This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/aug/20/met-police-facial-recognition-plans-fall-foul-of-european-law-says-watchdog-notting-hill-carnival
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Met police’s facial recognition plans fall foul of European law, says watchdog | Met police’s facial recognition plans fall foul of European law, says watchdog |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| Use of cameras at Notting Hill carnival could have ‘chilling effect’ on people’s rights, says equality regulator | Use of cameras at Notting Hill carnival could have ‘chilling effect’ on people’s rights, says equality regulator |
| Scotland Yard’s plan to widen the use of live facial recognition technology is unlawful because it is incompatible with European laws, the equalities regulator has claimed. | Scotland Yard’s plan to widen the use of live facial recognition technology is unlawful because it is incompatible with European laws, the equalities regulator has claimed. |
| As the UK’s biggest force prepares to use instant face-matching cameras at this weekend’s Notting Hill carnival, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said its use was intrusive and could have a “chilling effect” on individuals’ rights. | As the UK’s biggest force prepares to use instant face-matching cameras at this weekend’s Notting Hill carnival, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said its use was intrusive and could have a “chilling effect” on individuals’ rights. |
| The development will be a blow to Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan police commissioner, who has backed the use of the technology at mass events such as this weekend’s carnival, when 2 million people are expected to descend upon west London. | The development will be a blow to Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan police commissioner, who has backed the use of the technology at mass events such as this weekend’s carnival, when 2 million people are expected to descend upon west London. |
| The EHRC has been given permission to intervene in a judicial review launched last month by the anti-knife campaigner Shaun Thompson. Thompson, a Black British man, was wrongly identified by live facial recognition (LFR) as a criminal, held by police, then faced demands from officers for his fingerprints. | The EHRC has been given permission to intervene in a judicial review launched last month by the anti-knife campaigner Shaun Thompson. Thompson, a Black British man, was wrongly identified by live facial recognition (LFR) as a criminal, held by police, then faced demands from officers for his fingerprints. |
| Data seen by the EHRC shows that the number of black men triggering an “alert” by the technology is higher than would be expected proportionally when compared with the population of London, it said. | |
| A letter last week from 11 anti-racist and civil liberty organisations, disclosed in the Guardian, urged the Met to scrap the use of the technology over concerns of racial bias and the impending legal challenge. | A letter last week from 11 anti-racist and civil liberty organisations, disclosed in the Guardian, urged the Met to scrap the use of the technology over concerns of racial bias and the impending legal challenge. |
| LFR technology captures and analyses the faces of individuals passing in front of real-time CCTV cameras. It extracts unique biometric data from each face and compares it against a “watchlist” of thousands of people sought by the police. | LFR technology captures and analyses the faces of individuals passing in front of real-time CCTV cameras. It extracts unique biometric data from each face and compares it against a “watchlist” of thousands of people sought by the police. |
| There is at present no specific domestic legislation regulating police use of LFR, with police using common law powers instead. The Met insists that the Equality Act 2010 places legal obligations upon them to eliminate discrimination. | There is at present no specific domestic legislation regulating police use of LFR, with police using common law powers instead. The Met insists that the Equality Act 2010 places legal obligations upon them to eliminate discrimination. |
| The EHRC said that the claim brought forward by Thompson “raises issues of significant public importance” and will provide submissions “on the intrusive nature of LFR technology” which focus on the way in which the technology has been used by the police. | The EHRC said that the claim brought forward by Thompson “raises issues of significant public importance” and will provide submissions “on the intrusive nature of LFR technology” which focus on the way in which the technology has been used by the police. |
| The Met’s policy on LFR technology was unlawful because it was incompatible with articles 8 (right to privacy), 10 (freedom of expression), and 11 (freedom of assembly and association) of the European convention on human rights, the watchdog said. | |
| Rebecca Vincent, the interim director of Big Brother Watch, said the EHRC’s intervention was “hugely welcome”. | Rebecca Vincent, the interim director of Big Brother Watch, said the EHRC’s intervention was “hugely welcome”. |
| She added: “The rapid proliferation of invasive live facial recognition technology without any legislation governing its use is one of the most pressing human rights concerns in the UK today. Live facial recognition surveillance turns our faces into barcodes and makes us a nation of suspects who, as we’ve seen in Shaun’s case, can be falsely accused, grossly mistreated and forced to prove our innocence to authorities.” | |
| John Kirkpatrick, the chief executive of the EHRC, said: “There must be clear rules which guarantee that live facial recognition technology is used only where necessary, proportionate and constrained by appropriate safeguards. We believe that the Metropolitan police’s current policy falls short of this standard.” | |
| The Met said last month it would deploy specially mounted cameras at entries and exits of the two-day event in west London. | |
| Sign up to Headlines UK | Sign up to Headlines UK |
| Get the day’s headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning | Get the day’s headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning |
| after newsletter promotion | after newsletter promotion |
| Rowley wrote on Tuesday that the technology would target the “small minority” who committed serious crimes, including violence and sexual offences. | |
| A spokesperson for Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, said: “The mayor is committed to working closely with partners to help deliver a safe and welcoming Notting Hill carnival for all. | |
| “All live facial recognition deployments are an operational decision for the Met. | |
| “The mayor is committed to ensuring the Met is open and transparent around where, when, why and how live facial recognition technology is used. Sadiq and his Office for Policing and Crime will scrutinise and oversee its use to ensure there’s trust and confidence in policing as we continue to build a safer London for everyone.” | |
| Alba Kapoor, racial justice lead at Amnesty International UK, said: “The Equality and Human Rights Commission’s intervention is absolutely correct. Facial recognition technology has been proven repeatedly to be discriminatory, being less accurate in scanning the faces of people of colour and leading to wrongful arrest, causing distress and harm. These systems violate our right to privacy, our rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and expression, and to equality and non-discrimination. | |
| “No matter who we are, we should all feel safe to move freely without risk of harassment or false arrest. The Met’s plans to use this dangerous and discriminatory tool of surveillance should be immediately scrapped.” | |
| The Met has been approached for comment. | The Met has been approached for comment. |