This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/6429371.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Government considers Lords vote Straw 'means business' on Lords
(about 1 hour later)
The government is considering its next move after MPs voted to create a fully elected, rather than appointed, House of Lords. Commons leader Jack Straw says the government "means business" on House of Lords reform after MPs indicated they want its members elected in future.
The surprise result saw a majority of 113 call for the historic reform. The 113 majority for all members of a reformed Lords being elected rather than appointed, surprised many.
Leader of the Commons Jack Straw said he was "delighted" at the outcome, but has previously called for the second chamber to be only partly elected. The vote was "indicative", not binding on ministers, whose favoured option had been 50% elected and 50% appointed.
The MPs' vote is not binding on the government, but Mr Straw said their opinion would be taken into account. But Mr Straw said: "There is a momentum behind change - we cannot put the genie back in the bottle."
MPs, allowed more than one choice, also voted by a majority of 38 for 80% of members of a reformed second chamber being elected and the rest appointed. LORDS REFORM VOTING All appointed house - rejected by 179 votes20% elected - rejected, no vote40% elected - rejected, no voteHalf elected/half appointed - rejected by 263 votes60% elected - rejected by 214 votes80% elected - backed by 38 votesAll elected - backed by 113 votes class="" href="/1/hi/uk_politics/6428063.stm">Analysis: Will it happen?
LORDS REFORM VOTING All appointed house - rejected by 179 votes20% elected - rejected, no vote40% elected - rejected, no voteHalf elected/half appointed - rejected by 263 votes60% elected - rejected by 214 votes80% elected - backed by 38 votesAll elected - backed by 113 votes Mr Straw told BBC Radio 4's Today he would now consult colleagues and opposition parties on "how we can take forward" the 100% elected or 80% elected options, which had also had a majority - of 38 - in favour.
Mr Straw had put forward nine options, with the rest rejected by MPs. He called the MPs' decisions a "pretty seismic shift" in favour of reform: "This is the first time there's been a clear view on this for 98 years, so it's progress.
He pledged to bring a cross-party group together to discuss the next stage of reform.
Prime Minister Tony Blair voted in favour of a 50/50 split between elected and appointed members - also Mr Straw's preferred choice - but not for any other proposal.
Mr Straw told the BBC that MPs' decisions represented a "pretty seismic shift", saying: "The message was a very decisive and clear one in favour of reform of the existing House of Lords."
He added: "This is the first time there's been a clear view on this for 98 years, so it's progress.
"I mean business, so does the government and so, I think, do the other parties.""I mean business, so does the government and so, I think, do the other parties."
The votes follow two days of debate in the Commons. He said that now there had been a decision in principle backing Lords reform they would be looking at taking "practical steps towards a draft bill".
HAVE YOUR SAY An accident of birth should never entitle someone to pass the laws of this land Neil Small, East Kilbride class="" href="http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?threadID=5735&edition=1&ttl=20070307204156">Send us your comments Shadow Commons leader Theresa May said: "The House of Commons has clearly expressed a preference for a substantially or wholly elected House of Lords. A previous attempt to reform the Lords in 2003 failed when MPs failed to agree on how much of the second chamber should be elected and how much appointed.
In an attempt to build a consensus MPs had a series of votes on Wednesday - ranging from an all-appointed to all-elected house, and various proportions in-between.
Reform plans will be debated and voted on in the House of Lords next week. The idea of a fully elected Lords is widely expected to face opposition from peers.
Even if it was backed by the Lords the chances of reforms happening depends on what priority Chancellor Gordon Brown gives the issue if he becomes prime minister as expected this summer. Mr Brown voted for an 80% elected and 20% appointed upper house
HAVE YOUR SAY An accident of birth should never entitle someone to pass the laws of this land Neil Small, East Kilbride Send us your comments
There have been suggestions that the majority in favour of a wholly elected Lords was swollen by opponents of reforms who wanted to scupper the plans by ensuring an option unacceptable to the government and/or Lords was chosen.
Shadow Commons leader Theresa May said: "The House of Commons has clearly expressed a preference for a substantially or wholly elected House of Lords.
"But this is only a first step and indeed it raises further questions. Given the tactical voting tonight we now need to establish what the House of Commons' settled view is.""But this is only a first step and indeed it raises further questions. Given the tactical voting tonight we now need to establish what the House of Commons' settled view is."
'Momentous step''Momentous step'
Liberal Democrat leader Sir Menzies Campbell said: "This is a truly historic occasion. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Menzies Campbell said it marked "a famous victory for progressive opinion".
"After nearly 100 years the House of Commons has at last taken the momentous step to reform the upper house and make it fit for a modern democracy. The reform plans outlined by Jack Straw last month are for a new, smaller, second chamber of Parliament, no longer called the Lords, whose members would be elected or appointed for 15 year terms. They would not have to be peers.
Its powers would remain largely the same as at present - as a revising chamber which can "improve" or delay plans passed by the government on the day in the Commons, but which cannot actually block legislation.
REFORM PROPOSALS A 'hybrid' of elected and appointed peersReduce size of House from 746 to 540 membersEnd hereditary and life peerages over timeElected peers to be voted in at same time as Euro electionsMaximum time in office of 15 years for elected and appointed peersAppointees a mixture of party politicians and non-party figuresLords may be renamed - possibly 'The Reformed Chamber'Anglican bishops and archbishops to keep seats Plans at-a-glance Full text of White PaperREFORM PROPOSALS A 'hybrid' of elected and appointed peersReduce size of House from 746 to 540 membersEnd hereditary and life peerages over timeElected peers to be voted in at same time as Euro electionsMaximum time in office of 15 years for elected and appointed peersAppointees a mixture of party politicians and non-party figuresLords may be renamed - possibly 'The Reformed Chamber'Anglican bishops and archbishops to keep seats Plans at-a-glance Full text of White Paper
"This is a famous victory for progressive opinion both in Parliament and in the country." One of the fears of those who oppose having a substantially elected second chamber - especially if as proposed it uses a form of proportional representation - is that its members will feel that being elected gives it the authority to challenge the will of the Commons.
The last time the Commons voted on Lords reform, in 2003, all options were rejected. Conservative peer Baroness Fookes said: "The House (of Lords) will not be content with limited powers. They will push and push for more if they are wholly elected. If we have these ping pong matches head to head why should they give way?"
At the moment all peers are appointed, apart from the 92 hereditary peers who survived the first phase of Lords reform during Tony Blair's first term in office. At the moment all peers are appointed, apart from the 92 hereditary peers who survived the first phase of Lords reform during Tony Blair's first term in office, and Church of England Bishops.
In another vote, MPs decided by a majority of 280 to remove the remaining hereditaries.In another vote, MPs decided by a majority of 280 to remove the remaining hereditaries.
The House of Lords debates the reform proposals next week.