This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/uk-15801515

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
GPs should 'not sign off long-term sick' GPs should 'not sign off long-term sick'
(about 1 hour later)
People should be signed off for long-term sickness by an independent assessment service not GPs, a government-backed review says.People should be signed off for long-term sickness by an independent assessment service not GPs, a government-backed review says.
The review into dealing with long-term sickness at work also suggests tax breaks for firms which employ people who suffer from long-term conditions. The review also suggests tax breaks for firms which employ people who suffer from long-term conditions.
It is estimated the moves would mean 20% of the people currently on sickness absence would return to work. It is estimated the changes would send 20% of those off sick back to work.
A Department for Work and Pensions spokesman said: "The government is committed to supporting more people with health conditions to work."
Around 300,000 people a year are absent from work due to long-term sickness.Around 300,000 people a year are absent from work due to long-term sickness.
The review also calls for a new government backed job-brokering service, to find work for people cannot stay in their current job because of their condition.The review also calls for a new government backed job-brokering service, to find work for people cannot stay in their current job because of their condition.
A survey suggested 77% of GPs had admitted they signed people off sick for reasons other than their physical health, the report authors told the BBC.A survey suggested 77% of GPs had admitted they signed people off sick for reasons other than their physical health, the report authors told the BBC.
The government asked Prof Carol Black and the former head of the British Chambers of Commerce David Frost to consider radical changes to deal with the human and financial cost of sickness absence in the workplace. The authors of the independent review believe that one in five of people currently on "the sick" could be back at work if their recommendations are accepted.
That is the kind of change that David Cameron and Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith want to see if they are to deal with a welfare dependency which they believe has spiralled out of control.
There's talk of tax incentives for firms to take on or retain staff with long-term conditions and government-backed help to find a more appropriate job for those who can no longer do what they have been doing could also be on offer.
Both the prime minister and Labour's Ed Miliband have talked recently about a "something for something" society.
The emphasis is on putting in if you want to get something out.
But there will be concern, particularly among the most vulnerable, especially those who suffer fluctuating illnesses, about how stringent and flexible any new assessment could be.
The government asked Professor Carol Black and the former head of the British Chambers of Commerce David Frost to consider radical changes to deal with the human and financial cost of sickness absence in the workplace.
Tax breaksTax breaks
If the recommendations are accepted people who are signed off sick would also be put on to job seekers allowance, instead of employment support allowance for a period of three months. If the recommendations are accepted people who are signed off sick would also be put on to Job Seekers' Allowance, instead of Employment Support Allowance, for a period of three months.
They would receive less money and have to prove they were looking for work.
Tax breaks for firms which employ people who suffer from long-term conditions are also being suggested.Tax breaks for firms which employ people who suffer from long-term conditions are also being suggested.
The DWP spokesman said: "The economy loses £15bn in lost economic output each year due to sickness absence and we cannot continue to foot this bill.
"But even more important is the impact of needless inactivity on people's lives, the damage to their aspirations and their health and the damage to their families and communities."
BBC political correspondent Robin Brant said the new service was likely to asses people "more quickly and more stringently".BBC political correspondent Robin Brant said the new service was likely to asses people "more quickly and more stringently".
The report authors estimate the changes could save taxpayers at least £350m each year.The report authors estimate the changes could save taxpayers at least £350m each year.