This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/sep/12/neo-nazi-thomas-sewell-found-guilty-of-intimidating-police-officer-by-threatening-to-dox-them-ntwnfb
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell found guilty of intimidating police officer by threatening to dox him | Neo-Nazi Thomas Sewell found guilty of intimidating police officer by threatening to dox him |
(about 2 hours later) | |
Police officer gave evidence to Melbourne court hearing about feeling ‘highly anxious’ over his and his family’s safety after Sewell’s podcast comments | Police officer gave evidence to Melbourne court hearing about feeling ‘highly anxious’ over his and his family’s safety after Sewell’s podcast comments |
Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates | Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates |
Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast | Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast |
A neo-Nazi leader has been handed a community work order for intimidating a police officer and his wife. | |
Thomas Sewell, 32, was on Friday found guilty of three charges of intimidation of a law enforcement officer, and his wife, over targeted threats to expose his personal information. | |
He faced Melbourne magistrates court in person, from the court dock while on remand for separate matters. | |
Sewell threatened to “dox” a police officer and his wife on podcasts in October and November last year, including threats to release personal information and wedding photos. | |
“I’m working out how to dox him because those doxing laws haven’t come into effect yet,” he told a podcast. “Like his wedding photos, we’ve got it all downloaded, he’s a fucking idiot.” | “I’m working out how to dox him because those doxing laws haven’t come into effect yet,” he told a podcast. “Like his wedding photos, we’ve got it all downloaded, he’s a fucking idiot.” |
Sign up: AU Breaking News email | Sign up: AU Breaking News email |
The police officer gave evidence to the hearing about feeling “highly anxious” about his and his family’s safety. | The police officer gave evidence to the hearing about feeling “highly anxious” about his and his family’s safety. |
“I didn’t know what he was going to do with that information,” he told the court. | “I didn’t know what he was going to do with that information,” he told the court. |
The officer’s wife did not give evidence in person to the hearing, but her statement was handed to the court. | The officer’s wife did not give evidence in person to the hearing, but her statement was handed to the court. |
“I felt really intimidated and threatened, I felt like we were in danger,” she said. | “I felt really intimidated and threatened, I felt like we were in danger,” she said. |
Sewell claimed he was holding police to account and using his implied “freedom of communication” about public affairs when he spoke about the officer and his family. | Sewell claimed he was holding police to account and using his implied “freedom of communication” about public affairs when he spoke about the officer and his family. |
But magistrate Michelle Hodgson rejected these arguments, finding he had targeted the officer’s private life. | |
Hodgson found he had “sought to weaponise personal information, personal insult and public exposure to instil fear” in the officer and his wife. | |
His offending was “objectively very serious”, she said as she shut down Sewell’s claim it was at the lower end. | |
“Police officers are front line forces of the law, if they are intimidated from carrying out their duties – because of threats of exposure, humiliation or retaliation – the justice system itself is undermined,” she told the court. | |
“A threat to dox can expose family, friends and home life, it uses technology to make private information available to a potentially hostile audience. | |
Sign up to Breaking News Australia | Sign up to Breaking News Australia |
Get the most important news as it breaks | Get the most important news as it breaks |
after newsletter promotion | after newsletter promotion |
“Once online, it’s virtually impossible to contain.” | |
She said the maximum term of 10 years in prison for the offending, or two years if heard in the magistrates court, reflected the offending involved “a high degree of harm and trauma”. | |
However, Hodgson decided not to hand Sewell any prison time. | |
She ordered he complete 200 hours of community work over 18 months, which will commence once he is released from custody for the separate offending. | |
Sewell had self-represented in a contested hearing over the charges, which ran for more than a week. | |
On day two of the hearing, on 2 September, he was arrested outside the court over an alleged attack on an Indigenous protest site, known as Camp Sovereignty, and taken into custody. | |
Hodgson found him guilty of intimation against a police officer and his wife, earlier on Friday, and also guilty of two counts of contravening personal safety orders. | |
He was found not guilty of two other contraventions of those orders, and of failing to comply with a police direction to hand over passwords to his devices. |