This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/6402965.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Government wins probation battle Government wins probation battle
(about 1 hour later)
The government has won a vote over plans to privatise the Probation Service, despite a backbench revolt.The government has won a vote over plans to privatise the Probation Service, despite a backbench revolt.
MPs voted 293 to 268 in favour of the Offender Management Bill, and ministers had earlier won a vote on an amendment about "core" services. MPs voted 293 to 268 in favour of the Offender Management Bill - cutting the government's majority from 62 to 25.
Critics say letting firms and voluntary groups in England and Wales run services would increase reoffending rates and destroy "local connections". Critics said letting firms and voluntary groups in England and Wales run services would increase reoffending rates and destroy "local connections".
But the government says its reforms are essential to improving public safety. The government said reforms were key to improving public safety and insisted the public sector would be involved.
Staff 'poaching' Home Secretary John Reid told MPs that the process of reform would not be rushed.
The government earlier won a vote on an amendment tabled by Labour MP Neil Gerrard which would have excluded firms and voluntary groups from carrying out "core" probation tasks. "The core offender management tasks of the Probation Service, for example offender report writing, offender supervision and breach proceedings, will remain in the public sector for the next three years."
What we end up with is a mass of different providers and we lose a national service Neil Gerrard MPWhat we end up with is a mass of different providers and we lose a national service Neil Gerrard MP
MPs voted by 267 to 111, a majority of 156. He also said local accountability would be important in running probation services, with probation boards having to co-operate with councils.
Mr Gerrard said companies with no experience of handling offenders would end up "poaching" staff from the Probation Service. "I firmly believe that this Bill, together with related reforms will increase not reduce that accountability."
He said the re-offending rate was still high despite investment, therefore more than one sector was needed to handle the situation.
"We need to open up the reservoir of potential assistance for offenders so that every provider - public, voluntary, charitable and the private sector - can play to their strengths," he said.
'Opportunistic' Tories
He also said that if the public sector were "good enough then it will have every bit as much chance, and some would say because of the history of involvement in this and their experience, a better chance, as anybody else to win this work."
He had warned Labour MPs: "To vote against the government tonight in contradiction to everything they have publicly declared in the past, even if they were to win, would be at best a hollow victory, since in capturing their minutes of opportunism they will have thrown away the hours of integrity and it will have been noticed by the public.
"It is the sustaining of policy and principles over the hours which is the true mark of leadership and potential governance."
It can't legislate its law and order failings away David DavisShadow Home Secretary
Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said the Conservatives were voting against the bill because it was a move to more centralised government control - which was "bad in its own right".
But he also said that with the Home Office already "struggling to cope... that sort of over-centralisation is a recipe for disaster, something the home secretary might recognise."
He added that the bill would introduce the third Probation Service restructuring in six years - "it is impossible to improve service delivery in this way."
The bill would also be a "distraction" from other problems such as prison over-crowding and reoffending rates, Mr Davis said.
"This government can still not learn one self-evident truth: It can't legislate its law and order failings away."
'Poaching' staff
The government earlier won a vote on an amendment tabled by Labour MP Neil Gerrard which would have excluded firms and voluntary groups from carrying out "core" probation tasks.
MPs voted by 267 to 111 for the amendment - a majority of 156.
During Wednesday's debate, Mr Gerrard said companies with no experience of handling offenders would end up "poaching" staff from the Probation Service.
"What we end up with is a mass of different providers and we lose a national service and you start to get fragmentation then."What we end up with is a mass of different providers and we lose a national service and you start to get fragmentation then.
"It is very much more difficult then to control what is going on and we lose all the local connections that are there at the moment.""It is very much more difficult then to control what is going on and we lose all the local connections that are there at the moment."
Voting tight
With the Liberal Democrats opposed to all of the bill and the Conservatives opposed to large parts of it, the parliamentary arithmetic will be tight on its third reading in the Commons, according to BBC political correspondent James Hardy.
Mr Blair has a majority of 62, meaning 31 Labour MPs are needed to vote against it to bring about a defeat.
It is not about killing off the Probation Service, it is about supporting the work of probation officers Gerry SutcliffeHome Office Minister
The government has tabled its own amendment to exclude the writing of court reports on offenders from the provisions of the Bill, but it is thought this is unlikely to pacify opponents.
Home Secretary John Reid is attempting to win over Labour backbenchers.
Home Office Minister Gerry Sutcliffe told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "We have a list of voluntary sector bodies who say they can help us cut reoffending. I think it would be criminal if we did not allow them to.
"It is not about killing off the Probation Service, it is about supporting the work of probation officers but supplementing that through other providers.
"I can't see for the life in me why people would want to stop those organisations being involved."