This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/business/6559673.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Man recovers £35,988 from NatWest Man recovers £35,988 from NatWest
(about 1 hour later)
A businessman from Norfolk has recovered a record £35,987.94 from NatWest after accusing it of charging him unlawful overdraft fees.A businessman from Norfolk has recovered a record £35,987.94 from NatWest after accusing it of charging him unlawful overdraft fees.
The man, who wishes to remain anonymous, had challenged the fees that the bank had levied for bouncing cheques from his company.The man, who wishes to remain anonymous, had challenged the fees that the bank had levied for bouncing cheques from his company.
NatWest said it was settling the case only because its legal costs were becoming too high.NatWest said it was settling the case only because its legal costs were becoming too high.
It is just the latest example of a bank repaying such penalty charges.It is just the latest example of a bank repaying such penalty charges.
PayoutsPayouts
The businessman is one of a rapidly-growing number of people who have found that their bank has caved in to a claim for a refund of their current account charges, rather than let the case go to court for a full hearing.The businessman is one of a rapidly-growing number of people who have found that their bank has caved in to a claim for a refund of their current account charges, rather than let the case go to court for a full hearing.
It certainly is a spectacular payout Marc Gander, Consumer Action GroupIt certainly is a spectacular payout Marc Gander, Consumer Action Group
Campaigners claim that the banks have adopted this strategy because if they were ordered by a court to reveal just how much it actually costs to bounce a cheque, they would be forced to admit that it was in the region of £2, rather than the £25 to £30 unauthorised overdraft fee that is commonly charged.Campaigners claim that the banks have adopted this strategy because if they were ordered by a court to reveal just how much it actually costs to bounce a cheque, they would be forced to admit that it was in the region of £2, rather than the £25 to £30 unauthorised overdraft fee that is commonly charged.
"It certainly is a spectacular payout," said Marc Gander of the Consumer Action Group (CAG)."It certainly is a spectacular payout," said Marc Gander of the Consumer Action Group (CAG).
"It is the biggest one I know of so far that has been successful.""It is the biggest one I know of so far that has been successful."
Small businessesSmall businesses
The businessman in this case - who we shall call Bob - started his windows and conservatory business in 1999.The businessman in this case - who we shall call Bob - started his windows and conservatory business in 1999.
At times I was paying £2,000 to £3,000 a month in charges. I felt I was being ripped off Bob, Norfolk businessmanAt times I was paying £2,000 to £3,000 a month in charges. I felt I was being ripped off Bob, Norfolk businessman
Today it employs some 20 people and has an annual turnover of more than £1m, with a healthy bank balance.Today it employs some 20 people and has an annual turnover of more than £1m, with a healthy bank balance.
But in its early days the company experienced a common problem for small businesses that have just started up: cash flow.But in its early days the company experienced a common problem for small businesses that have just started up: cash flow.
There was little money available to fund the day-to-day costs of running the business, while waiting for customers' cheques to clear.There was little money available to fund the day-to-day costs of running the business, while waiting for customers' cheques to clear.
Bob says that the NatWest, which is owned by the Royal Bank of Scotland, would bounce his cheques or stop his direct debit payments when he tried to draw on money from customers whose cheques had not yet cleared.Bob says that the NatWest, which is owned by the Royal Bank of Scotland, would bounce his cheques or stop his direct debit payments when he tried to draw on money from customers whose cheques had not yet cleared.
Over 28 months, from 2000 to 2002, he was being charged fees on his account almost every week - and at £30 a time.Over 28 months, from 2000 to 2002, he was being charged fees on his account almost every week - and at £30 a time.
"At times I was paying £2,000 to £3,000 a month in charges," said Bob."At times I was paying £2,000 to £3,000 a month in charges," said Bob.
"I felt I was being ripped off - they were quite happy to take bank charges from us but were not willing to give us an overdraft.""I felt I was being ripped off - they were quite happy to take bank charges from us but were not willing to give us an overdraft."
Legal actionLegal action
Bob changed his bank account to HSBC in 2004, but late last year came across the idea of demanding the charges back while browsing the internet.Bob changed his bank account to HSBC in 2004, but late last year came across the idea of demanding the charges back while browsing the internet.
The banks' arguments are not credible, says the CAG's Marc Gander NatWest is owned by the Royal Bank of Scotland
Using standard letters from the website of the Consumer Action Group, he sent off a first demand in January this year for £24,000 plus £12,000 interest.Using standard letters from the website of the Consumer Action Group, he sent off a first demand in January this year for £24,000 plus £12,000 interest.
With no response he then started a legal action using the government's Money Claim Online service.With no response he then started a legal action using the government's Money Claim Online service.
A case conference had been scheduled for 11 May.A case conference had been scheduled for 11 May.
But out of the blue a cheque arrived last Friday, in full settlement of the claim.But out of the blue a cheque arrived last Friday, in full settlement of the claim.
Solicitor's letterSolicitor's letter
"Our client considers that your challenge to its charges would fail in court," said the letter from NatWest solicitors, Cobbett's of Manchester."Our client considers that your challenge to its charges would fail in court," said the letter from NatWest solicitors, Cobbett's of Manchester.
Without admission of liability our client is prepared to settle this matter in full to prevent incurring any further legal fees NatWest lawyersWithout admission of liability our client is prepared to settle this matter in full to prevent incurring any further legal fees NatWest lawyers
But after saying that the charges were fair, reasonable, transparent and levied in accordance with its agreement with Bob, the bank's solicitors threw in the towel.But after saying that the charges were fair, reasonable, transparent and levied in accordance with its agreement with Bob, the bank's solicitors threw in the towel.
"Our client does not believe that your claim has any prospect of succeeding," it said."Our client does not believe that your claim has any prospect of succeeding," it said.
"Although our client is confident that it will be successful at a final hearing, its legal fees will almost certainly outweigh the value of the claim."Although our client is confident that it will be successful at a final hearing, its legal fees will almost certainly outweigh the value of the claim.
"As such our client must take a commercial approach to such claims," it went on."As such our client must take a commercial approach to such claims," it went on.
Then came the towel.Then came the towel.
"Without admission of liability our client is prepared to settle this matter in full to prevent incurring any further legal fees.""Without admission of liability our client is prepared to settle this matter in full to prevent incurring any further legal fees."
All this drew a wry smile from Marc Gander of the CAG.All this drew a wry smile from Marc Gander of the CAG.
"The general message is that the banks are paying out substantial sums to avoid going to court," he said."The general message is that the banks are paying out substantial sums to avoid going to court," he said.
"This idea the banks are not finding it economically viable to contest the case is just not credible.""This idea the banks are not finding it economically viable to contest the case is just not credible."