This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/education/10521289.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Sats boycott in '25% of schools' Sats boycott in '25% of schools'
(about 3 hours later)
The tests are compulsory in EnglandThe tests are compulsory in England
A quarter of England's primary schools took part in this year's boycott of the national school tests known as Sats, data suggests. A quarter of England's primary schools took part in the teachers' union boycott of Sats tests earlier this year.
Nearly three-quarters of schools administered the compulsory tests, the Department for Education said.Nearly three-quarters of schools administered the compulsory tests, the Department for Education said.
Education Secretary Michael Gove said there were "flaws" in the testing system and that it would be reviewed, but they would go ahead next year.Education Secretary Michael Gove said there were "flaws" in the testing system and that it would be reviewed, but they would go ahead next year.
Many schools say the tests are too crude a measure of their performance. Many teachers say the tests are too crude a measure of pupil performance.
They object to the use of the data in national league tables. In particular, they object to how the test results are used in league tables.
About 600,000 10 and 11-year-olds were due to take the national schools tests in May.About 600,000 10 and 11-year-olds were due to take the national schools tests in May.
But members of the National Association of Head Teachers and the National Union of Teachers voted to boycott the tests.But members of the National Association of Head Teachers and the National Union of Teachers voted to boycott the tests.
Boycott patchyBoycott patchy
The tests, introduced in the mid-1990s, were brought in to enable national comparisons of schools' and pupils' progress over time, and against each other. The tests, introduced in the mid-1990s, were brought in to enable comparisons of primary schools and pupils.
The unions say the tests are bad for children's education - because teachers are forced to "teach to the test" and concentrate so much on the "three Rs", squeezing other subjects out. These unions say the tests are bad for children's education - because teachers spend so much time preparing for the tests that it squeezes out other lessons.
They are also deeply opposed to the league tables drawn up from the results of the tests.They are also deeply opposed to the league tables drawn up from the results of the tests.
Anecdotal advice suggested observance of the boycott was patchy. But teachers' unions were divided over the protest - with the NASUWT teachers' union rejecting the boycott.
Some schools completely refused to carry out the tests and carried out other activities instead. Both the Labour party, which was in office at the time of the tests, and the Conservative party, criticised the boycott.
Among schools who took part in the boycott, some schools completely refused to carry out the tests and carried out other activities instead.
Others used previous years' papers so that they could monitor their own pupils' progress without the information being used for national league tables.Others used previous years' papers so that they could monitor their own pupils' progress without the information being used for national league tables.
All the political parties said they were against a boycott of this year's tests.