This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/education-12227491

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
School curriculum 'slimmed down' Gove stresses 'facts' in school curriculum revamp
(about 3 hours later)
The number of compulsory subjects in England's national school curriculum is to be cut to four from September by Education Secretary Michael Gove. Education Secretary Michael Gove has said he wants more "facts" in England's national curriculum, as he launches a review of what children are taught.
All schools will have to teach English, maths, science and PE with experts to advise on what should be focused on. Mr Gove told the BBC there was currently too much focus on teaching methods and not enough on content.
The review may opt for fewer compulsory subjects, with ministers specifying only four that must be studied.
One union said teachers needed another curriculum review 'like a hole in the head'.
Under the review, launched on Thursday, a panel of experts will examine what is taught in England's schools.
Mr Gove has told them that English, maths, science and PE must remain compulsory for children of all ages.
The panel will then decide on whether other subjects should also be required study.
There are currently five compulsory subjects at primary level, 13 for pupils aged 11-14 and seven for 14-16 year-olds.
Mr Gove also wants to set out the "essential knowledge" children should have - including a "connected narrative" of British history.Mr Gove also wants to set out the "essential knowledge" children should have - including a "connected narrative" of British history.
Head teachers hope there will be "less prescription" in the new curriculum.
At the moment, the government in England sets out which subjects children have to learn at various stages and says what should be covered in them.
'Tragedy''Tragedy'
There are five subjects which are compulsory under the national curriculum for all age groups - English, ICT, mathematics, PE and science.
In the early years of secondary school, 13 subjects are statutory and this drops to seven for pupils aged between 14 to 16.
This last group is made up of: English, maths, citizenship, PE, ICT, science and Religious Education (schools have to teach RE but parents have the right to withdraw their children from the lessons).
The new government believes the current national curriculum is over-prescriptive, includes material that is not essential, and specifies teaching methods rather than content.The new government believes the current national curriculum is over-prescriptive, includes material that is not essential, and specifies teaching methods rather than content.
It says there should be more emphasis on what facts are taught, arguing that there should be a core knowledge that pupils should have to take their place as "educated members of society".It says there should be more emphasis on what facts are taught, arguing that there should be a core knowledge that pupils should have to take their place as "educated members of society".
The government will give more details about the shake-up of the curriculum later when Mr Gove visits a school in west London with members the expert panel, which includes head teachers. Speaking on the BBC Today programme, Mr Gove said it would be for the panel leading the review to determine what content should be specified in the new curriculum.
The panel is being asked to advise on what the key components of the compulsory subjects should be - and what should be taught under the other, non-compulsory subjects. "I'm not going to be coming up with any presciptive lists, I just think there should be facts," he said.
They might also advise on whether any other subjects should become compulsory. "One of the problems that we have at the moment is that in the history curriculum we only have two names [of historical figures], in the geography curriculum the only country we mention is the UK - we don't mention a single other country, continent, river or city - we do mention the EU, however."
The government will give more details about the shake-up of the curriculum later when Mr Gove visits a school in west London with members the panel, which includes head teachers.
At the Conservative Party Conference, Mr Gove said it was a "tragedy of our time" that children were growing up ignorant of the history of the United Kingdom.At the Conservative Party Conference, Mr Gove said it was a "tragedy of our time" that children were growing up ignorant of the history of the United Kingdom.
"Children are given a mix of topics at primary, a cursory run through Henry VIII and Hitler at secondary and many give up the subject at 14, without knowing how the vivid episodes of our past became a connected narrative," he said."Children are given a mix of topics at primary, a cursory run through Henry VIII and Hitler at secondary and many give up the subject at 14, without knowing how the vivid episodes of our past became a connected narrative," he said.
Mr Gove has already asked the historian Simon Schama to advise on how British history could be "put at the heart of a revised national curriculum".Mr Gove has already asked the historian Simon Schama to advise on how British history could be "put at the heart of a revised national curriculum".
He hopes top British authors and poets will contribute to the debate about which books and poetry should be studied.He hopes top British authors and poets will contribute to the debate about which books and poetry should be studied.
Public school curriculumPublic school curriculum
Mr Gove is expected to say: "The coalition will restore academic rigour to the curriculum to ensure that our pupils can compete with the world's best."Mr Gove is expected to say: "The coalition will restore academic rigour to the curriculum to ensure that our pupils can compete with the world's best."
The teaching union the NASUWT said teachers "want another curriculum review like a hole in the head".
"This is a pointless review when ministers have already determined that children should have a 1950s-style curriculum," said general secretary Chris Keates.
"Last week the coalition government dismissed a whole raft of current core subjects as unimportant. A review is unlikely to change this prejudiced and elitist view," she said.
Head teachers are keen to have less laid down in the national curriculum.Head teachers are keen to have less laid down in the national curriculum.
Russell Hobby, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers (which represents most primary school heads), said: "Heads are hoping for a significant reduction in the depth and breadth of prescription: a curriculum that covers the basics while leaving room for creativity, culture and excitement, enabling each school to design an offer that suits their children."Russell Hobby, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers (which represents most primary school heads), said: "Heads are hoping for a significant reduction in the depth and breadth of prescription: a curriculum that covers the basics while leaving room for creativity, culture and excitement, enabling each school to design an offer that suits their children."
Brian Lightman, the general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said it was important that the government looked at the whole curriculum in a "holistic way" and recognised that it was not just about the transfer of knowledge but about the skills and range of experiences children received in school.Brian Lightman, the general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said it was important that the government looked at the whole curriculum in a "holistic way" and recognised that it was not just about the transfer of knowledge but about the skills and range of experiences children received in school.
Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, said: "Ministers' desire to return to the public school curriculum they were taught over 25 years ago is not in the best interests of today's young people.Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, said: "Ministers' desire to return to the public school curriculum they were taught over 25 years ago is not in the best interests of today's young people.
"Teachers should be allowed to decide the specifics of what is taught, in partnership with employers and the local community, within a broad and balanced centrally agreed framework curriculum.""Teachers should be allowed to decide the specifics of what is taught, in partnership with employers and the local community, within a broad and balanced centrally agreed framework curriculum."