This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/business-11638825

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Minister may allow changes to UK air security checks Minister may allow changes to UK air security checks
(40 minutes later)
The transport secretary has signalled his willingness to change the regulations on security checks at British airports.The transport secretary has signalled his willingness to change the regulations on security checks at British airports.
Philip Hammond was responding to senior figures in the airline industry who had backed the BA chairman's attack on measures imposed by the US.Philip Hammond was responding to senior figures in the airline industry who had backed the BA chairman's attack on measures imposed by the US.
Martin Broughton said many of the checks were "completely redundant".Martin Broughton said many of the checks were "completely redundant".
Mr Hammond said he would be allowing airlines to look at ways of "easing the passenger experience".Mr Hammond said he would be allowing airlines to look at ways of "easing the passenger experience".
He said: "What we are now going to do is give the airport operators both an incentive through the economic mechanism and the permission, through changing the regulations, to look at the way they do these security procedures and do them differently if they believe that that can reduce the queueing and ease the passenger experience." Some here might take issue with Martin Broughton's robust choice of language in describing US requirements of other countries.
As most Americans see it, their government is not asking other nations to "kowtow" - but rather to enter into a security partnership to avert terror attacks.
And from 9/11 to the shoe bomber to the alleged underwear bomber, there is enough precedent for Americans to feel broadly accepting of heightened security.
At US airports passengers are required to take off shoes, and remove laptops and liquids. So the discrepancy with procedures required for inbound flights from abroad may not be as great as the BA chairman implies.
Arguably, a more contentious issue here than security is public attitudes to Muslim travellers. Witness the recent sacking of an NPR radio commentator for saying he felt "nervous" upon seeing Muslim air passengers.
Mr Broughton had criticised the US for imposing increased checks on US-bound flights but not on its own domestic services, saying the UK should stop "kowtowing" to US security demands.
He said practices such as forcing passengers to take off their shoes should be abandoned, and questioned why laptop computers needed to be screened separately.
Responding to the BA chairman's comments, former head of policy at the US Department of Homeland Security, Stewart Baker, said practices such as taking shoes off and limiting the amount of liquids taken on board were in place on domestic flights in the US.
However Chris Yates, air security analyst at Jane's Information Group, said while a lot of measures were in place they were not applied consistently in all US airports.
Mr Baker said Mr Broughton was inferring that the UK was a 'US poodle', but that this was not the case.
"It does sound as though he was kind of venting, rather than engaged in a careful analysis. I've sort of learned that when Brits play the 'poodle card', it's more emotional than rational and it sounded like he was playing the poodle card."
Mr Hammond responded to the row by saying the government would give airport operators permission, through changing the regulations, to look at the way they carry out security procedures.
"[They can] do them differently if they believe that that can reduce the queuing and ease the passenger experience," he said.
But he said he could not order the US to relax restrictions on passengers travelling to the states.But he said he could not order the US to relax restrictions on passengers travelling to the states.
Mr Hammond said: "I have to defend the right of every country to define the security requirements that it places on flights entering its airspace. He added: "I have to defend the right of every country to define the security requirements that it places on flights entering its airspace."
"We all have a right to defend ourselves, the US probably more than any other state has reason to be fearful of terrorist attack and I wouldn't want to suggest that it's our place to tell the US what measures it imposes on flights going into US airspace," he added. Earlier Mike Carrivick, of BAR UK, which represents more than 80 airlines, said the industry should "step back and have a look at the whole situation".
He added: "Every time there is a new security scare, an extra layer is added on to procedures.
"We need to step back and have a look at the whole situation. Standards change fairly regularly and this puts pressure on airports and airlines. We need to decide what we are trying to do and how best to do it."
The US stepped up security in January in the wake of an alleged bomb plot.
It introduced tougher screening rules, including body pat-down searches and carry-on baggage checks, for passengers arriving from 14 nations which the authorities deem to be a security risk.
Passengers from any foreign country may also be checked at random.