This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/04/us-sanctions-palestinian-human-rights
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 2 | Version 3 |
|---|---|
| US imposes sanctions on Palestinians for requesting war crimes inquiry | US imposes sanctions on Palestinians for requesting war crimes inquiry |
| (8 days later) | |
| Rights groups in Gaza and Ramallah had asked international criminal court to investigate Israel over genocide claims | Rights groups in Gaza and Ramallah had asked international criminal court to investigate Israel over genocide claims |
| The US has imposed sanctions against three Palestinian human rights groups that asked the international criminal court (ICC) to investigate Israel over allegations of genocide in Gaza, according to a notice posted to the US treasury department’s website. | The US has imposed sanctions against three Palestinian human rights groups that asked the international criminal court (ICC) to investigate Israel over allegations of genocide in Gaza, according to a notice posted to the US treasury department’s website. |
| The three groups – the Gaza-based Palestinian Centre for Human Rights and Al Mezan Center for Human Rights, and the Ramallah-based Al-Haq – were listed under what the treasury department said were ICC-related designations. | The three groups – the Gaza-based Palestinian Centre for Human Rights and Al Mezan Center for Human Rights, and the Ramallah-based Al-Haq – were listed under what the treasury department said were ICC-related designations. |
| The groups are leading rights monitors in Palestine and have been engaged in documenting alleged Israeli war crimes in Gaza over the past 23 months. Sanctions will make it harder for international human rights organisations to cooperate with the groups, and will make day-to-day life more difficult for their employees. | The groups are leading rights monitors in Palestine and have been engaged in documenting alleged Israeli war crimes in Gaza over the past 23 months. Sanctions will make it harder for international human rights organisations to cooperate with the groups, and will make day-to-day life more difficult for their employees. |
| The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said sanctions were imposed on the rights monitors for having “directly engaged in efforts by the international criminal court to investigate, arrest, detain or prosecute Israeli nationals, without Israel’s consent”. | The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said sanctions were imposed on the rights monitors for having “directly engaged in efforts by the international criminal court to investigate, arrest, detain or prosecute Israeli nationals, without Israel’s consent”. |
| Days earlier, the world’s leading genocide scholars’ association said Israel’s actions in Gaza met the legal definition of genocide, an accusation Israel has denied. | Days earlier, the world’s leading genocide scholars’ association said Israel’s actions in Gaza met the legal definition of genocide, an accusation Israel has denied. |
| The groups asked the ICC in November 2023 to investigate Israeli airstrikes on densely populated civilian areas of Gaza, the siege of the territory and displacement of the population. | The groups asked the ICC in November 2023 to investigate Israeli airstrikes on densely populated civilian areas of Gaza, the siege of the territory and displacement of the population. |
| Since filing the lawsuit, the humanitarian conditions in Gaza have worsened significantly, with the territory facing a starvation crisis and more than 80% of its infrastructure destroyed by Israeli bombing. At that point, nearly 10,000 Palestinians had been killed in Gaza – the number of dead is now more than 64,000. | Since filing the lawsuit, the humanitarian conditions in Gaza have worsened significantly, with the territory facing a starvation crisis and more than 80% of its infrastructure destroyed by Israeli bombing. At that point, nearly 10,000 Palestinians had been killed in Gaza – the number of dead is now more than 64,000. |
| Two weeks ago, an Israeli strike on Nasser hospital in southern Gaza that killed 22 people, including five journalists, raised further questions about Israel’s conduct in the strip. | Two weeks ago, an Israeli strike on Nasser hospital in southern Gaza that killed 22 people, including five journalists, raised further questions about Israel’s conduct in the strip. |
| An investigation released by the Associated Press on Friday cast doubt on Israel’s explanation that its forces had struck a position that was well known as a journalists’ gathering point because they believed a camera on the roof was being used by Hamas to observe troops. The AP said it had gathered new evidence indicating the camera in question actually belonged to a Reuters video journalist who was killed in the initial strike. | An investigation released by the Associated Press on Friday cast doubt on Israel’s explanation that its forces had struck a position that was well known as a journalists’ gathering point because they believed a camera on the roof was being used by Hamas to observe troops. The AP said it had gathered new evidence indicating the camera in question actually belonged to a Reuters video journalist who was killed in the initial strike. |
| The agency noted it had repeatedly informed the army its journalists were stationed there, and that its investigation showed that troops used high-explosive tank shells to strike the hospital, instead of more precise guided weapons that might have resulted in fewer casualties. | The agency noted it had repeatedly informed the army its journalists were stationed there, and that its investigation showed that troops used high-explosive tank shells to strike the hospital, instead of more precise guided weapons that might have resulted in fewer casualties. |
| It said that soon after the first strike, Israeli forces had hit the same position again, after medical and emergency workers had reached the scene to treat the injured. The timing was reminiscent of the “double-tap” technique used by al-Qaida and by forces of the former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, and others. | It said that soon after the first strike, Israeli forces had hit the same position again, after medical and emergency workers had reached the scene to treat the injured. The timing was reminiscent of the “double-tap” technique used by al-Qaida and by forces of the former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, and others. |
| The three rights organisations released a joint statement condemning the sanctions, which they described as “immoral, illegal and undemocratic”. | The three rights organisations released a joint statement condemning the sanctions, which they described as “immoral, illegal and undemocratic”. |
| In their 2023 lawsuit, the three Palestinian groups asked the court to examine factors including Israel’s bombing of densely populated areas in Gaza and prevention of aid into the territory, claiming the actions amounted to crimes against humanity and incitement to genocide. | In their 2023 lawsuit, the three Palestinian groups asked the court to examine factors including Israel’s bombing of densely populated areas in Gaza and prevention of aid into the territory, claiming the actions amounted to crimes against humanity and incitement to genocide. |
| A year later, the ICC issued arrest warrants for the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and his former defence chief Yoav Gallant, as well as a Hamas leader, Ibrahim al-Masri, for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. | A year later, the ICC issued arrest warrants for the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and his former defence chief Yoav Gallant, as well as a Hamas leader, Ibrahim al-Masri, for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. |
| Netanyahu’s office denounced the warrants as “antisemitic” and said Israel “utterly rejects the false and absurd charges”. | Netanyahu’s office denounced the warrants as “antisemitic” and said Israel “utterly rejects the false and absurd charges”. |
| Sign up to First Thing | Sign up to First Thing |
| Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters | Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters |
| after newsletter promotion | after newsletter promotion |
| Donald Trump’s administration has imposed sanctions against ICC judges as well as its chief prosecutor over the Israeli arrest warrants and a past decision to open a case into alleged war crimes by US troops in Afghanistan. | Donald Trump’s administration has imposed sanctions against ICC judges as well as its chief prosecutor over the Israeli arrest warrants and a past decision to open a case into alleged war crimes by US troops in Afghanistan. |
| The ICC, which was established in 2002, has jurisdiction over war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in its 125 member countries. Some nations, including the US, China, Russia and Israel, do not recognise its authority. | The ICC, which was established in 2002, has jurisdiction over war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in its 125 member countries. Some nations, including the US, China, Russia and Israel, do not recognise its authority. |
| Despite 124 countries being obliged to carry out the arrest warrants, in practice, states such as Hungary have not arrested Netanyahu when he visited. | Despite 124 countries being obliged to carry out the arrest warrants, in practice, states such as Hungary have not arrested Netanyahu when he visited. |
| Israel also faces a case at the international court of justice brought by South Africa, which alleges that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Unlike the ICC, rulings from the ICJ are not legally binding but instead are used to inform the UN security council. | Israel also faces a case at the international court of justice brought by South Africa, which alleges that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Unlike the ICC, rulings from the ICJ are not legally binding but instead are used to inform the UN security council. |
| In an interim judgment in January 2024, the ICJ ruled that Palestinians’ right to be protected from genocide was at “imminent risk”, saying Israel must “with immediate effect” ensure its forces not commit any acts prohibited by the genocide convention and must allow more aid into Gaza. A final ruling is not expected until 2027 at the earliest. | |
| Israel has almost entirely ignored the ICJ’s provisional measures and has reduced the amount of aid let into the territory since the ruling. | Israel has almost entirely ignored the ICJ’s provisional measures and has reduced the amount of aid let into the territory since the ruling. |
| Israel launched its assault on the Gaza Strip in October 2023, after fighters from Hamas, the Palestinian militant group in control of the territory, attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking 250 hostages back into Gaza. | Israel launched its assault on the Gaza Strip in October 2023, after fighters from Hamas, the Palestinian militant group in control of the territory, attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking 250 hostages back into Gaza. |
| Since then, Israel’s war has killed 64,000 people, forced most of Gaza’s population to flee their homes at least once, and set off a starvation crisis in parts of the territory that a global hunger monitor described as a famine. | Since then, Israel’s war has killed 64,000 people, forced most of Gaza’s population to flee their homes at least once, and set off a starvation crisis in parts of the territory that a global hunger monitor described as a famine. |
| This article was amended on 13 September 2025 to revise a reference to the interim findings of the international court of justice (ICJ). An earlier version said the ICJ found “the claim of genocide was ‘plausible’”; in the words of the judgment it was the right of Palestinians to be protected from acts of genocide that the court said was plausible. | |
| . |