This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/magazine-12607537

The article has changed 34 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 17 Version 18
Who, What, Why: Why does the UK give aid to India? Who, What, Why: Why does the UK give aid to India?
(40 minutes later)
The government is expected to freeze the level of assistance given to India at £295m ($480m) a year. But why does a nuclear power with its own space programme need British aid?The government is expected to freeze the level of assistance given to India at £295m ($480m) a year. But why does a nuclear power with its own space programme need British aid?
In a widely-signalled move, it is anticipated that International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell will announce the amount of aid given to India will be maintained at 2009/10 levels.In a widely-signalled move, it is anticipated that International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell will announce the amount of aid given to India will be maintained at 2009/10 levels.
But the decision has attracted criticism from newspapers and politicians who say the UK taxpayer does not need to donate to a state that is itself a foreign aid donor, which is classified by the World Bank as a middle income country (MIC) and whose economy is growing at nearly 10% a year.But the decision has attracted criticism from newspapers and politicians who say the UK taxpayer does not need to donate to a state that is itself a foreign aid donor, which is classified by the World Bank as a middle income country (MIC) and whose economy is growing at nearly 10% a year.
However, advocates of aid say a third of the planet's population who are below the World Bank's extreme poverty line live in India. They also argue half of all children in the country are malnourished and it does not have the tax base to eliminate poverty though internal wealth redistribution.However, advocates of aid say a third of the planet's population who are below the World Bank's extreme poverty line live in India. They also argue half of all children in the country are malnourished and it does not have the tax base to eliminate poverty though internal wealth redistribution.
Andy Sumner of the Institute of Development Studies says: "If UK aid was reduced, there is no guarantee that the funding to the poorest states where most of India's chronically poor live would be topped up by the Indian government."Andy Sumner of the Institute of Development Studies says: "If UK aid was reduced, there is no guarantee that the funding to the poorest states where most of India's chronically poor live would be topped up by the Indian government."
Although the Department for International Development's budget has been unaffected by the government's spending cuts programme, the UK is expected to stop direct aid to 16 countries, including Russia, China, Vietnam, Serbia and Iraq.Although the Department for International Development's budget has been unaffected by the government's spending cuts programme, the UK is expected to stop direct aid to 16 countries, including Russia, China, Vietnam, Serbia and Iraq.
The decision to exclude India from this list has provoked attacks from those sceptical about whether this increasingly important economic power is really a worthy recipient of development cash.The decision to exclude India from this list has provoked attacks from those sceptical about whether this increasingly important economic power is really a worthy recipient of development cash.
Indeed, there is little doubt the nation is experiencing a boom. Its economy is expected to grow by 9% in 2012, social spending funds are also set to increase by 17% and in 2009 it was upgraded by the World Bank from "poor" to an MIC.Indeed, there is little doubt the nation is experiencing a boom. Its economy is expected to grow by 9% in 2012, social spending funds are also set to increase by 17% and in 2009 it was upgraded by the World Bank from "poor" to an MIC.
The Indian military has conducted nuclear tests, the country operates its own space programme and, according to Forbes magazine, it has more billionaires than the UK.The Indian military has conducted nuclear tests, the country operates its own space programme and, according to Forbes magazine, it has more billionaires than the UK.
Moreover, India is itself a foreign aid donor, providing more than £300m ($500m) to poorer countries in 2008.Moreover, India is itself a foreign aid donor, providing more than £300m ($500m) to poorer countries in 2008.
Conservative MP Philip Davies argues the decision to continue funding the country is indefensible at a time when the British taxpayers are experiencing a spending squeeze of their own.Conservative MP Philip Davies argues the decision to continue funding the country is indefensible at a time when the British taxpayers are experiencing a spending squeeze of their own.
Massive inequalitiesMassive inequalities
"India spends £36bn a year on defence and £750m a year on its space programme," he says. "What's more, India is one of the fastest-growing economies in the world. It's completely unjustifiable, especially at this time.""India spends £36bn a year on defence and £750m a year on its space programme," he says. "What's more, India is one of the fastest-growing economies in the world. It's completely unjustifiable, especially at this time."
However, supporters of the continued aid insist this argument ignores India's massive inequalities.However, supporters of the continued aid insist this argument ignores India's massive inequalities.
Its middle-income status, they say, is irrelevant, given that 72% of world's poorest people - defined by the World Bank as those earning less than $1.25 (77p) a day - live in MICs.Its middle-income status, they say, is irrelevant, given that 72% of world's poorest people - defined by the World Bank as those earning less than $1.25 (77p) a day - live in MICs.
Indeed, India has more people in poverty than the whole of sub-Saharan Africa. Its per capita gross national income in 2009 was £725 ($1,180) compared with £25,509 ($41,520) in the UK.Indeed, India has more people in poverty than the whole of sub-Saharan Africa. Its per capita gross national income in 2009 was £725 ($1,180) compared with £25,509 ($41,520) in the UK.
Additionally, the sheer number of people in poverty in India means that it is crucial to achieving the UK's international poverty reduction targets, ministers say.Additionally, the sheer number of people in poverty in India means that it is crucial to achieving the UK's international poverty reduction targets, ministers say.
Mr Mitchell told the BBC's Politics Show that if the government were to meet its eight Millennium development goals - including eradicating extreme hunger and reduce child mortality - it would have to "operate where poverty is greatest".Mr Mitchell told the BBC's Politics Show that if the government were to meet its eight Millennium development goals - including eradicating extreme hunger and reduce child mortality - it would have to "operate where poverty is greatest".
Moreover, although the country may have a small super-rich elite and a growing middle class, its capacity for wealth redistribution remains limited according to a 2009 World Bank report. It found that even a 100% marginal tax rate on Indian earnings would only plug 20% of its aggregate poverty gap.Moreover, although the country may have a small super-rich elite and a growing middle class, its capacity for wealth redistribution remains limited according to a 2009 World Bank report. It found that even a 100% marginal tax rate on Indian earnings would only plug 20% of its aggregate poverty gap.
"The case for continued UK aid to India is about a third of all the world's poor who live there," says Dr Sumner. "These 450 million poor people are often lower caste and very marginalised.""The case for continued UK aid to India is about a third of all the world's poor who live there," says Dr Sumner. "These 450 million poor people are often lower caste and very marginalised."
The debate is sure to continue. But given that the Indian government has debated whether it wants to continue receiving UK aid, the final word on the matter may not come from British shores.The debate is sure to continue. But given that the Indian government has debated whether it wants to continue receiving UK aid, the final word on the matter may not come from British shores.


Comments



Comments

You are not currently signed in. or register.You are not currently signed in. or register.
 
 
I think it is right to ask the Indian Governmnet how they justify aid from the UK given their economic growth and our appalling debts at present. Seems odd that we give aid which in turn seems to be "redistributed" by the Indian Government through their own aid programme?I think it is right to ask the Indian Governmnet how they justify aid from the UK given their economic growth and our appalling debts at present. Seems odd that we give aid which in turn seems to be "redistributed" by the Indian Government through their own aid programme?
Report this comment Report this comment
Link to thisLink to this
    		•
    • The amount of aid should be reduced over time as the Indian economy grows and India should do something to address the the massive wealth divide between the rich and the poor. From the article it is shown that they could offer support to those impoverished citizens if they didn't waste so much money on things which don't really help the people of their country.The amount of aid should be reduced over time as the Indian economy grows and India should do something to address the the massive wealth divide between the rich and the poor. From the article it is shown that they could offer support to those impoverished citizens if they didn't waste so much money on things which don't really help the people of their country.
    Report this comment Report this comment
    Link to thisLink to this
    		•
    • If you want to eradicate poverty, then it's up to countries to distribute their wealth more evenly. That applies to this (or any) country just as much as it does to India. There should be no need for aid: every country has wealth, it's just that a few people at the top tend to greedily hang on to it all.If you want to eradicate poverty, then it's up to countries to distribute their wealth more evenly. That applies to this (or any) country just as much as it does to India. There should be no need for aid: every country has wealth, it's just that a few people at the top tend to greedily hang on to it all.
    Report this comment Report this comment
    Link to thisLink to this
    		•
    • This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.This comment was removed because the moderators found it broke the House Rules.
    Report this comment Report this comment
    Link to thisLink to this
    		•
    • It's very easy to say that India should cut its space and defence programmes, but then were would India's engineers and scientists work? They'd have to leave the country and find work elsewhere resulting in a brain-drain, leading to more poverty. And you'd all be complaining about the Indian engineers taking our jobs.It's very easy to say that India should cut its space and defence programmes, but then were would India's engineers and scientists work? They'd have to leave the country and find work elsewhere resulting in a brain-drain, leading to more poverty. And you'd all be complaining about the Indian engineers taking our jobs.
    Report this comment Report this comment
    Link to thisLink to this
       
    Comments 5 of 11Comments 5 of 11
       
    Add your commentAdd your comment
    You are not currently signed in. or register.You are not currently signed in. or register.