Fifa is facing a multibillion-pound claim for compensation from a group of former players after last year’s ruling by the European court of justice (CJEU) that its transfer rules are unlawful. Fifa is facing a multibillion-pound claim for compensation from a group of former players after last year’s ruling by the European court of justice (CJEU) that its transfer rules are unlawful. The Justice for Players foundation, a Dutch group that has the former England assistant manager Franco Baldini on its board, has served notice of its intention to file a class action against Fifa and the football associations of France, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and Denmark.
The Justice for Players foundation, a Dutch group that has the former England assistant manager Franco Baldini on its board, has served notice of its intention to file a class action against Fifa and the football associations of France, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and Denmark. Justice for Players is seeking compensation on behalf of players who have lost income because of Fifa’s transfer rules since 2002. It says the legal case will involve about 100,000 players.
Justice for Players is seeking compensation on behalf of players who have lost income because of Fifa’s transfer rules since 2002. It says the legal case will involve about 100,000 players and is worth billions. The claim will be filed in the district court of Midden Nederland, with the Netherlands chosen as the jurisdiction because Dutch law permits claims from anyone who has worked within the European Union and the United Kingdom.
The Football Association is understood to have been sent a copy of the letter before action. Although not named as a defendant, it could be added later. Fifa and the five domestic FAs have been given until September to respond.
The compensation claim is the result of the CJEU judgment last October in the case brought by former Chelsea and France midfielder Lassana Diarra, who sued Fifa after the world governing body refused to issue him with an international transfer certificate (ITC) to join the Belgian club Charleroi in 2016 after he was found to have breached his contract with Lokomotiv Moscow two years earlier.
Download the Guardian app from the iOS App Store on iPhone or the Google Play store on Android by searching for 'The Guardian'.Download the Guardian app from the iOS App Store on iPhone or the Google Play store on Android by searching for 'The Guardian'.
If you already have the Guardian app, make sure you’re on the most recent version.If you already have the Guardian app, make sure you’re on the most recent version.
In the Guardian app, tap the Menu button at the bottom right, then go to Settings (the gear icon), then Notifications.In the Guardian app, tap the Menu button at the bottom right, then go to Settings (the gear icon), then Notifications.
Turn on sport notifications.Turn on sport notifications.
The claim will be filed in the district court of Midden-Nederland, with the Netherlands chosen as the jurisdiction beacuse Dutch law permits claims from anyone who has worked within the European Union and the United Kingdom. Fifa fined Diarra €10.5m and suspended him from football for 15 months for breaching his contract, in a ruling upheld on appeal at the court of arbitration for sport. After blocking his registration at Charleroi, Fifa was then hit with a counterclaim from Diarra, with the CJEU ruling that its transfer regulations were unlawful.
The Football Association is understood to have been sent a copy of the letter before action. Although not named as a defendant, it could be added at a later date. Fifa and the five domestic FAs have been given until September to respond.
The compensation claim is the result of the CJEU judgment last October in the case brought by former Chelsea and France midfielder Lassana Diarra, who sued Fifa after the world governing body refused to issue him with an international transfer certificate (ITC) to join the Belgian club Charleroi in 2016 after he was found to have breached his contract with Lokomotiv Moscow two years earlier.
Fifa fined Diarra €10.5m and suspended him from football for 15 months for breaching his contract, in a ruling upheld on appeal at the court of arbitration for sport. After blocking his registration at Charleroi, Fifa was then hit with a counterclaim from Diarra, with the CJEU ruling last year that its transfer regulations were unlawful.
The CJEU found that the Fifa regulations on the status and transfer of players infringed EU competition law and the right to free movement of workers. Fifa has amended its transfer regulations, although the new rules have not been accepted by the international players’ union, Fifpro.
The Justice for Players foundation is understood to have been set up this year with the intention of bringing a mass legal action.
Diarra’s lawyer, Jean-Louis Dupont, who won the landmark case at the CJEU on behalf of Jean-Marc Bosman which established the principle of free movement for players out of contract in 1995, is advising Justice for Players.
Sign up to Football DailySign up to Football Daily
Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of footballKick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football
after newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotion
The CJEU found that the Fifa regulations on the status and transfer of players infringed EU competition law and the right to free movement of workers. Fifa has amended its transfer regulations, although the new rules have not been accepted by the international players’ union, Fifpro.
The Justice for Players foundation is understood to have been set up this year with the intention of bringing a mass legal action.
Diarra’s lawyer, Jean-Louis Dupont, who won the landmark case at the CJEU on behalf of Jean-Marc Bosman that established the principle of free movement for players out of contract, in 1995, is advising Justice for Players.
The legal letter sent to Fifa makes reference to the class action being a multibillion claim. This figure is understood to be based on independent analysis from economists at Compass Lexecon, who have estimated that players would have earned about 8% more over their careers since 2002 had Fifa’s transfer regulations not been unlawfully restrictive.The legal letter sent to Fifa makes reference to the class action being a multibillion claim. This figure is understood to be based on independent analysis from economists at Compass Lexecon, who have estimated that players would have earned about 8% more over their careers since 2002 had Fifa’s transfer regulations not been unlawfully restrictive.
The CJEU judgment ruled that Fifa’s regulations restricted free movement by establishing unlawful criteria for determining compensation to be paid by a player who breaks their contract, allowing the national federation of the former club to withhold a player’s ITC, making the player’s new club liable for the compensation to be paid to the former club and allowing Fifa to impose disciplinary sanctions on the player and their new club.The CJEU judgment ruled that Fifa’s regulations restricted free movement by establishing unlawful criteria for determining compensation to be paid by a player who breaks their contract, allowing the national federation of the former club to withhold a player’s ITC, making the player’s new club liable for the compensation to be paid to the former club and allowing Fifa to impose disciplinary sanctions on the player and their new club.
Fifa has been contacted for comment.Fifa has been contacted for comment.