This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gqgq44n0po

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Epping council eyes Supreme Court over asylum seeker hotel Epping council eyes Supreme Court over asylum seeker hotel
(32 minutes later)
Thousands of people have protested outside The Bell Hotel in Epping recentlyThousands of people have protested outside The Bell Hotel in Epping recently
Epping Forest District Council has asked for permission to take its case against a hotel housing asylum seekers to the Supreme Court.Epping Forest District Council has asked for permission to take its case against a hotel housing asylum seekers to the Supreme Court.
Thousands of people have protested outside The Bell Hotel in Epping over the last two months.Thousands of people have protested outside The Bell Hotel in Epping over the last two months.
The district council obtained a temporary injunction from the High Court which would have forced 138 asylum seekers to leave by 12 September.The district council obtained a temporary injunction from the High Court which would have forced 138 asylum seekers to leave by 12 September.
The Court of Appeal overturned the ruling last week. The council confirmed on Monday it had taken the next steps to appealing the decision. The Court of Appeal overturned the ruling last week. The council confirmed on Monday it had taken the next steps to appeal the decision.
A council spokesperson said: "Indicating our intention to appeal does not commit us to further action but facilitates the later process, should we decide to do so.A council spokesperson said: "Indicating our intention to appeal does not commit us to further action but facilitates the later process, should we decide to do so.
"Refusal of the Court of Appeal to allow our request would not close our opportunity. The council would still have the right to apply directly to the Supreme Court.""Refusal of the Court of Appeal to allow our request would not close our opportunity. The council would still have the right to apply directly to the Supreme Court."
The district council had argued at the High Court that the site owner, Somani Hotels, had breached planning by not notifying the local authority of its plans for the Bell. The district council had argued at the High Court that the site owner, Somani Hotels, had breached planning rules by not notifying the local authority of its plans for the Bell.
Following the decision, Conservative council leader Chris Whitbread also said the protests had placed an "intolerable strain on our community".
But Somani Hotels and the Home Office – which places migrants at the site – took the case to the Court of Appeal.But Somani Hotels and the Home Office – which places migrants at the site – took the case to the Court of Appeal.
The judge there, Lord Justice Bean, said the temporary injunction ruling was "seriously flawed in principle".The judge there, Lord Justice Bean, said the temporary injunction ruling was "seriously flawed in principle".
He said it ignored the "obvious consequences" that the closure would put pressure on the system elsewhere and said the decision risked "encouraging further lawlessness". Conservative council leader Chris Whitbread had argued that the "intolerable strain on our community" caused by protests was reason to close the site.
However, Lord Justice Bean said this argument risked "encouraging further lawlessness".
On Friday, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said the judgement proved that migrants had "more rights than the British people under [Keir] Starmer".
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said it "puts the rights of illegal immigrants above the rights of the British people".
Border Security and Asylum Minister Dame Angela Eagle said the latest judgement would assist the government in ending the use of hotels in a "planned and orderly fashion".
She added: "We all want the same thing, which is to get out of asylum hotels".
Footage from 17 July showed projectiles being thrown towards police officers
Refugee and migrant groups welcomed the Court of Appeal judgement, and Steve Smith from Care4Calais said: "[It] made it clear that violent protest, and in many cases overt racism, is not a fast-track route for the far-right to attack the rights of people seeing sanctuary in this country."
A full High Court hearing to discuss a permanent injunction for the Bell had already been scheduled for October.
Dozens of people have been arrested in connection with disorder near the hotel, and many of them have been charged.
The recent wave of protests followed the arrest and subsequent charging of an asylum seeker living at the hotel with several offences including the sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl.
Hadush Kebatu, who is from Ethiopia, is on trial and denies the offences.
Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.