This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/education-11510466

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
The upper limit on tuition fees 'should be removed' The upper limit on tuition fees 'should be removed'
(40 minutes later)
By Sean Coughlan BBC News education correspondentBy Sean Coughlan BBC News education correspondent
Universities in England should have no upper limit on tuition fees, Lord Browne's review is set to recommend.Universities in England should have no upper limit on tuition fees, Lord Browne's review is set to recommend.
But government support will only be guaranteed up to a maximum of £7,000 per year - which is likely to make this the upper fee for most universities.But government support will only be guaranteed up to a maximum of £7,000 per year - which is likely to make this the upper fee for most universities.
This would mean more than doubling the current tuition fee of £3,290.This would mean more than doubling the current tuition fee of £3,290.
Universities will be able to charge above this limit - if they share the financial burden of higher loans to students.Universities will be able to charge above this limit - if they share the financial burden of higher loans to students.
This would mean a three-year degree costing students £21,000 or more - with many also likely to face a higher rate of interest for loan repayments.
Universities UK president, Steve Smith, says that universities face such deep budget cuts in the forthcoming spending review that an increase in fees to £7,000 would only replace the money that the government is about to withdraw.
"This is transferring the cost from the state to the student," said Professor Smith.
'Two tier system'
The Million+ group of new universities warned that this would create a "two-tier university system, with one set of universities for the rich and one set of universities for everybody else".
Lord Browne's review of university funding in England is set to deliver its recommendations to the government on Tuesday.Lord Browne's review of university funding in England is set to deliver its recommendations to the government on Tuesday.
It appears likely that it will advise ministers to scrap the current upper limit on tuition fees, introducing a market in what students can be charged.It appears likely that it will advise ministers to scrap the current upper limit on tuition fees, introducing a market in what students can be charged.
However the proposed funding mechanism will only fully underwrite the cost of fees up to £7,000 per year.However the proposed funding mechanism will only fully underwrite the cost of fees up to £7,000 per year.
Universities will be able to charge above this limit - but as fees rise above £7,000 they will only be allowed to keep a diminishing proportion of the higher charges.Universities will be able to charge above this limit - but as fees rise above £7,000 they will only be allowed to keep a diminishing proportion of the higher charges.
This is expected to act as a brake on raising fees above £7,000 - but the most sought-after courses in the most elite institutions would be expected to be able to charge higher fees.This is expected to act as a brake on raising fees above £7,000 - but the most sought-after courses in the most elite institutions would be expected to be able to charge higher fees.
The coalition government will have to respond to such far-reaching proposals.The coalition government will have to respond to such far-reaching proposals.
Business Secretary Vince Cable has already emphasised the importance of a "progressive" element to the student funding deal.Business Secretary Vince Cable has already emphasised the importance of a "progressive" element to the student funding deal.
This could either come in the Browne report or in the government's response - and could mean that higher-earning graduates will pay back their loans at a higher rate of interest.This could either come in the Browne report or in the government's response - and could mean that higher-earning graduates will pay back their loans at a higher rate of interest.
Transport Secretary Philip Hammond, speaking on the Andrew Marr Show, said this could mean that "those with the lowest incomes have their interest rate effectively subsidised, while those on the highest incomes provide something additional to provide that subsidy". Transport Secretary Philip Hammond, speaking on the Andrew Marr Show, said this could mean "those with the lowest incomes have their interest rate effectively subsidised".
But the raising of tuition fees will present deep political challenges to the Liberal Democrats.
The party's MPs, including leader Nick Clegg, signed personal pledges at the election to vote against any increase in tuition fees - and any attempt to reverse this will bring them under pressure from students and their own grassroots supporters.
The Liberal Youth group has already called for party members to mobilise against such a tuition fee increase.
Students have warned against a "betrayal" of election pledges on tuition fees - and have circulated a photograph showing Nick Clegg and his signed pledge.
Labour leader Ed Miliband has reached out to potential tuition fee rebels among Lib Dem MPs - saying that he will work with anyone wanting a more "progressive" student finance system.
Les Ebdon, chair of the Million+ group of universities, warned of a socially-divided university system.
"Only the most socially elite universities could charge fees of £7,000 while universities with a high proportion of students from poorer families will feel unable to charge fees at such a high level.
"It is hard to see how this meets the government's stated aim of a fairer society."