This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/8498095.stm
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 2 | Version 3 |
---|---|
Tory crime figures 'misleading' | Tory crime figures 'misleading' |
(about 2 hours later) | |
Shadow home secretary Chris Grayling has been accused of misleading the public in his use of crime statistics. | Shadow home secretary Chris Grayling has been accused of misleading the public in his use of crime statistics. |
The Tories have said data shows a big rise in violent crime during Labour's time in government - but the way the figures were compiled changed in 2002. | The Tories have said data shows a big rise in violent crime during Labour's time in government - but the way the figures were compiled changed in 2002. |
Now the chairman of the UK Statistics Authority has told Mr Grayling his statements are "likely to damage public trust in official statistics". | Now the chairman of the UK Statistics Authority has told Mr Grayling his statements are "likely to damage public trust in official statistics". |
Mr Grayling has denied "airbrushing" the statistics to suit his cause. | Mr Grayling has denied "airbrushing" the statistics to suit his cause. |
I must take issue with what you said yesterday about violent crime statistics, which seems to me likely to damage public trust in official statistics Sir Michael Scholar's letter to the Conservatives | |
But Home Secretary Alan Johnson has said his opposite number should apologise. | |
Mr Grayling had to defend his position on Wednesday after the Conservatives sent the figures to activists in constituencies throughout England and Wales in an effort to demonstrate the government's failure on law and order. | |
The BBC's home editor Mark Easton said the method of recording violent crime had changed in 2002, making the figures for the periods before and after that date non-comparable. | The BBC's home editor Mark Easton said the method of recording violent crime had changed in 2002, making the figures for the periods before and after that date non-comparable. |
Now Sir Michael Scholar, chairman of the UK Statistics Authority, has written to Mr Grayling saying: "I do not wish to become involved in political controversy, but I must take issue with what you said yesterday about violent crime statistics, which seems to me likely to damage public trust in official statistics." | Now Sir Michael Scholar, chairman of the UK Statistics Authority, has written to Mr Grayling saying: "I do not wish to become involved in political controversy, but I must take issue with what you said yesterday about violent crime statistics, which seems to me likely to damage public trust in official statistics." |
MARK EASTON'S UK class="" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markeaston/2010/02/grayling_crime_stats.html">See the letter in full and comment on Mark Easton's blog | |
In notes attached to the letter, the statistics authority said it regarded "a comparison, without qualification, of police recorded statistics between the late 1990s and 2008/09 as likely to mislead the public". | In notes attached to the letter, the statistics authority said it regarded "a comparison, without qualification, of police recorded statistics between the late 1990s and 2008/09 as likely to mislead the public". |
The authority said the British Crime Survey (BCS), an annual questionnaire of 46,000 people, indicated there had been a big fall in violent crime since 1995. | The authority said the British Crime Survey (BCS), an annual questionnaire of 46,000 people, indicated there had been a big fall in violent crime since 1995. |
It said the BCS was the most reliable way of assessing the trend, because it was "not affected by changes in reporting, police recording and local policing activity, and has been measuring crime in a consistent way since the survey began in 1981". | It said the BCS was the most reliable way of assessing the trend, because it was "not affected by changes in reporting, police recording and local policing activity, and has been measuring crime in a consistent way since the survey began in 1981". |
Responding to Sir Michael's letter, Mr Grayling said he would "take account" of his comments regarding the 2002 change in procedures. | |
'Talking Britain down' | |
However, he said he would continue to use recorded crime statistics as they showed the "number of violent crimes reported to police stations and, particularly serious violent crimes, has increased substantially over the past decade". | |
The home secretary claimed the Conservatives had "plenty of form" when it came to the use of statistics for political ends. | |
"Now it has been confirmed officially that they have continually misled the public about crime." | |
This is not the first time the statistics body has taken politicians to task for their use and interpretation of crime-related figures. | |
In 2008, it criticised Labour ministers for releasing what it said was "premature and selective" data about hospital admissions for knife wounds in certain parts of the country. The then Home Secretary Jacqui Smith apologised for the early release. |