This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/uk-politics-16539428

The article has changed 14 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Cameron hint over child benefit cuts for better-off Cameron hint over child benefit cuts for better-off
(about 3 hours later)
David Cameron has said the government is looking again at the impact on some families of its proposed changes to child benefit for the better-off.  
From April 2013, families where one parent earns more than about £44,000 a year are set to lose the benefit. David Cameron has hinted the government could alter controversial plans to scrap child benefit for some families.
Critics say the move would penalise families with one high earner. From April 2013, households where one parent earns more than about £44,000 a year are set to lose the benefit, but critics say the plans are unfair.
In a magazine interview, Mr Cameron acknowledged the changes could create a "cliff-edge" effect and the Treasury was examining their implementation.In a magazine interview, Mr Cameron acknowledged the changes could create a "cliff-edge" effect and the Treasury was examining their implementation.
However, Mr Cameron gave no indication that the policy - announced by Chancellor George Osborne in October 2010 - would be altered. But Treasury sources said there had been no change in policy.
Critics say the proposals would mean that some parents will lose thousands of pounds if their income rises above the 40% tax threshold - currently about £44,000, but due to fall to about £42,000 in 2013.
'Unfairness''Unfairness'
Campaigners say anomalies in the proposals would mean that some parents will lose thousands of pounds if their income rises above the 40% tax threshold, currently about £44,000 but due to fall to about £42,000 in 2013. A couple with three children could lose around £2,500 if one parent earned just a few pounds over the threshold - even if the other was unemployed. But a couple who both earn just under £44,000 a year each, and enjoy a total household income of more than £80,000, would keep all their benefit.
While a couple with three children could lose around £2,500 if one parent earns just a few pounds over the threshold, even if the other is unemployed, another couple where both parents each earn just under £44,000 and enjoy a total household income of more than £80,000 will keep all their benefit.
In an interview with The House Magazine, Mr Cameron suggested he did have some concerns over how the proposed changes were structured.In an interview with The House Magazine, Mr Cameron suggested he did have some concerns over how the proposed changes were structured.
"Some people say that's the unfairness of it, that you lose the child benefit if you have a higher-rate taxpayer in the family (but) two people below the level keep the benefit," he said."Some people say that's the unfairness of it, that you lose the child benefit if you have a higher-rate taxpayer in the family (but) two people below the level keep the benefit," he said.
"So, there's a threshold, a cliff-edge issue. We always said we would look at the steepness of the curve, we always said we would look at the way it's implemented and that remains the case. But again, I don't want to impinge on the chancellor's Budget." "So, there's a threshold, a cliff-edge issue. We always said we would look at the steepness of the curve, we always said we would look at the way it's implemented and that remains the case.
"But again, I don't want to impinge on the chancellor's Budget."
George Osborne will deliver his third Budget - where tax and spending changes are traditionally announced - in March.George Osborne will deliver his third Budget - where tax and spending changes are traditionally announced - in March.
Mr Osborne has defended the child benefit cut - which could save up to £1bn a year - as tough but necessary, saying those on higher incomes must contribute their share to helping cut the budget deficit.Mr Osborne has defended the child benefit cut - which could save up to £1bn a year - as tough but necessary, saying those on higher incomes must contribute their share to helping cut the budget deficit.
Labour have criticised the proposals, saying they have caused "huge anxiety" and that all families need support in tough times.Labour have criticised the proposals, saying they have caused "huge anxiety" and that all families need support in tough times.
Do you think the government should reassess the changes to child benefits? Would these welfare reform plans affect you? Send us your comments using the form below. Employment Minister Chris Grayling told the BBC's Newsnight he would be "surprised if we saw a major U-turn on child benefit".
"We always with every policy try to implement it in as sensible a way as possible, but I have heard nothing to suggest that we're about to change direction massively on child benefit," he said.
"The prime minister has said he will be careful and thoughtful how we do it and try and make changes as effectively and efficiently and fairly as possible."