This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/magazine-12746129

The article has changed 23 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 8 Version 9
The fear of nuclear The fear of nuclear
(40 minutes later)
By Jon Kelly BBC News MagazineBy Jon Kelly BBC News Magazine
Explosions at the Japanese plant hit by earthquake and tsunami have sparked new fears that will feed into debates about nuclear power across the globe. But what is the ordinary person's understanding of the risks underlying nuclear power?Explosions at the Japanese plant hit by earthquake and tsunami have sparked new fears that will feed into debates about nuclear power across the globe. But what is the ordinary person's understanding of the risks underlying nuclear power?
It was a shocking, gut-lurching sight - and one that spoke directly to the darker reaches of our collective imagination.It was a shocking, gut-lurching sight - and one that spoke directly to the darker reaches of our collective imagination.
As images of plumes of smoke billowing from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan were relayed around the planet, a familiar set of fears took hold, driven by memories of atomic accidents at Windscale, Three Mile Island and Chernobyl.As images of plumes of smoke billowing from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan were relayed around the planet, a familiar set of fears took hold, driven by memories of atomic accidents at Windscale, Three Mile Island and Chernobyl.
Even for those not old enough to recall nuclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Cuban missile crisis of 1962 or the nuclear stalemate between east and west that persisted until the collapse of the Soviet Union, fear of radiation carries unique emotional force.Even for those not old enough to recall nuclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Cuban missile crisis of 1962 or the nuclear stalemate between east and west that persisted until the collapse of the Soviet Union, fear of radiation carries unique emotional force.
But to advocates of nuclear power, the fact that meltdown has so far been averted in the face of such an extreme natural disaster is proof of how robust and resilient a plant can be.But to advocates of nuclear power, the fact that meltdown has so far been averted in the face of such an extreme natural disaster is proof of how robust and resilient a plant can be.
To sceptics, the Fukushima incident is an illustration that no amount of planning can foresee every mishap that might befall an atomic plant, meaning such potentially devastating technology can never be guaranteed safe.To sceptics, the Fukushima incident is an illustration that no amount of planning can foresee every mishap that might befall an atomic plant, meaning such potentially devastating technology can never be guaranteed safe.
Unease is already feeding into the policy debate around the world.Unease is already feeding into the policy debate around the world.
The Swiss government has reacted to the Japanese disaster by suspending plans to build and replace nuclear plants.The Swiss government has reacted to the Japanese disaster by suspending plans to build and replace nuclear plants.
Likewise, long-term German anti-nuclear activists will regard it as grist to their mill, and the issue looks certain to dominate the country's forthcoming regional elections.Likewise, long-term German anti-nuclear activists will regard it as grist to their mill, and the issue looks certain to dominate the country's forthcoming regional elections.
It is hard to imagine it not dominating public meetings on the issue in the UK.It is hard to imagine it not dominating public meetings on the issue in the UK.
Existing nuclear power stations, which provide 20% of UK electricity, are scheduled to close over the next 20 years or so.Existing nuclear power stations, which provide 20% of UK electricity, are scheduled to close over the next 20 years or so.
In October 2010, the UK government identified eight potential sites in England and Wales for new nuclear power stations by 2025: Bradwell in Essex, Hartlepool, Heysham in Lancashire, Hinkley Point in Somerset, Oldbury in Gloucestershire, Sellafield in Cumbria, Sizewell in Suffolk and Wylfa on the Isle of Anglesey.In October 2010, the UK government identified eight potential sites in England and Wales for new nuclear power stations by 2025: Bradwell in Essex, Hartlepool, Heysham in Lancashire, Hinkley Point in Somerset, Oldbury in Gloucestershire, Sellafield in Cumbria, Sizewell in Suffolk and Wylfa on the Isle of Anglesey.
One of those who predicts more scepticism is Malcolm Grimston, associate fellow at Chatham House's energy, environment and development programme, himself a supporter of nuclear power as a means of reducing carbon emissions.One of those who predicts more scepticism is Malcolm Grimston, associate fellow at Chatham House's energy, environment and development programme, himself a supporter of nuclear power as a means of reducing carbon emissions.
He insists that what is most remarkable about Fukushima is how effective procedures were in preventing a meltdown, and says the new generation of power stations planned for the UK would be even safer.He insists that what is most remarkable about Fukushima is how effective procedures were in preventing a meltdown, and says the new generation of power stations planned for the UK would be even safer.
But he worries the tsunami will mean that, in the short term at least, the debate will be driven by popular anxieties rather than facts.But he worries the tsunami will mean that, in the short term at least, the debate will be driven by popular anxieties rather than facts.
"Nuclear energy is bound up with our creation myths about man in the garden of Eden, dabbling in forbidden knowledge," he says."Nuclear energy is bound up with our creation myths about man in the garden of Eden, dabbling in forbidden knowledge," he says.
"There is this cultural fear of radioactivity. But public opinion recovered after Chernobyl and Three Mile Island."There is this cultural fear of radioactivity. But public opinion recovered after Chernobyl and Three Mile Island.
"And what's different today with the nuclear debate is the recognition that the availability of fossil fuels is an issue.""And what's different today with the nuclear debate is the recognition that the availability of fossil fuels is an issue."
However, Tony Juniper, a writer, environmental activist and former director of Friends of the Earth, insists that people's fears about nuclear power are entirely rational - Fukushima being a prime example of why this is the case.However, Tony Juniper, a writer, environmental activist and former director of Friends of the Earth, insists that people's fears about nuclear power are entirely rational - Fukushima being a prime example of why this is the case.
He rejects the notion that nuclear energy is the best way to reduce carbon emissions, insisting that renewables are cheaper and less hazardous.He rejects the notion that nuclear energy is the best way to reduce carbon emissions, insisting that renewables are cheaper and less hazardous.
And he also argues that it is quite reasonable to conclude that nuclear power can never be a risk worth taking.And he also argues that it is quite reasonable to conclude that nuclear power can never be a risk worth taking.
When the risk of a plant is calculated - or communicated to the public - the emphasis would be on predicting the dangers via computer modelling and establishing duplicated safety systems or "redundancies".When the risk of a plant is calculated - or communicated to the public - the emphasis would be on predicting the dangers via computer modelling and establishing duplicated safety systems or "redundancies".
In the UK, Switzerland and Germany nuclear proponents can point to the absence of major earthquakes and tsunamis.In the UK, Switzerland and Germany nuclear proponents can point to the absence of major earthquakes and tsunamis.
Local papers in California like the San Francisco Chronicle have already pointed out there are two nuclear plants near fault lines, but it has also been argued in the Los Angeles Times that the chances of a Japan-level incident are small.Local papers in California like the San Francisco Chronicle have already pointed out there are two nuclear plants near fault lines, but it has also been argued in the Los Angeles Times that the chances of a Japan-level incident are small.
And even in countries free of major earthquakes, like the UK, the debate on new plants will still be affected by people concerned more generally about how risks are calculated.And even in countries free of major earthquakes, like the UK, the debate on new plants will still be affected by people concerned more generally about how risks are calculated.
A widely-circulated blog posting has noted that the Fukushima plant was designed only to withstand an 8.2 magnitude earthquake, but has so far avoided a meltdown despite an earthquake several times larger and a tsunami.A widely-circulated blog posting has noted that the Fukushima plant was designed only to withstand an 8.2 magnitude earthquake, but has so far avoided a meltdown despite an earthquake several times larger and a tsunami.
For Juniper, the fear itself remains.For Juniper, the fear itself remains.
"It's far too early to say what's going to happen in Japan," Juniper says. "But undoubtedly, this will re-invigorate the debate around nuclear energy in this country."It's far too early to say what's going to happen in Japan," Juniper says. "But undoubtedly, this will re-invigorate the debate around nuclear energy in this country.
"The very fact that we have this huge news story reminds everybody that nuclear power involves having to contain these high levels of radiation."The very fact that we have this huge news story reminds everybody that nuclear power involves having to contain these high levels of radiation.
"The idea that even the most modern of reactors is 100% safe is not something that can really be sustained.""The idea that even the most modern of reactors is 100% safe is not something that can really be sustained."
Indeed, Prof Gary Davies, an expert in reputation management at Manchester Business School, says the UK nuclear lobby will be worrying about the long-term impact on popular perceptions.Indeed, Prof Gary Davies, an expert in reputation management at Manchester Business School, says the UK nuclear lobby will be worrying about the long-term impact on popular perceptions.
Much of the public already accords it a kind of "original sin", he says, based on mistrust of the industry.Much of the public already accords it a kind of "original sin", he says, based on mistrust of the industry.
"Every reputation issue has both rational and emotional aspects," he says."Every reputation issue has both rational and emotional aspects," he says.
"In a crisis the emotional takes hold and no matter how logical and compelling the rational arguments are, the emotional wins out.""In a crisis the emotional takes hold and no matter how logical and compelling the rational arguments are, the emotional wins out."
Japanese scientists might be working frantically to contain the spread of radiation. But already the impact of the Fukushima blasts are being felt on the other side of the world.Japanese scientists might be working frantically to contain the spread of radiation. But already the impact of the Fukushima blasts are being felt on the other side of the world.


Comments



Comments

You are not currently signed in. or register.You are not currently signed in. or register.
 
 
Far from being a fervent supporter of nuclear power, there are some very hard facts. Looking at energy industry casualties from 1969 to 2000 (the only ones I could find), nuclear energy is by far the safest. Same goes for e.g. Chernobyl statistics of long-term cumulative effects relative to other pollution, and close to 290,000 people die globally due to fossile fuel burning power plants.Far from being a fervent supporter of nuclear power, there are some very hard facts. Looking at energy industry casualties from 1969 to 2000 (the only ones I could find), nuclear energy is by far the safest. Same goes for e.g. Chernobyl statistics of long-term cumulative effects relative to other pollution, and close to 290,000 people die globally due to fossile fuel burning power plants.
Report this comment Report this comment
Link to thisLink to this
    		•
    • "Some risks" means that an accident WILL happen one day. Some simple error or force majore will trigger a catastrophy. Mathematics can prove that the chances of that happening is small, but it WILL happen, then what? The wind and seas WILL spread the radiation. Don't kid yourself that this will not happen, it's only a matter of time, maybe not in our generation but surely in a future generations."Some risks" means that an accident WILL happen one day. Some simple error or force majore will trigger a catastrophy. Mathematics can prove that the chances of that happening is small, but it WILL happen, then what? The wind and seas WILL spread the radiation. Don't kid yourself that this will not happen, it's only a matter of time, maybe not in our generation but surely in a future generations.
    Report this comment Report this comment
    Link to thisLink to this
    		•
    • Furthermore to my last comment, the fact that this power plant withstood a M9.0 earthquake and then a 25ft tsunami head-on and suffered very little damage is a testament to the safety of nuclear power - especially in Europe where earthquakes/tsunamis are not a worry.No fears about burning oil refineries spewing carcinogenic soot into the air - can't measure that with a Geiger counter, mind youFurthermore to my last comment, the fact that this power plant withstood a M9.0 earthquake and then a 25ft tsunami head-on and suffered very little damage is a testament to the safety of nuclear power - especially in Europe where earthquakes/tsunamis are not a worry.No fears about burning oil refineries spewing carcinogenic soot into the air - can't measure that with a Geiger counter, mind you
    Report this comment Report this comment
    Link to thisLink to this
    		•
    • An exponential half-life still takes forever to go to zero.There are earthquakes in the UK too.Wind turbines can use pumped storage when the wind doesn't blow, and are much lower cost in the long term and when produced and deployed in mass. The "fuel" is free.Nuclear fission is not sustainable, is very expensive, and we have to import the fuel.Nuclear fusion is STILL not viable.An exponential half-life still takes forever to go to zero.There are earthquakes in the UK too.Wind turbines can use pumped storage when the wind doesn't blow, and are much lower cost in the long term and when produced and deployed in mass. The "fuel" is free.Nuclear fission is not sustainable, is very expensive, and we have to import the fuel.Nuclear fusion is STILL not viable.
    Report this comment Report this comment
    Link to thisLink to this
    		•
    • I fully expect this disaster to increase anti-nuclear power opinions around the world.However, far more people have died or been injured during fossil fuel power production than have ever been injured or killed in nuclear power related accidents. Just two examples are coal mining and more recently the gulf oil spill.The word nuclear has very negative conetations among the general public.I fully expect this disaster to increase anti-nuclear power opinions around the world.However, far more people have died or been injured during fossil fuel power production than have ever been injured or killed in nuclear power related accidents. Just two examples are coal mining and more recently the gulf oil spill.The word nuclear has very negative conetations among the general public.
    Report this comment Report this comment
    Link to thisLink to this
       
    Comments 5 of 9Comments 5 of 9
       
    Add your commentAdd your comment
    You are not currently signed in. or register.You are not currently signed in. or register.