This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/business/6725587.stm

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Lords try to raise pension payout Lords vote to lift pension payout
(about 6 hours later)
Tony Blair and David Cameron have clashed on plans to increase payouts to those whose company pensions went bust. The government has failed to stop the House of Lords voting to increase the compensation given to some people whose company pension schemes have collapsed.
The House of Lords will vote on an amendment to the Pensions Bill that could lead to higher payouts from the Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS). By a majority of 55, the Lords have introduced an amendment to the Pensions Bill calling for higher payouts from the Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS).
The FAS was set up to compensate people who lost out when their pension schemes collapsed between 1997 and 2005.The FAS was set up to compensate people who lost out when their pension schemes collapsed between 1997 and 2005.
The amendment seeks to bring the level of FAS payouts up to that of the more recent Pension Protection Fund (PPF). The amendment is likely to be removed when the bill returns to the Commons.
Commons clash
Under the Lords' plans for a "lifeboat fund" for the FAS, its compensation would be increased to match the more recent Pension Protection Fund (PPF).
Earlier on Friday, Prime Minister Tony Blair and Opposition Leader David Cameron clashed over the issue at Prime Minister's Question Time.
Mr Cameron said it was imperative that the innocent victims of pension scheme collapses received more compensation.Mr Cameron said it was imperative that the innocent victims of pension scheme collapses received more compensation.
But Mr Blair replied that it would be "delusional" and "irresponsible" to promise pensioners additional benefits without being sure there was the money to pay for them.But Mr Blair replied that it would be "delusional" and "irresponsible" to promise pensioners additional benefits without being sure there was the money to pay for them.
In this year's Budget, the Government extended the scope of the FAS so that all 125,000 affected pension scheme members would be eligible to receive 80% of their "core" benefits, and increased its funding from £2bn to £8bn.In this year's Budget, the Government extended the scope of the FAS so that all 125,000 affected pension scheme members would be eligible to receive 80% of their "core" benefits, and increased its funding from £2bn to £8bn.
However the pension protection fund - which provides compensation for people whose pension schemes went bust since 2005 - pays out at a higher 90% level to those who have yet to retire. However the PPF - which provides compensation for people whose pension schemes went bust since 2005 - pays out at a higher 90% level to those who have yet to retire.
'Miserable' payouts'Miserable' payouts
Liberal Democrat peer Lord Oakeshott described the FAS as "miserable."Liberal Democrat peer Lord Oakeshott described the FAS as "miserable."
"It has only paid out £4m so far, although 125,000 people have been robbed of their pensions," he said."It has only paid out £4m so far, although 125,000 people have been robbed of their pensions," he said.
In April, a similar amendment was defeated in the House of Commons by 22 votes.In April, a similar amendment was defeated in the House of Commons by 22 votes.
Now, Lib Dem and Conservative peers are making another attempt to introduce the plan at the committee stage of the Bill.
Ros Altmann, a spokeswoman for the Pensions Action Group, said it was the responsibility of the Government to improve the FAS further.Ros Altmann, a spokeswoman for the Pensions Action Group, said it was the responsibility of the Government to improve the FAS further.
"The government said it had put in place laws which would make employer pension schemes completely safe and ensure that the employer had put enough money in to fund the pensions," she said."The government said it had put in place laws which would make employer pension schemes completely safe and ensure that the employer had put enough money in to fund the pensions," she said.
"The Government knew those laws wouldn't work but it kept pretending to the members of the schemes that the money was completely safe.""The Government knew those laws wouldn't work but it kept pretending to the members of the schemes that the money was completely safe."
Members of the Pensions Action Group plan to demonstrate in Parliament Square during the Lords debate.