This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/8561359.stm

The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 9 Version 10
Four plead not guilty on expenses Four deny charges over expenses
(30 minutes later)
Three MPs and a peer have pleaded not guilty in court to charges related to their expenses claims. Three MPs and a peer have said they are pleading not guilty in court to charges related to their expenses claims.
Jim Devine, Elliot Morley, David Chaytor and Lord Hanningfield all told Westminster magistrates they denied theft by false accounting.Jim Devine, Elliot Morley, David Chaytor and Lord Hanningfield all told Westminster magistrates they denied theft by false accounting.
All four were released on unconditional bail and will appear at Southwark Crown Court on 30 March.All four were released on unconditional bail and will appear at Southwark Crown Court on 30 March.
The MPs are all suspended by the Labour Party, while Lord Hanningfield has been suspended by the Conservatives.The MPs are all suspended by the Labour Party, while Lord Hanningfield has been suspended by the Conservatives.
Police began investigating after details of all MPs' expenses claims were leaked to the Daily Telegraph.Police began investigating after details of all MPs' expenses claims were leaked to the Daily Telegraph.
PrivilegePrivilege
The four appeared after being charged last month with false accounting in relation to their expenses claims.The four appeared after being charged last month with false accounting in relation to their expenses claims.
They face charges under section 17 of the Theft Act 1968 and if found guilty they face a maximum sentence of seven years' imprisonment.They face charges under section 17 of the Theft Act 1968 and if found guilty they face a maximum sentence of seven years' imprisonment.
At the time charges were brought, the three MPs said they "totally refute any charges that we have committed an offence". Barrister for the three MPs Julian Knowles said in a statement handed out to reporters outside the court his clients "unequivocally and steadfastly maintain their innocence of the charges against them".
He is devastated to be in this position Spokesman for Lord HanningfieldHe is devastated to be in this position Spokesman for Lord Hanningfield
A statement from their lawyers following their court appearance on Thursday said: "The MPs maintain that to prosecute them in criminal court for their Parliamentary activities would infringe the principle of the separation of powers and Parliamentary privilege." "They also maintain that to prosecute them in the criminal courts for Parliamentary activities would infringe the principle of the separation of powers, which is one of the principles which underpin the UK's constitutional structure.
"The principle of the separation of powers means that whatever matter arises concerning the workings of Parliament should be dealt with by Parliament and not elsewhere and should be dealt with in a manner that is consistent with the way other members have been treated."
Parliamentary privilege traditionally guarantees MPs and peers immunity from slander laws for statements in Parliamentary debate and also relates to access to the Parliamentary buildings.Parliamentary privilege traditionally guarantees MPs and peers immunity from slander laws for statements in Parliamentary debate and also relates to access to the Parliamentary buildings.
Lord Hanningfield also made a statement after the hearing, via his spokesman Mark Spragg, who said the peer had "devoted the last 40 years of his life to public service". Mr Knowles added that his clients were not "saying that they are above the law", but were arguing against the process they were facing.
Lord Hanningfield made a statement after the hearing, via his spokesman Mark Spragg, who said the peer had "devoted the last 40 years of his life to public service".
"He is devastated to be in this position. He feels he has been singled out. He does not believe that he has done anything dishonest.""He is devastated to be in this position. He feels he has been singled out. He does not believe that he has done anything dishonest."