This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8681624.stm

The article has changed 19 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Adonis condemns dissolution block Adonis condemns dissolution block
(40 minutes later)
The coalition government's move to make it harder to dissolve Parliament is a "constitutional outrage", ex-Transport Secretary Lord Adonis has said.The coalition government's move to make it harder to dissolve Parliament is a "constitutional outrage", ex-Transport Secretary Lord Adonis has said.
The Lib Dem-Tory plan will mean that 55% of MPs must approve such a move to get it through the House of Commons.The Lib Dem-Tory plan will mean that 55% of MPs must approve such a move to get it through the House of Commons.
Labour's Lord Adonis said it raised doubts over the coalition's legitimacy.Labour's Lord Adonis said it raised doubts over the coalition's legitimacy.
But Lib Dem Andrew Stunell, who helped frame the deal, said it was needed to prevent an "ambush" on the Tories by all the other parties. Foreign Secretary William Hague defended the move, saying it was necessary to give plans for a fixed-term parliaments "credibility".
Liberal Democrat MP Andrew Stunell, who helped frame the deal, said it was needed to prevent an "ambush" on the Tories by all the other parties.
The coalition agreement between the Lib Dems and Conservatives promises a "strong and stable" government, with elections held on fixed dates every five years.The coalition agreement between the Lib Dems and Conservatives promises a "strong and stable" government, with elections held on fixed dates every five years.
'Ganging up''Ganging up'
The raising of the threshold for a dissolution vote is intended to prevent a move to hold an election earlier than that.The raising of the threshold for a dissolution vote is intended to prevent a move to hold an election earlier than that.
The Conservatives currently have 306 out of 649 MPs - a 47% share.The Conservatives currently have 306 out of 649 MPs - a 47% share.
One seat, Thirsk and Malton, is empty, pending a by-election on 27 May, while Sinn Fein's five MPs have not taken the oath of allegiance allowing them to sit in Parliament.One seat, Thirsk and Malton, is empty, pending a by-election on 27 May, while Sinn Fein's five MPs have not taken the oath of allegiance allowing them to sit in Parliament.
It would be impossible for opponents, even if fully united, to muster the 55% needed to dissolve Parliament, unless at least 16 Tories rebelled against their party leadership.It would be impossible for opponents, even if fully united, to muster the 55% needed to dissolve Parliament, unless at least 16 Tories rebelled against their party leadership.
Lord Adonis said: "This is a brazen attempt to gerrymander the constitution which calls into question the legitimacy of the coalition from day one.Lord Adonis said: "This is a brazen attempt to gerrymander the constitution which calls into question the legitimacy of the coalition from day one.
"If the legislation ever gets to the House of Lords, it will meet opposition of an intensity and bitterness not seen for many years. This is a constitutional outrage.""If the legislation ever gets to the House of Lords, it will meet opposition of an intensity and bitterness not seen for many years. This is a constitutional outrage."
We have a quasi-presidential system here, without the checks and balances Charles WalkerConservative MP for BroxbourneWe have a quasi-presidential system here, without the checks and balances Charles WalkerConservative MP for Broxbourne
Labour former cabinet ministers Jack Straw and David Blunkett also condemned the move.Labour former cabinet ministers Jack Straw and David Blunkett also condemned the move.
Mr Straw said the plan was "completely undemocratic and totally unworkable" while Mr Blunkett described it as a "stitch-up".Mr Straw said the plan was "completely undemocratic and totally unworkable" while Mr Blunkett described it as a "stitch-up".
"If Labour had attempted something like this in government, the Lib Dems, in particular, would have been incandescent", he said."If Labour had attempted something like this in government, the Lib Dems, in particular, would have been incandescent", he said.
Labour former Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer - a supporter of fixed-term parliaments told BBC Newsnight he feared it would result in a "zombie government".Labour former Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer - a supporter of fixed-term parliaments told BBC Newsnight he feared it would result in a "zombie government".
He said: "Assume 53% of Parliament vote against the Conservatives - that's what all the other parties equal excluding the Conservatives - they can't be removed.He said: "Assume 53% of Parliament vote against the Conservatives - that's what all the other parties equal excluding the Conservatives - they can't be removed.
"So if that were to happen a year before the last date for a general election we would have a... zombie government.""So if that were to happen a year before the last date for a general election we would have a... zombie government."
'Safeguard''Safeguard'
However, Mr Stunell, the Lib Dem MP for Hazel Grove, told BBC Radio 4's PM programme: "What the prime minister has given up with a fixed-term parliament is the right to go to the Queen at any moment and just call a general election. Obviously that's what a fixed-term parliament stops.However, Mr Stunell, the Lib Dem MP for Hazel Grove, told BBC Radio 4's PM programme: "What the prime minister has given up with a fixed-term parliament is the right to go to the Queen at any moment and just call a general election. Obviously that's what a fixed-term parliament stops.
"On the other hand, if your threshold for a special case is only 50%, in theory it would be possible for the Tories to be ambushed by other parties, including the Liberal Democrats, ganging up against them..."On the other hand, if your threshold for a special case is only 50%, in theory it would be possible for the Tories to be ambushed by other parties, including the Liberal Democrats, ganging up against them...
"Although nobody in the partnership has any intention of doing any such thing, it was a small matter for us to say 'No, we accept your concerns and if we raise that threshold to 55%.'"Although nobody in the partnership has any intention of doing any such thing, it was a small matter for us to say 'No, we accept your concerns and if we raise that threshold to 55%.'
Who's Who: New government At-a-glance: Coalition policies Cameron in Scotland for SNP talks
"That gives you the safeguard you want and that's the way we've proceeded.""That gives you the safeguard you want and that's the way we've proceeded."
Foreign Secretary William Hague also defended the move, calling it a considered "constitutional innovation."
But he said "Once you agree that there should be a fixed-term parliament, it is only fixed-term if there is some provision to really give it credibility to make it hard to dissolve parliament, other than exceptional circumstances, part way through its five-year term."
Charles Walker, Conservative MP for Broxbourne, said: "It is for Parliament to decide when it's lost confidence in the government and I think we have to look at this very closely...Charles Walker, Conservative MP for Broxbourne, said: "It is for Parliament to decide when it's lost confidence in the government and I think we have to look at this very closely...
"This is perhaps just a little too much for our unwritten constitution to bear.""This is perhaps just a little too much for our unwritten constitution to bear."
He added: "Parliament actually runs this country, not the prime minister. Over the past 100 years, Parliament has given away huge powers to the prime minister.He added: "Parliament actually runs this country, not the prime minister. Over the past 100 years, Parliament has given away huge powers to the prime minister.
"We have a quasi-presidential system here, without the checks and balances. This would be the loss of an enormous check.""We have a quasi-presidential system here, without the checks and balances. This would be the loss of an enormous check."