This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/business/6378659.stm

The article has changed 16 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
High Court victory for pensioners High Court victory for pensioners
(10 minutes later)
Four people who lost all or part of their company pensions have won their High Court case against the government.Four people who lost all or part of their company pensions have won their High Court case against the government.
The Court ruled that the government was wrong to reject the Parliamentary Ombudsman's report into collapsed pension schemes.The Court ruled that the government was wrong to reject the Parliamentary Ombudsman's report into collapsed pension schemes.
The Ombudsman, Ann Abraham, said last year that the government was guilty of maladministration.The Ombudsman, Ann Abraham, said last year that the government was guilty of maladministration.
The Court decision does not mean that the government must compensate an estimated 85,000 people for their loss.The Court decision does not mean that the government must compensate an estimated 85,000 people for their loss.
However, the ruling will intensify pressure on the government over the compensation issue.However, the ruling will intensify pressure on the government over the compensation issue.
The case affects 85,000 people who lost their pensions between 1997 and 2005.The case affects 85,000 people who lost their pensions between 1997 and 2005.
THE LOST PENSIONS 85,000 people were affected 400 schemes closed with deficitsThey were shut between 1997 and 2005Only limited compensation is available from the Financial Assistance SchemeThe Pension Protection Fund only covers schemes from April 2005 Why we are going to the High Court
The court case was brought by four people who had lost their pensions - Bob Duncan, Andrew Parr, Henry Bradley and Tom Waugh.
The judicial review was an attempt to compel the government to abide by the Ombudsman's rulings.
Ombudsman's report
Ann Abraham published her report in March 2006.
She said that the government's maladministration had "caused injustice to a large number of people who, as a result, lost the opportunity to make informed choices about their future".
Specifically, information published in government leaflets had misled large numbers of pensioners, the report found.
Several times since then, Tony Blair and his ministers have rejected the idea that the pensioners should be offered full compensation for the pensions they may have lost.
This happened when their employers went bust, or closed their under-funded pension schemes, between 1997 and 2005.
The government has repeatedly argued that it was not at fault and it would be too expensive to pay full compensation.
The government has estimated the total cost of paying compensation at £15bn, but campaigners for people who have lost their pensions say the true cost would be much lower.