This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/wiltshire/8500218.stm

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Hammer attack boy refused damages Hammer attack boy refused damages
(10 minutes later)
A teenager who was left brain damaged in a claw hammer attack at his school has lost his battle for compensation at the High Court in London.A teenager who was left brain damaged in a claw hammer attack at his school has lost his battle for compensation at the High Court in London.
Henry Webster, now 18, brought the legal action against Ridgeway School in Wroughton, Wiltshire, where he was assaulted by a gang in January 2007.Henry Webster, now 18, brought the legal action against Ridgeway School in Wroughton, Wiltshire, where he was assaulted by a gang in January 2007.
The school denied being negligent as the attack happened after school hours.The school denied being negligent as the attack happened after school hours.
Thirteen people, including young teenagers, were convicted over the assault and jailed last year. Thirteen people, including teenagers, were convicted over the assault and given custodial sentences last year.
Skull fracturesSkull fractures
Mr Webster's legal team argued there was a negligent failure by the school to maintain proper discipline and deal with racial tension. Mr Webster was 15 when he was punched, kicked and hit with a claw hammer by a group of Asian pupils and young men on the school's tennis courts.
He suffered three skull fractures.
His legal team argued there was a negligent failure by the school to maintain proper discipline and deal with racial tension.
Mr Webster's mother Elizabeth, 14-year-old brother Joseph and stepfather Roger Durnford, of Beranburh Field, Wroughton, were also seeking compensation for the trauma of witnessing his injuries but their claims will now also fail.Mr Webster's mother Elizabeth, 14-year-old brother Joseph and stepfather Roger Durnford, of Beranburh Field, Wroughton, were also seeking compensation for the trauma of witnessing his injuries but their claims will now also fail.
The shock of seeing him lying in a pool of blood must have been traumatic for his brother, mother and stepfather Mr Justice NicolThe shock of seeing him lying in a pool of blood must have been traumatic for his brother, mother and stepfather Mr Justice Nicol
In his ruling, Mr Justice Nicol said the school did not breach its duty to take reasonable care to keep Mr Webster reasonably safe while on its premises.In his ruling, Mr Justice Nicol said the school did not breach its duty to take reasonable care to keep Mr Webster reasonably safe while on its premises.
He said that Mr Webster was the victim of a "brutal and criminal attack, which was very nearly fatal and left him with serious injuries".He said that Mr Webster was the victim of a "brutal and criminal attack, which was very nearly fatal and left him with serious injuries".
"Those immediately responsible have been prosecuted and punished," he said."Those immediately responsible have been prosecuted and punished," he said.
"If they had any money, they could also be sued in the civil courts.
"No-one, let alone an innocent 15-year-old boy, should have had to put up with the pain and suffering that he has had to endure."No-one, let alone an innocent 15-year-old boy, should have had to put up with the pain and suffering that he has had to endure.
"The shock of seeing him lying in a pool of blood must have been traumatic for his brother, mother and stepfather."The shock of seeing him lying in a pool of blood must have been traumatic for his brother, mother and stepfather.
'Deeply disappointed'
"Yet the sympathy which everyone must feel for the claimants cannot determine whether the Ridgeway School is liable to pay them compensation.""Yet the sympathy which everyone must feel for the claimants cannot determine whether the Ridgeway School is liable to pay them compensation."
'Deeply disappointed'
He concluded that, while "it is more likely than not" that race did play an important part in the motivation of four of the boys involved the attack, it did not take the Websters very far as they could not show that any breach was causative of the injury to Mr Webster.
Peter Lay, chairman of governors at the school, said: "We believe the fact that all eight points with which liability was argued were dismissed by the judge vindicates the school in defeating the suggestion that the event was caused by failure on the school's part."
The Webster family, who were not in court on Friday, said in a statement they were "deeply shocked and disappointed" at the judge's decision.The Webster family, who were not in court on Friday, said in a statement they were "deeply shocked and disappointed" at the judge's decision.
"We are in the process of analysing and coming to terms with the judge's analysis," they said."We are in the process of analysing and coming to terms with the judge's analysis," they said.
"We must express our immense gratitude to all of the individuals who gave their time to come to court and give evidence on Henry's part.""We must express our immense gratitude to all of the individuals who gave their time to come to court and give evidence on Henry's part."
Mr Webster was 15 when he was repeatedly punched, kicked and hit with the sharp end of a claw hammer.
He suffered three skull fractures.
Thirteen people were convicted in 2008 of being involved in the attack and given sentences ranging from eight months to eight years.Thirteen people were convicted in 2008 of being involved in the attack and given sentences ranging from eight months to eight years.