This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy3ngr2n3vo

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Erin Patterson: Allegations mushroom murderer tried to kill her husband aired Erin Patterson: Allegations mushroom murderer tried to kill her husband aired
(about 3 hours later)
Watch: Australia’s mushroom murder case... in under two minutes Watch: Police release interview with Australian mushroom murderer
Convicted triple-murderer Erin Patterson allegedly tried to repeatedly poison her husband, including with cookies she claimed their daughter had baked him, a court has heard.Convicted triple-murderer Erin Patterson allegedly tried to repeatedly poison her husband, including with cookies she claimed their daughter had baked him, a court has heard.
The Australian woman was last month found guilty of murdering three relatives - and attempting to kill another - with a toxic mushroom-laced beef Wellington.The Australian woman was last month found guilty of murdering three relatives - and attempting to kill another - with a toxic mushroom-laced beef Wellington.
The 50-year-old was originally charged with three counts of attempted murder against her estranged husband Simon Patterson, but these charges were dropped on the eve of her trial. The 50-year-old was originally charged with three counts of attempted murder against her estranged husband Simon Patterson, but these charges were dropped without explanation on the eve of her trial.
The details of the allegations - which Patterson denied - were suppressed to protect the proceedings, but can now be made public for the first time. The details of the allegations, which Patterson denied, were suppressed to protect the proceedings, but can now be made public for the first time.
Three people died in hospital in the days after the lunch on 29 July 2023: Patterson's former in-laws, Don Patterson, 70, and Gail Patterson, 70, as well as Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, 66.Three people died in hospital in the days after the lunch on 29 July 2023: Patterson's former in-laws, Don Patterson, 70, and Gail Patterson, 70, as well as Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, 66.
Local pastor Ian Wilkinson – Heather's husband – recovered after weeks of treatment in hospital. Mr Patterson had also been invited to the lunch but pulled out at the last minute. Local pastor Ian Wilkinson – Heather's husband – recovered after weeks of treatment in hospital.
Pre-trial hearings, which are standard before many trials, allow parties and judges to determine what evidence is admissible - or allowed to be presented to a jury. In this case, as the charges relating to Mr Patterson were dropped, his evidence on the matter was excluded. In lengthy pre-trial hearings last year, Mr Patterson had detailed what he suspected was a years-long campaign to kill him with tainted food - including one episode which had left him so ill he spent weeks in a coma and his family was twice told to say their goodbyes.
In lengthy hearings last year, he had detailed what he suspected was a years-long campaign to kill him with tainted food, which had repeatedly put him in hospital. Camping trips and packed lunches
The court heard that one poisoning attempt left Mr Patterson so ill he spent weeks in a coma and his family was told to say their goodbyes twice. In a quiet moment during the early days of Patterson's trial, her estranged husband choked up as he explained his sorrow to a near empty courtroom.
He told the court that Patterson had tried to kill him with a curry, a wrap, Bolognese pasta, and even with chocolate cookies she claimed their daughter had made him. Mr Patterson's parents and his aunt had been killed, and his uncle almost died too, after eating the toxic meal prepared by his wife. He had narrowly avoided the same fate, pulling out of the lunch gathering the day before.
Patterson is in jail awaiting sentencing for her crimes "I have a lot to grieve," he said to the judge, sitting in the witness box as the jury prepared to return from a break.
He became suspicious so started making notes, realising he often became sick when she fed him, the court heard. "The legal process has been very difficult... especially the way it's progressed in terms of the charges relating to me and my evidence about that - or non-evidence now, I guess."
Mr Patterson shared his suspicions with a couple of relatives - including, critically, his father Don Patterson - and a GP, but didn't take things further. "I'm sitting here, half thinking about the things I'm not allowed to talk about and… I don't actually understand why. It seems bizarre to me, but it is what it is."
He said he thought he was the only one in danger, and this is why he refused to come to the lunch. What he wasn't allowed to talk about – the elephant in the room throughout the trial – was his claim that Patterson had been trying to poison him long before the fatal lunch that destroyed his family on 29 July 2023.
When his parents became desperately ill, though, Mr Paterson pulled his relatives into the hospital chapel and told them he suspected his estranged wife had been trying to poison him for years.
"[Simon] wanted to tell us that he suspected his own illnesses had been a deliberate act – that he'd stopped eating food that Erin had prepared because he suspected that she might have been messing with it," Ruth Dubois, the Wilkinsons' daughter, told a pre-trial hearing. Charges relating to Simon Patterson were dropped on the eve of the trial
Ms Dubois said Mr Patterson "was really sorry that he hadn't told our family or our parents before this, but he thought that he was the only person that she was targeting and that they'd be safe." Mr Patterson gave evidence during pre-trial hearings, which are a standard part of the court process and allow judges to determine what evidence is admissible - or allowed to be presented to a jury.
Police believed rat poison may have been used on at least one occasion, and had found a file on Patterson's computer with information about the toxin, the pre-trial hearings were told. As the charges relating to Mr Patterson were dropped, his evidence on the matter was excluded from the raft of information presented at the nine-week trial this year.
But he had explained that, as far as he knows, it all began with a Tupperware container of Bolognese penne in November 2021.
Mr Patterson and his wife had separated in 2015 – though they still aren't divorced – and he thought they remained on amicable terms.
Under questioning from Patterson's lawyer, Mr Patterson confirmed he had noticed "nothing untoward" in their relationship at that point: "If by 'nothing untoward', you mean anything that would make me think she would try and kill me, correct."
But after eating that meal, he began suffering from vomiting and diarrhoea, and spent a night in hospital.
"I had the idea I got sick from Erin's food. I did not give it too much thought," he said in his police statement, according to The Age newspaper.
Patterson claimed the fatal meal in 2023 was a tragic accident
Months later, in May 2022, he fell ill again after eating a chicken korma curry prepared by Patterson on a camping trip in the rugged mountains and alpine scruff of Victoria's High Country region.
"While Erin was preparing food I was getting the fire going so I didn't watch her prepare it," he told the court.
Within days, he was in a coma in a Melbourne hospital, and a large part of his bowel was surgically removed in a bid to save his life.
"My family were asked to come and say goodbye to me twice, as I was not expected to live," he said in a 2022 Facebook post, reported by The South Gippsland Sentinel Times two years ago.
In September, while visiting a stunning, isolated stretch of Victorian coastline, he would become desperately unwell again after eating a vegetable wrap.
At first, he felt nausea and diarrhoea coming on, the court heard, before his symptoms escalated. He started slurring his speech, gradually lost control of his muscles, and began "fitting".
"By the end of the journey [to hospital], all I could move was my neck, my tongue and lips," he told the court.
The food diary and chapel meeting
A family friend who was a doctor, Christopher Ford, suggested Mr Patterson start a food diary so they could try to figure out what was making him so sick.
"I couldn't understand why these things kept on happening to him in such a way that he had essentially three near-death experiences," Dr Ford told the court.
Mr Patterson returned to see him in February 2023, five months before the fatal lunch, revealing he'd come to believe his estranged wife was responsible.
He told Dr Ford about a batch of cookies supposedly baked by his daughter, which he feared were treats tainted – possibly with antifreeze chemicals - by his wife, who had called repeatedly to check whether he had eaten any.
The court would hear investigators never figured out what Patterson had allegedly been feeding him, though they suspected rat poison may have been used on at least one occasion, and had found a file on Patterson's computer with information about the toxin.
After this discovery, Mr Patterson changed his medical power of attorney, removing his wife, and quietly told a handful of family members - including his sister and his father – of his fears.
Erin Patterson separated from her husband Simon in 2015
The court heard that his father Don Patterson responded diplomatically, but his sister Anna Terrington told the pre-trial hearings she had believed her brother, and was anxious when she learned about the lunch Patterson had invited her parents to.
Anna called her parents the night before to warn them.
"Dad said, 'No, we'll be ok,'" she said.
Five days later, she gathered in a Melbourne hospital chapel alongside her brother and other worried relatives. Down the hall, deteriorating in their beds, were Don and Gail Patterson and Heather and Ian Wilkinson.
Ruth Dubois, the Wilkinsons' daughter, told the pre-trial hearings Simon Patterson had assembled the group to tell them he suspected his previous grave illnesses were the work of his wife.
"[He said] he had stopped eating food than Erin had prepared, because he suspected Erin had been messing with it," she said.
"He was really sorry that he hadn't told our family before this … but he thought he was the only person she was targeting, and that we would be safe."
Bizarre evidence
Watch: Australia’s mushroom murder case... in under two minutes
It was also revealed that Patterson had visited a local tip the afternoon of the lunch at her house, though it is unknown what, if anything, she disposed of there.It was also revealed that Patterson had visited a local tip the afternoon of the lunch at her house, though it is unknown what, if anything, she disposed of there.
The jury heard that she had travelled to the same dump days after the lunch to get rid of a food dehydrator used to prepare the meal, but the judge ruled they couldn't be told about the first visit.The jury heard that she had travelled to the same dump days after the lunch to get rid of a food dehydrator used to prepare the meal, but the judge ruled they couldn't be told about the first visit.
Other bizarre evidence which was ultimately left out of the trial included a 2020 post to a poisons help Facebook page, in which Patterson claimed her cat had eaten some mushrooms under a tree and had vomited, alongside pictures of fungi. Other bizarre evidence which was ultimately left out of the trial included a 2020 post to a poisons help forum on Facebook, in which Patterson claimed her cat had eaten some mushrooms under a tree and had vomited, alongside pictures of fungi.
Patterson had never owned a cat, prosecutors said, arguing the post was evidence of a long-standing interest in the poisonous properties of mushrooms.Patterson had never owned a cat, prosecutors said, arguing the post was evidence of a long-standing interest in the poisonous properties of mushrooms.
In a hearing on Friday, Justice Christopher Beale set down a sentencing hearing for 25 August, where those connected to the case will have the opportunity to give victim impact statements.