This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/uk-12476979

The article has changed 13 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 8 Version 9
Sex offender registration appeals to go ahead Sex offender registration appeals to go ahead
(40 minutes later)
Thousands of sex offenders in England and Wales are set to be given the right to appeal against having to register with the police for life.Thousands of sex offenders in England and Wales are set to be given the right to appeal against having to register with the police for life.
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said they had to follow a court ruling but public safety would not be weakened. Home Secretary Theresa May said there would be no automatic appeals and the bar would be set as "high as possible".
The Supreme Court found that not giving offenders the right of appeal was incompatible with their human rights. She said removing an offender from the list would be a police decision.
Under a review system, offenders would have to prove they no longer pose a risk to the public. The move comes after the Supreme Court ruled that not giving offenders the right of appeal was incompatible with their human rights.
Only individuals sentenced to more than 30 months for a sex-related crime are placed on the register for life. It was estimated that about 24,000 sex offenders, including paedophiles and rapists, who were required to register for life could be affected by the ruling. Only individuals sentenced to more than 30 months for a sex-related crime are placed on the register for life.
It was estimated that about 24,000 sex offenders, including paedophiles and rapists, who were required to register for life could be affected by the ruling.
Qualifying sex offenders are required to notify the police of their personal details, any change of address and when they travel abroad.Qualifying sex offenders are required to notify the police of their personal details, any change of address and when they travel abroad.
There is no centrally-held register of sex offenders but the Home Office says the system of notifying the police is commonly known as the sex offenders register.There is no centrally-held register of sex offenders but the Home Office says the system of notifying the police is commonly known as the sex offenders register.
Test casesTest cases
Last year, two convicted sex offenders used human rights laws to challenge the system and won the right to appeal against their life-time registration.Last year, two convicted sex offenders used human rights laws to challenge the system and won the right to appeal against their life-time registration.
The two offenders were a teenager convicted of rape and a 59-year-old man guilty of indecent assault.The two offenders were a teenager convicted of rape and a 59-year-old man guilty of indecent assault.
The ruling to allow sex offenders the right to have their names removed from the sex offenders register is one of those issues governments dread.The ruling to allow sex offenders the right to have their names removed from the sex offenders register is one of those issues governments dread.
It almost guarantees them sackloads of irate letters and coruscating tabloid headlines.It almost guarantees them sackloads of irate letters and coruscating tabloid headlines.
And yet the inevitable row might not be as painful as ministers fear.And yet the inevitable row might not be as painful as ministers fear.
Firstly, unlike the recent judgement on prisoners' votes, this was a decision made by Britain's Supreme Court, not the European Court of Human Rights.Firstly, unlike the recent judgement on prisoners' votes, this was a decision made by Britain's Supreme Court, not the European Court of Human Rights.
Secondly, it's not clear whether any change in the way the register is managed would require primary legislation, avoiding the possibility of a protracted Parliamentary tussle.Secondly, it's not clear whether any change in the way the register is managed would require primary legislation, avoiding the possibility of a protracted Parliamentary tussle.
And lastly the Scottish government has already implemented the change without suffering undue damage.And lastly the Scottish government has already implemented the change without suffering undue damage.
The teenage boy, known only as F, had been jailed for 30 months in October 2005, aged 11, for raping a six-year-old boy.The teenage boy, known only as F, had been jailed for 30 months in October 2005, aged 11, for raping a six-year-old boy.
The second case involved a man named Angus Aubrey Thompson who was jailed in 1996 for five years.The second case involved a man named Angus Aubrey Thompson who was jailed in 1996 for five years.
Both the offenders said their life-long registration with no chance of a review was a disproportionate interference in their family lives.Both the offenders said their life-long registration with no chance of a review was a disproportionate interference in their family lives.
In the case of F, he said he had been prevented from taking a family holiday abroad and from playing rugby league.In the case of F, he said he had been prevented from taking a family holiday abroad and from playing rugby league.
At the time, Lord Phillips, president of the Supreme Court, said: "It is obvious that there must be some circumstances in which an appropriate tribunal could reliably conclude that the risk of an individual carrying out a further sexual offence can be discounted to the extent that continuance of notification requirements is unjustified."
Mr Clegg said the government had to act on the ruling, which cannot be appealed.
"The last thing I want to see is people who have committed serious sexual offences disappear off the radar screen," he told London's LBC Radio.
"We have some of the toughest and best checks and controls on sex offenders anywhere in the world and we are not going to let our guard down."
The deputy prime minister added he would not predict how any new scheme would operate and details would be published in the next few months.
A Home Office spokeswoman said it was considering its response to the ruling.A Home Office spokeswoman said it was considering its response to the ruling.
"We are looking at the best way forward, working closely with the police and other public protection agencies, while preserving the very important safeguards we have in place," she said."We are looking at the best way forward, working closely with the police and other public protection agencies, while preserving the very important safeguards we have in place," she said.
'Potentially dangerous''Potentially dangerous'
The BBC's political correspondent Gary O'Donoghue said the ruling meant ministers were now "committed to introducing a review process".The BBC's political correspondent Gary O'Donoghue said the ruling meant ministers were now "committed to introducing a review process".
"They were due to bring proposals forward around now to amend the Sexual Offences Act 2003 but government sources have told the BBC an appeal system won't be introduced to Parliament until the spring," he said."They were due to bring proposals forward around now to amend the Sexual Offences Act 2003 but government sources have told the BBC an appeal system won't be introduced to Parliament until the spring," he said.
He added the move was likely to infuriate backbenchers on both sides of the Commons who last week registered their disapproval over plans to give prisoners the vote in elections following legal decisions based on human rights laws.He added the move was likely to infuriate backbenchers on both sides of the Commons who last week registered their disapproval over plans to give prisoners the vote in elections following legal decisions based on human rights laws.
Mark Williams-Thomas, a former police officer who worked in child protection, is concerned about the decision particularly in relation to child sex offenders.Mark Williams-Thomas, a former police officer who worked in child protection, is concerned about the decision particularly in relation to child sex offenders.
"These people are like leopards, they don't change their spots," he said."These people are like leopards, they don't change their spots," he said.
"These people are very devious. What we will end up with is potentially a very dangerous situation where someone has committed offences in the past and be able to say they haven't committed any new offences and therefore don't present a risk."These people are very devious. What we will end up with is potentially a very dangerous situation where someone has committed offences in the past and be able to say they haven't committed any new offences and therefore don't present a risk.
"But they are a risk in the same way as an alcoholic is always an alcoholic.""But they are a risk in the same way as an alcoholic is always an alcoholic."
Professor Peter Sommer from the London School of Economics, who has researched online child abuse cases, believes there will be very tight restrictions to limit the number of sex offenders who no longer have to register.Professor Peter Sommer from the London School of Economics, who has researched online child abuse cases, believes there will be very tight restrictions to limit the number of sex offenders who no longer have to register.
"I suspect the grounds are going to be, what was the original offence like, how did you conduct yourself at trial, how did you behave in prison, did you go in for rehabilitation, what does a psychiatrist say about your condition now and did you comply with everything the police asked to you do?" he said."I suspect the grounds are going to be, what was the original offence like, how did you conduct yourself at trial, how did you behave in prison, did you go in for rehabilitation, what does a psychiatrist say about your condition now and did you comply with everything the police asked to you do?" he said.
The Scottish government has already amended its laws to allow convicted adults to seek a review after 15 years on the sex offenders register.The Scottish government has already amended its laws to allow convicted adults to seek a review after 15 years on the sex offenders register.
Also those placed on the register when under 18 years old can appeal after eight years.Also those placed on the register when under 18 years old can appeal after eight years.