This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/aug/19/european-leaders-supplicants-putin-trump-protege
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| European leaders behave like supplicants to an almighty Trump. Putin just sees him as a protege | European leaders behave like supplicants to an almighty Trump. Putin just sees him as a protege |
| (32 minutes later) | |
| Nato’s Trump-whispering has been vital for Ukraine – but the White House and the Kremlin have their own special channel | Nato’s Trump-whispering has been vital for Ukraine – but the White House and the Kremlin have their own special channel |
| A hungry pigeon given food at frequent but irregular intervals will develop weird rituals – tics, dances, erratic head jerks – in the hope of summoning another morsel. BF Skinner, the psychologist who first demonstrated this effect in 1947, described the birds adopting “a sort of superstition … as if there were a causal relation between its behaviour and the presentation of food, although such a relation is lacking”. | A hungry pigeon given food at frequent but irregular intervals will develop weird rituals – tics, dances, erratic head jerks – in the hope of summoning another morsel. BF Skinner, the psychologist who first demonstrated this effect in 1947, described the birds adopting “a sort of superstition … as if there were a causal relation between its behaviour and the presentation of food, although such a relation is lacking”. |
| It would be unkind to compare that bird-brained affliction to the behaviour of European leaders trying to make sense of Donald Trump’s erratic distribution of favours. Their diplomatic manoeuvres are more rational. And they get results. But there is also an element of superstition. Visiting politicians make lavish gestures, strike unusual poses, cultivate White House contacts, looking for the sequence of steps that will unlock a steady supply of American amity. The causal relation is not lacking, but it is unreliable. | It would be unkind to compare that bird-brained affliction to the behaviour of European leaders trying to make sense of Donald Trump’s erratic distribution of favours. Their diplomatic manoeuvres are more rational. And they get results. But there is also an element of superstition. Visiting politicians make lavish gestures, strike unusual poses, cultivate White House contacts, looking for the sequence of steps that will unlock a steady supply of American amity. The causal relation is not lacking, but it is unreliable. |
| In February, Keir Starmer wooed Trump with an invitation to visit Britain as a guest of his majesty the king. The prime minister was rewarded with relative leniency under the White House’s punitive tariff regime. In March, the Finnish president, Alexander Stubb, impressed his US counterpart with technical prowess on the golf course. Between shots, he seeded the conversation with warnings not to trust Vladimir Putin. There followed a discernible dip in Trump’s patience with the Russian president. | In February, Keir Starmer wooed Trump with an invitation to visit Britain as a guest of his majesty the king. The prime minister was rewarded with relative leniency under the White House’s punitive tariff regime. In March, the Finnish president, Alexander Stubb, impressed his US counterpart with technical prowess on the golf course. Between shots, he seeded the conversation with warnings not to trust Vladimir Putin. There followed a discernible dip in Trump’s patience with the Russian president. |
| At a summit in June, Nato leaders presented hikes in their national defence budgets as tributes paid in honour of the US president’s superior statecraft. The alliance’s secretary general, Mark Rutte, performed a rhetorical kowtow, praising “daddy” Trump, thanking him for making Europe pay more for its own defence. Choreographed sycophancy seemed to work. Trump spoke of Nato with uncharacteristic warmth. His tone towards Russia turned chillier. | At a summit in June, Nato leaders presented hikes in their national defence budgets as tributes paid in honour of the US president’s superior statecraft. The alliance’s secretary general, Mark Rutte, performed a rhetorical kowtow, praising “daddy” Trump, thanking him for making Europe pay more for its own defence. Choreographed sycophancy seemed to work. Trump spoke of Nato with uncharacteristic warmth. His tone towards Russia turned chillier. |
| It didn’t last. Putin countered with his own campaign of flattery. Trump emerged from last week’s bilateral summit in Alaska with a roadmap to peace in Ukraine that followed twisted Kremlin directions – no imminent ceasefire and cessions of unconquered land to Russia. | It didn’t last. Putin countered with his own campaign of flattery. Trump emerged from last week’s bilateral summit in Alaska with a roadmap to peace in Ukraine that followed twisted Kremlin directions – no imminent ceasefire and cessions of unconquered land to Russia. |
| And so the ritual dance began anew. A flock of European pigeons raced to Washington, cooing and flapping in support of the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, hoping to generate a fresh portion of transatlantic solidarity. | And so the ritual dance began anew. A flock of European pigeons raced to Washington, cooing and flapping in support of the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, hoping to generate a fresh portion of transatlantic solidarity. |
| The result could have been a lot worse. There was no repeat of the notorious ritual humiliation that Trump inflicted on Zelenskyy for the cameras in February. In place of bullying there was bonhomie. On the substance of a peace settlement, there is talk of security guarantees for Ukraine resembling but not replicating article 5 – the mutual assistance clause of Nato’s founding charter. What that really means, how it might be enforced, whether it will be underwritten by US military might and therefore how deterred Russia would be from any renewed landgrabs are all questions left hanging. | The result could have been a lot worse. There was no repeat of the notorious ritual humiliation that Trump inflicted on Zelenskyy for the cameras in February. In place of bullying there was bonhomie. On the substance of a peace settlement, there is talk of security guarantees for Ukraine resembling but not replicating article 5 – the mutual assistance clause of Nato’s founding charter. What that really means, how it might be enforced, whether it will be underwritten by US military might and therefore how deterred Russia would be from any renewed landgrabs are all questions left hanging. |
| The next stage is a proposed face-to-face meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin, followed by a trilateral summit with Trump. The Russian president is reported to be open to the idea of direct talks with his Ukrainian enemy, but there is no enthusiasm for such an encounter in the Kremlin. | The next stage is a proposed face-to-face meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin, followed by a trilateral summit with Trump. The Russian president is reported to be open to the idea of direct talks with his Ukrainian enemy, but there is no enthusiasm for such an encounter in the Kremlin. |
| To justify full-scale invasion, Putin cast Zelenskyy as the despised boss of a drug-addled, neo-Nazi junta preventing Ukraine’s eager reintegration into the greater slavic motherland. When that fiction proved hard to sustain, the emphasis shifted to presenting the Ukrainian leader as a pawn in a long-running western campaign to diminish and humiliate Russia. That story was meant to end with Zelenskyy’s death or surrender. It will not be easy for Moscow propagandists to narrate a different denouement where the Ukrainian president talks terms with Putin as his unvanquished peer. | To justify full-scale invasion, Putin cast Zelenskyy as the despised boss of a drug-addled, neo-Nazi junta preventing Ukraine’s eager reintegration into the greater slavic motherland. When that fiction proved hard to sustain, the emphasis shifted to presenting the Ukrainian leader as a pawn in a long-running western campaign to diminish and humiliate Russia. That story was meant to end with Zelenskyy’s death or surrender. It will not be easy for Moscow propagandists to narrate a different denouement where the Ukrainian president talks terms with Putin as his unvanquished peer. |
| Avoiding such a scenario had been one of the Russian president’s two big achievements in Alaska. First, by insisting on a bilateral meeting, Putin was able to bounce Trump into endorsing a template for peace that contains no hint of rebuke or reparation for flagrant territorial aggression. | Avoiding such a scenario had been one of the Russian president’s two big achievements in Alaska. First, by insisting on a bilateral meeting, Putin was able to bounce Trump into endorsing a template for peace that contains no hint of rebuke or reparation for flagrant territorial aggression. |
| Second, by recreating the optics of cold war detente – a superpower summit to settle the fate of lesser nations – Putin signalled to his domestic audience that Soviet-style parity with the US was restored. To European democracies he hoped to prove that their efforts at isolating Russia as a thuggish pariah state would come to naught. | Second, by recreating the optics of cold war detente – a superpower summit to settle the fate of lesser nations – Putin signalled to his domestic audience that Soviet-style parity with the US was restored. To European democracies he hoped to prove that their efforts at isolating Russia as a thuggish pariah state would come to naught. |
| The notion of Russia as America’s equal on any measure of power (except the size of nuclear arsenal) was a delusion even before the USSR unravelled, but one that Trump willingly indulges. It is a corollary of his obsession with making America great again, and doing so by authoritarian measures. It predisposes him to denigrate the accomplishments of 20th-century US democracy and project greatness on to regimes that showcase despotism under a personality cult. | The notion of Russia as America’s equal on any measure of power (except the size of nuclear arsenal) was a delusion even before the USSR unravelled, but one that Trump willingly indulges. It is a corollary of his obsession with making America great again, and doing so by authoritarian measures. It predisposes him to denigrate the accomplishments of 20th-century US democracy and project greatness on to regimes that showcase despotism under a personality cult. |
| Putin is skilled at manipulating that attraction. While European leaders lobby Trump in the style of supplicants at the court of a king, Russia’s modern tsar cultivates him as something more like a protege – a recruit to the exclusive club of world historical figures who dictate the destiny of millions. They are the kind of men who redraw borders and parcel out land among themselves, not the kind that whines when the territorial allocation is unfair. It is a concept of geopolitics that despises international law and denigrates multilateral alliances as crafty games that minnow countries play to trap the big fish. | Putin is skilled at manipulating that attraction. While European leaders lobby Trump in the style of supplicants at the court of a king, Russia’s modern tsar cultivates him as something more like a protege – a recruit to the exclusive club of world historical figures who dictate the destiny of millions. They are the kind of men who redraw borders and parcel out land among themselves, not the kind that whines when the territorial allocation is unfair. It is a concept of geopolitics that despises international law and denigrates multilateral alliances as crafty games that minnow countries play to trap the big fish. |
| That speaks to Trump’s narcissistic personality and aversion to any institutional constraint on his power. It means the Russian president is communicating with the White House on his own special channel, on a higher frequency. | That speaks to Trump’s narcissistic personality and aversion to any institutional constraint on his power. It means the Russian president is communicating with the White House on his own special channel, on a higher frequency. |
| European counter-signals aren’t blocked. The evidence shows real success in shifting Trump away from a policy of unthinking pro-Kremlin alignment. But there is a perverse imbalance of influence. Just when the leaders of America’s oldest and most loyal allies think they have mastered the art of Trump-whispering, they find his ears have been thoroughly bent by Russian disinformation. | European counter-signals aren’t blocked. The evidence shows real success in shifting Trump away from a policy of unthinking pro-Kremlin alignment. But there is a perverse imbalance of influence. Just when the leaders of America’s oldest and most loyal allies think they have mastered the art of Trump-whispering, they find his ears have been thoroughly bent by Russian disinformation. |
| In the short term, there isn’t an obvious alternative but to carry on with the current method, using force of numbers and repetition to persuade Trump that his route to greatness goes by way of durable Ukrainian independence with muscular security guarantees. | In the short term, there isn’t an obvious alternative but to carry on with the current method, using force of numbers and repetition to persuade Trump that his route to greatness goes by way of durable Ukrainian independence with muscular security guarantees. |
| It is certainly feasible that the Europeans’ diplomatic dance can nudge the president’s position in a more equitable direction on the road to a peace deal. But they will not effect any revision of his view of a world divided between mighty power players, to whom no rules apply, and vassal states. | It is certainly feasible that the Europeans’ diplomatic dance can nudge the president’s position in a more equitable direction on the road to a peace deal. But they will not effect any revision of his view of a world divided between mighty power players, to whom no rules apply, and vassal states. |
| The challenge then is to develop European capacity as a coherent and autonomous power player – to evolve and coordinate the continent’s economic and military heft with confidence and on a scale to command respect in the only language the US president understands. | |
| The current approach isn’t exactly failing. But Trump-whispering is an unstable and inherently transient method at best. At worst it starts to look like a superstitious belief that performing the rituals of an old alliance will conjure it back into being. The right pigeon steps can win vital favours from the US president. The idea that he could ever be the true friend Europe wants him to be is for the birds. | The current approach isn’t exactly failing. But Trump-whispering is an unstable and inherently transient method at best. At worst it starts to look like a superstitious belief that performing the rituals of an old alliance will conjure it back into being. The right pigeon steps can win vital favours from the US president. The idea that he could ever be the true friend Europe wants him to be is for the birds. |
| Rafael Behr is a Guardian columnist | Rafael Behr is a Guardian columnist |
| Rafael Behr is a Guardian columnist | Rafael Behr is a Guardian columnist |
Previous version
1
Next version