This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/scotland/glasgow_and_west/8495807.stm
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Inspection 'failures' over crash | |
(about 1 hour later) | |
Network Rail has been blamed for a catalogue of inspection failures over a bridge collapse which caused a freight train to derail in Ayrshire. | |
The train, which was carrying kerosene, gas oil and diesel, came off the rails south of Stewarton on 27 January 2009. | The train, which was carrying kerosene, gas oil and diesel, came off the rails south of Stewarton on 27 January 2009. |
The Rail Accident Investigation Branch said corrosion in the bridge's girders meant it could not support heavy loads. | The Rail Accident Investigation Branch said corrosion in the bridge's girders meant it could not support heavy loads. |
Its report criticises Network Rail's maintenance regime for the bridge and says corrosion went unidentified. | |
Six of the 10 wagons came off the rails during the incident and some caught fire, causing flames to shoot 50ft into the air. | |
Power lines were also brought down and the nearby A735 was closed. It took the emergency services several hours to bring the fire under control. | |
The resultant leakage of fuel contaminated local waterways, causing harm to wildlife. | |
The crash happened to the south of Stewarton, East Ayrshire | |
In the immediate aftermath, it was thought that the derailment had caused the bridge to collapse. | |
But in its report, the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) said the bridge - referred to as bridge 88 - had failed under the weight of the train, causing it to derail. | |
The report states: "The immediate cause of the derailment was the collapse of the bridge that followed the catastrophic structural failure of its east and centre main girders. | |
"Heavy corrosion had so significantly weakened these main girders that they were no longer able to carry the loading from trains that were permitted to run over the bridge." | |
The report criticises Network Rail's maintenance regime for the bridge and said "hidden corrosion" had gone unidentified. | |
'Lack of action' | |
It states that "no arrangements had been made to inspect the hidden parts of the east and centre main girders" where the heavy corrosion had occurred. | |
Corroded parts of the bridge were "not fully repaired" when the bridge was waterproofed in 1987. | |
The report also states that the bridge superstructure was not re-painted when the waterproofing work was done, or afterwards. | |
The RAIB also said there had been a "lack of action" after corrosion was highlighted in an urgent defect report in October 2003. | |
It recommends that Network Rail undertakes "checks and intervention action" on other bridges "that may be at risk because of similar hidden corrosion issues or erroneous assessment findings". | |
The operator of Britain's rail infrastructure is also urged to improve its "methods and processes for the examination of hidden critical parts of structures" and its management of the information used for making decisions about the structural safety of its bridges. |