This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/business/8471961.stm
The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 2 | Version 3 |
---|---|
Court tells Sky to cut ITV stake | Court tells Sky to cut ITV stake |
(10 minutes later) | |
The pay-TV group BSkyB has been ordered to reduce its stake in rival ITV by a UK court. | The pay-TV group BSkyB has been ordered to reduce its stake in rival ITV by a UK court. |
BSkyB lost its appeal to keep the 17.9% share and was told to reduce it to below 7.5%. | BSkyB lost its appeal to keep the 17.9% share and was told to reduce it to below 7.5%. |
It bought the stake for £940m in 2006, effectively blocking NTL, now Virgin Media, from buying ITV. | It bought the stake for £940m in 2006, effectively blocking NTL, now Virgin Media, from buying ITV. |
The Competition Commission had already ruled that Sky's stake gave it undue influence in the UK media and was not in the public interest. | The Competition Commission had already ruled that Sky's stake gave it undue influence in the UK media and was not in the public interest. |
BSkyB said: "We will review the judgement and order carefully and consider next steps in due course." | |
The satellite broadcaster has previously argued that it is not breaking UK media ownership laws because the stake is less than 20%. | |
The company maintains the deal was an investment and not designed to stop ITV being bought by rival NTL. | The company maintains the deal was an investment and not designed to stop ITV being bought by rival NTL. |
BSkyB could still challenge the ruling in the Supreme Court. | BSkyB could still challenge the ruling in the Supreme Court. |
Further hearing? | Further hearing? |
The broadcaster has fought to retain its stake since the Competition Commission decided in late 2007 that the purchase could be against the public interest. | |
Early in 2008 the Business Secretary, John Denham, upheld the decision the following month, and the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) did likewise in September 2008. | |
In March 2009 the case went to the Court of Appeal for hearing, leading to the latest court decision. | In March 2009 the case went to the Court of Appeal for hearing, leading to the latest court decision. |
"After three years of challenges by Sky, the Court of Appeal's decision should now bring this matter to a close, " a Virgin Media spokesman said. | "After three years of challenges by Sky, the Court of Appeal's decision should now bring this matter to a close, " a Virgin Media spokesman said. |
"The court's judgement reaffirms the prior rulings... that Sky's 17.9% stake in ITV is anti-competitive. We hope Sky now reduces its stake in ITV without further delay" he added. | "The court's judgement reaffirms the prior rulings... that Sky's 17.9% stake in ITV is anti-competitive. We hope Sky now reduces its stake in ITV without further delay" he added. |
Giving his ruling, Lord Justice Lloyd refused permission to take the case to the Supreme Court but Sky can apply directly to that court for a hearing. | Giving his ruling, Lord Justice Lloyd refused permission to take the case to the Supreme Court but Sky can apply directly to that court for a hearing. |