This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/sci/tech/6645161.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Aboriginal remains fight resolved Aboriginal remains fight resolved
(1 day later)
London's Natural History Museum has struck a deal with Australian aboriginal leaders over the remains of 17 indigenous Tasmanians it holds.London's Natural History Museum has struck a deal with Australian aboriginal leaders over the remains of 17 indigenous Tasmanians it holds.
The museum had agreed to return the remains to Tasmania, but not until tests were carried out on the bones.The museum had agreed to return the remains to Tasmania, but not until tests were carried out on the bones.
But Tasmanian aborigines viewed the tests as a desecration of their beliefs and took their case to the High Court.But Tasmanian aborigines viewed the tests as a desecration of their beliefs and took their case to the High Court.
Under the settlement, four DNA samples from the 19th century remains will be preserved in Tasmania. Under the settlement, four DNA samples from the 19th Century specimens will be preserved in Tasmania.
The remains - including teeth, skulls and other bones removed from the island - will be turned over to a delegation from the Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre (TAC) in a private ceremony at the museum on Friday.The remains - including teeth, skulls and other bones removed from the island - will be turned over to a delegation from the Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre (TAC) in a private ceremony at the museum on Friday.
The agreement means that scientists are not able to complete all the tests they had originally planned. But a Natural History Museum (NHM) spokesperson said the investigations were "conducted to a high level".The agreement means that scientists are not able to complete all the tests they had originally planned. But a Natural History Museum (NHM) spokesperson said the investigations were "conducted to a high level".
She said museum researchers had extracted as much information as they could under limits on testing imposed in the High Court.She said museum researchers had extracted as much information as they could under limits on testing imposed in the High Court.
Remains repatriatedRemains repatriated
"The decision by the museum's trustees in November last year represented a willingness to move on from past practices," said Richard Lane, the NHM director of science."The decision by the museum's trustees in November last year represented a willingness to move on from past practices," said Richard Lane, the NHM director of science.
"We're very pleased that we've been able to persuade them to preserve the DNA. We're actually quite enthusiastic that we've come to a constructive agreement. Both parties have travelled a long way." "We're very pleased that we've been able to persuade them to preserve the DNA. We're actually quite enthusiastic that we've come to a constructive agreement. Both parties have travelled a long way," he told BBC news.
Although the museum agreed to return the remains last year, it had maintained the right to continue testing them - taking casts and photographs and subjecting the remains to CT scans and measurements. Although the museum agreed to return the remains last year, it had maintained the right to continue testing them - taking casts and photographs and subjecting the specimens to CT scans and measurements.
But TAC contested this part of the decision and initiated legal proceedings. In February 2007, an injunction was issued preventing the museum from studying the remains. This was subsequently lifted after the museum said it would limit its tests. But TAC contested this part of the decision and initiated legal proceedings. In February 2007, an injunction was issued preventing the museum from studying the remains any further. This was subsequently lifted after the museum said it would limit its tests.
Researchers would no longer be able to use "invasive" techniques such as DNA extraction or isotope analysis. These might have yielded insight into the Aborigines' genetic make-up, their diet and aspects of their culture. Researchers would no longer use "invasive" techniques such as DNA extraction or isotope analysis, the museum agreed. These procedures might have yielded insight into the Aborigines' genetic make-up, their diet and aspects of their culture.
Under the agreement now reached, DNA samples from four of the remains will be preserved in Tasmania under the joint control of the NHM and the TAC. These samples were extracted from the remains before the decision taken to return them. Under the agreement now reached, DNA samples from four of the remains will be preserved in Tasmania under the joint control of the NHM and the TAC. These samples were extracted from the remains before the decision was taken to return them.
"We have to work with the TAC for a framework that allows scientists to have access [to the DNA samples]. We have no preconceptions about how that is going to work," Professor Lane told BBC News. "We have to work with the TAC for a framework that allows scientists to have access [to the DNA samples]. We have no preconceptions about how that is going to work," Professor Lane said.
Colonial historyColonial history
TAC representative Greg Brown told BBC News: "Now we have some power and say over what happens to it. Nothing can happen to the DNA samples unless it has the joint approval of the parties." TAC representative Greg Brown told BBC News: "Now we have some power and say over what happens. Nothing can happen to the DNA samples unless it has the joint approval of the parties.
"There are a lot of sensitivities over the use of DNA by our people and we want to have control over what happens with that." He could not comment on what types of research the TAC might find offensive, but said decisions would be made in consultation with the whole community."There are a lot of sensitivities over the use of DNA by our people and we want to have control over what happens with that." He could not comment on what types of research the TAC might find offensive, but said decisions would be made in consultation with the whole community.
Mr Brown added that aboriginal leaders believed the samples should eventually be buried.Mr Brown added that aboriginal leaders believed the samples should eventually be buried.
The TAC originally objected to the tests because they desecrated the beliefs of its community. The dead are said to be "souls in torment" until properly buried, according to aboriginal custom. The TAC objects to testing because it desecrates the beliefs of its community. The dead are said to be "souls in torment" until properly buried, according to aboriginal custom.
The Tasmanian materials were largely collected in the 19th century by George Augustus Robinson, who had been contracted by the colonial government of the day to clear lands by force for European settlers. The Tasmanian materials were largely collected in the 19th Century by George Augustus Robinson, who had been contracted by the colonial government of the day to clear lands by force for European settlers.
On his death, the remains were passed into the possession of other individuals and eventually deposited in UK institutions, and then gradually brought under the keeping of the Natural History Museum.On his death, the remains were passed into the possession of other individuals and eventually deposited in UK institutions, and then gradually brought under the keeping of the Natural History Museum.
Scientists in the UK say the Tasmanian remains could shed light on human evolution, and particularly on the colonisation of Australia.Scientists in the UK say the Tasmanian remains could shed light on human evolution, and particularly on the colonisation of Australia.
Tasmanian populations appear to have been isolated from mainland aboriginal Australians for 10,000 years until the arrival of Europeans in the 19th century. Tasmanian populations appear to have been isolated from mainland aboriginal Australians for 10,000 years until the arrival of Europeans in the 19th Century.
According to the TAC, there were around 8,000 Aboriginals in Tasmania when the British settled the island in 1802, but by 1850 there were just 47 left, after thousands were killed in massacres and or by disease brought in by the colonists.According to the TAC, there were around 8,000 Aboriginals in Tasmania when the British settled the island in 1802, but by 1850 there were just 47 left, after thousands were killed in massacres and or by disease brought in by the colonists.