This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/health-12481427

The article has changed 14 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Body Mass Index - BMI - 'misses obesity risks' Body Mass Index - BMI - 'misses obesity risks'
(about 1 hour later)
VIEWPOINT By Dr Margaret Ashwell Visiting Fellow, Oxford Brookes University Ashwell OBEVIEWPOINT By Dr Margaret Ashwell Visiting Fellow, Oxford Brookes University Ashwell OBE
In this week's 'Scrubbing Up', nutrition expert Dr Margaret Ashwell OBE argues that using BMI alone could be missing some patients at risk of the diseases associated with obesity.In this week's 'Scrubbing Up', nutrition expert Dr Margaret Ashwell OBE argues that using BMI alone could be missing some patients at risk of the diseases associated with obesity.
BMI is calculated by dividing someone's weight in kilograms by the square of their height in metres.BMI is calculated by dividing someone's weight in kilograms by the square of their height in metres.
But because BMI is based on weight, people who are unusually muscular can have BMI values which would make them overweight or obese. Examples might include professional rowers and boxers.But because BMI is based on weight, people who are unusually muscular can have BMI values which would make them overweight or obese. Examples might include professional rowers and boxers.
Different types of fatDifferent types of fat
There's a second, even more important, problem. BMI is a good proxy for total body fat, but it cannot distinguish between different types of fat distribution.There's a second, even more important, problem. BMI is a good proxy for total body fat, but it cannot distinguish between different types of fat distribution.
Excess fat that is found deep down in the region of the stomach gives someone a large waist circumference and an 'apple' shape. This is often associated with risk factors for serious conditions such as heart disease, raised blood pressure and diabetes.Excess fat that is found deep down in the region of the stomach gives someone a large waist circumference and an 'apple' shape. This is often associated with risk factors for serious conditions such as heart disease, raised blood pressure and diabetes.
Excess fat that is found under the skin, around the bottom, hips and thighs is usually accompanied by a smaller waist circumference and a 'pear' shape. This is generally accepted to be less harmful to health.Excess fat that is found under the skin, around the bottom, hips and thighs is usually accompanied by a smaller waist circumference and a 'pear' shape. This is generally accepted to be less harmful to health.
So a measurement that can distinguish between 'apples' and 'pears' would be a more effective way of screening for these diseases.So a measurement that can distinguish between 'apples' and 'pears' would be a more effective way of screening for these diseases.
I have argued since 1996 that we should assess risk based on waist-to-height ratio (WHtR); saying that "Your waist circumference should not be more than half your height (WHtR 0.5)".I have argued since 1996 that we should assess risk based on waist-to-height ratio (WHtR); saying that "Your waist circumference should not be more than half your height (WHtR 0.5)".
This is the point at which some action to decrease your waistline should be considered.This is the point at which some action to decrease your waistline should be considered.
My colleagues and I recently published a review of 78 studies in 14 different countries, including Caucasian, Asian and Central American subjects, which has confirmed that WHtR is a better predictor of cardiometabolic risk than BMI and that WHtR 0.5 is a suitable boundary value.My colleagues and I recently published a review of 78 studies in 14 different countries, including Caucasian, Asian and Central American subjects, which has confirmed that WHtR is a better predictor of cardiometabolic risk than BMI and that WHtR 0.5 is a suitable boundary value.
Simple risk assessmentSimple risk assessment
The WHtR measurement offers the exciting possibility that it could be used to assess risk for adults in several ethnic groups. This is because the BMI boundary values were derived from Caucasian populations.The WHtR measurement offers the exciting possibility that it could be used to assess risk for adults in several ethnic groups. This is because the BMI boundary values were derived from Caucasian populations.
They might not be appropriate for Asians, who tend to carry more fat centrally so their risk seems to increase at a BMI lower than 25 (between 20 and 25 is considered a healthy BMI).They might not be appropriate for Asians, who tend to carry more fat centrally so their risk seems to increase at a BMI lower than 25 (between 20 and 25 is considered a healthy BMI).
WHtR might also be a simple way to assess health risk in children.WHtR might also be a simple way to assess health risk in children.
And of course waist circumference and height can be measured with a simple tape measure in any units: inches, centimetres etc, unlike the BMI which requires weighing scales and must be expressed in metric units.And of course waist circumference and height can be measured with a simple tape measure in any units: inches, centimetres etc, unlike the BMI which requires weighing scales and must be expressed in metric units.
The public health message is simple - "keep your waist circumference to less than half your height".The public health message is simple - "keep your waist circumference to less than half your height".
Missing the risksMissing the risks
So what would be the difference in screening for central obesity using WHtR, instead of screening for total obesity using BMI?So what would be the difference in screening for central obesity using WHtR, instead of screening for total obesity using BMI?
In 2009 we published a paper in which we applied the WHtR boundary value of 0.5 to nearly 2,000 British adults in the nationally representative National Diet and Nutrition Survey.In 2009 we published a paper in which we applied the WHtR boundary value of 0.5 to nearly 2,000 British adults in the nationally representative National Diet and Nutrition Survey.
We found that one in three 'non-overweight' men (judged by a BMI of 25 or less) and more than one in seven 'non-overweight' women had a WHtR value greater than 0.5.We found that one in three 'non-overweight' men (judged by a BMI of 25 or less) and more than one in seven 'non-overweight' women had a WHtR value greater than 0.5.
So these people may, unknowingly, be at increased risk of serious conditions such as heart disease and diabetes, due to their central obesity.So these people may, unknowingly, be at increased risk of serious conditions such as heart disease and diabetes, due to their central obesity.
These are the 'non-overweight apples'.These are the 'non-overweight apples'.
On the other hand, one in six women and one in twenty men who were told they were overweight by BMI assessment, would actually have relatively low cardiometabolic risk because their WHtR is 0.5 or less.On the other hand, one in six women and one in twenty men who were told they were overweight by BMI assessment, would actually have relatively low cardiometabolic risk because their WHtR is 0.5 or less.
These are the 'overweight pears'.These are the 'overweight pears'.
Most interesting of all, the 'non-overweight apples' had significantly higher levels of cardiometabolic risk factors (blood pressure and non-HDL cholesterol) than the 'overweight' pears'.Most interesting of all, the 'non-overweight apples' had significantly higher levels of cardiometabolic risk factors (blood pressure and non-HDL cholesterol) than the 'overweight' pears'.
It is a real worry that using BMI alone for screening could miss people who are at risk from central obesity and might also be alarming those whose risk is not as great as it appears from their BMI.It is a real worry that using BMI alone for screening could miss people who are at risk from central obesity and might also be alarming those whose risk is not as great as it appears from their BMI.


Comments



Comments

You are not currently signed in. or register.You are not currently signed in. or register.
 
  • id="comment_106740002">
 
  • id="comment_106743706">
@reggiedixon, in fact obesity remains as hotly debated as climate science, however the media (as always) insist on only reporting the side of it which supports their fat panic narrative. Articles like those linked below, published in respectable journals, suggest that the science is far from 'settled'. http://www.nutritionj.com/content/10/1/9http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/1/55.full
Report this comment
Link to this
    • I always joke (by paraphrasing Twain) that there are lies, damn lies, and BMI's. I tend to put on muscle easily, so even as skinny, tall college student I was already "obese" on the BMI scale. The problem is the way that BMI's are measured by a simple height/mass calculation. If BMI used an actual body volume measurement (such as displacement), then it would be accurate and useful.I always joke (by paraphrasing Twain) that there are lies, damn lies, and BMI's. I tend to put on muscle easily, so even as skinny, tall college student I was already "obese" on the BMI scale. The problem is the way that BMI's are measured by a simple height/mass calculation. If BMI used an actual body volume measurement (such as displacement), then it would be accurate and useful.
    Report this comment Report this comment
    Link to thisLink to this
    		•
    • @151179 : The idea that it is possible to be healthy and obese has been debunked many times, most recently in the last few weeks. If someone has a BMI over 30 and is not a power athlete/bodybuilder they are going to develop health issues as a result. In fact the health outcomes are no better in the heavily muscled individuals either. Just because we don't like something does not make it false.@151179 : The idea that it is possible to be healthy and obese has been debunked many times, most recently in the last few weeks. If someone has a BMI over 30 and is not a power athlete/bodybuilder they are going to develop health issues as a result. In fact the health outcomes are no better in the heavily muscled individuals either. Just because we don't like something does not make it false.
    Report this comment Report this comment
    Link to thisLink to this
    		•
    • The BMI was devised 200 years ago by a Dutch eugenicist, and was never intended as a measure of individual health. Nonetheless its arbitrary thresholds are now being misused to label people 'unacceptable'. Society's utter fixation with visible fat has thus far generated only counterproductive stigma; maybe it's time to move beyond the weight-centred paradigm to 'Health At Every Size' (Google it).The BMI was devised 200 years ago by a Dutch eugenicist, and was never intended as a measure of individual health. Nonetheless its arbitrary thresholds are now being misused to label people 'unacceptable'. Society's utter fixation with visible fat has thus far generated only counterproductive stigma; maybe it's time to move beyond the weight-centred paradigm to 'Health At Every Size' (Google it).
    Report this comment Report this comment
    Link to thisLink to this
    		•
    • Huzzah! At last someone speaking out about the flawed measurement that is BMI - yet another example of the lazy non-science that clogs 'health promotion' to such an extent that the good stuff gets ignored because so much rubbish is peddled as 'fact' without evidentiary back up. And this time the better measurement is easier to perform. Win!Huzzah! At last someone speaking out about the flawed measurement that is BMI - yet another example of the lazy non-science that clogs 'health promotion' to such an extent that the good stuff gets ignored because so much rubbish is peddled as 'fact' without evidentiary back up. And this time the better measurement is easier to perform. Win!
    Report this comment Report this comment
    Link to thisLink to this
  • class="dna-comment" id="comment_106728943"> class="comments_user_info secondary_body"> 1. reggiedixon
    		•  
    As with all criticisms of BMI, this tends to miss the fact that BMI was intended to be an easy to calculate rule of thumb, it also vastly overstates the idea that some people are very muscular. Yes some people are very muscular - which you can spot by looking at them. All this equivocation about BMI does is convince many overweight people that they are actually one of those "BMI doesn't work for" Comments 5 of 6
    href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/newscommentsmodule/comments/UserComplaintPage?PostID=106728943&s_start=1" class="popup dna-commentbox-complain-link" title="Complain about this comment"> Report this comment  
    Link to this
       
    Add your commentAdd your comment
    You are not currently signed in. or register.You are not currently signed in. or register.