This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/magazine-16552173

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
What is it like to be asexual? What is it like to be asexual?
(40 minutes later)
By Lucy Wallis BBC NewsBy Lucy Wallis BBC News
Twenty-one-year-old Jenni Goodchild does not experience sexual attraction, but in an increasingly sexualised society what is it like to be asexual?
"For me it basically just means that I don't look at people and think 'hmm yeah I'd have sex with you,' that just doesn't happen," says Jenni.
A student in Oxford, Jenni is one of the estimated 1% of people in the UK who identify themselves as asexual. Asexuality is described as an orientation, unlike celibacy which is a choice.
"People say 'well if you've not tried it, then how do you know?'" says Jenni.
"Well if you're straight have you tried having sex with somebody you know of the same sex as you? How do you know you wouldn't enjoy that? You just know that if you're not interested in it, you're not interested in it, regardless of having tried it or not."
The Asexual Visibility and Education Network (AVEN), the main online hub for the asexual community, stresses that emotional needs vary widely in the asexual community, just as they do in the "sexual" community.
There is a difference, for instance between aromantic asexuals and romantic asexuals, says sociologist Mark Carrigan, from the University of Warwick.
Aromantic or romantic?
"[Aromantic asexuals] don't have any romantic attractions, so in many cases they don't want to be touched, they don't want any physical intimacy," says Carrigan.
"[Romantic asexuals] don't experience sexual attraction, but they do experience romantic attraction. So they will look at someone and they won't respond sexually to them, but they might want to get closer to them, to find out more about them, to share things with them."
This is true of Jenni who is heteroromantic, and although having no interest in sex, is still attracted to people, and is in a relationship with 22-year-old Tim. Tim, however, is not asexual.
"A lot of people actually ask if I am being selfish and keeping him in a relationship that he won't get anything he wants [from] and he should go and date somebody like him, but he seems quite happy, so I'd say I'd leave that up to him," says Jenni.
Tim is enjoying spending time with and getting to know Jenni by focusing on the romantic aspects of their relationship.
"The first time that Jenni mentioned in conversation that she was asexual, my initial thought was 'hmm that's kind of odd'," says Tim, "but then I did know enough not to make assumptions about what that meant.
"I have never been obsessed with sex. I've not been one to have to go out at night and have to have someone to have sex with, because that's what people do… so I'm not all that concerned about it".
Jenni's relationship with Tim does have a physical side, as they cuddle and kiss to express their affection for each other.
Asexuality has been the subject of very few scientific studies which has led to speculation about why some people feel no sexual attraction.
"There are people who definitely view it as a disorder and are like 'oh if we give you these pills we can fix it'. Or people who ask you 'have you had your hormones checked', as though that's the obvious solution," says Jenni.
"And then you get people who go one step worse, and I have been asked before if I had been molested as a child, which is not an appropriate question to ask somebody to be honest, and also I haven't been. It was the assumption that 'hey you have something wrong with you, clearly you were molested as a child' is just such a terrible attitude to have."
Carrigan suggests that the lack of scientific research is tied in with the fact there was not really an asexual community until the launch of AVEN.
"Until there were people who were defining themselves as asexual, which didn't really happen until 2001, there wasn't really an object to study," says Mark.
Asexuality is distinct from the condition of people who lack sexual desire but find that problematic.
"There has been lots of research on hypoactive sexual desire disorder, which is classified as a personality disorder, and it is if you do not experience sexual attraction and it's causing you suffering. So lots of people who later came to be defined as asexual either were or might have been defined as having this condition."
Although asexuals do sometimes experience discrimination in society, Carrigan says it is different from the "outright phobia" that lesbian and gay people are sometimes subject to.
"It's more about marginalisation because people genuinely don't understand asexuality," says Mark.
"Fifty or 60 years ago would anyone have actually felt the need to define themselves as asexual or would society have just accepted them not engaging in sexual behaviour? I think there has been quite a profound change.
"The 'sexual revolution' has been a hugely valuable change in how we deal with sex and how we think about it as a society. Research has left me with a sense that there is a degree of oversexualisation in society, the fact that people just don't get asexuality."
Relationship, sex and behaviour expert Dr Pam Spurr admits not receiving many inquiries about asexuality.
"In the few times as an agony aunt or in my other work I have had questions about it, people often feel incredibly secretive about it because it's so rare," says Spurr.
She says people feel comfortable talking about high and low sex drives, but that asexuality itself is not a subject that is widely discussed.
The question that fascinates Carrigan is the future effect of a visible asexual community on people who are not asexual.
"For instance there wasn't a concept of heterosexuality before there were homosexuals," says Carrigan. "It was only when there were people calling themselves homosexuals that it made sense for anyone to think of themselves as heterosexual."
"If it is true that up to 1% of the population are asexual and more people are aware of them, will that change how 'sexual' people think about themselves, because there is not really a good word to refer to people who aren't asexual."
Below is a selection of your comments
It is an interesting concept - I consider myself as straight but I don't have sexual desires and watching "sexual" films does not help either. It's just one of those things, really - one day I will want to get married and have children but being an asexual is just a temporary measure, I'm sure, among young people.It is an interesting concept - I consider myself as straight but I don't have sexual desires and watching "sexual" films does not help either. It's just one of those things, really - one day I will want to get married and have children but being an asexual is just a temporary measure, I'm sure, among young people.
John Price, Bangor, WalesJohn Price, Bangor, Wales
Although I don't doubt there is a biological basis for some of these people, there certainly must be cases in which psychological issues are the cause.Although I don't doubt there is a biological basis for some of these people, there certainly must be cases in which psychological issues are the cause.
Eric, FranceEric, France
I spent years convinced that I was the only person who found our oversexualised world confusing. There is so much out there that I just don't get! But finding out about asexuality made me feel better about myself and at least now I know why I don't react in the same way most other people do. It was a great relief. While this is a great article, you don't address the fact that many asexual people do have sexual relationships, and enjoy sex. Just because we don't feel sexual attracted to people or consider them "hot" doesnt mean we can't like sex and share it with our partners. We just don't fall in "lust" with people - which isnt such a bad thing really!I spent years convinced that I was the only person who found our oversexualised world confusing. There is so much out there that I just don't get! But finding out about asexuality made me feel better about myself and at least now I know why I don't react in the same way most other people do. It was a great relief. While this is a great article, you don't address the fact that many asexual people do have sexual relationships, and enjoy sex. Just because we don't feel sexual attracted to people or consider them "hot" doesnt mean we can't like sex and share it with our partners. We just don't fall in "lust" with people - which isnt such a bad thing really!
El, CardiffEl, Cardiff
I have been in contact with two people who are asexual and both in a relationship , the one thing that struck me was that they were just as happy as anyone else but most importantly would be less likely to have an affair so therefore their relationships could be more likely to last forever due to The lack of sexual attraction to other people .I have been in contact with two people who are asexual and both in a relationship , the one thing that struck me was that they were just as happy as anyone else but most importantly would be less likely to have an affair so therefore their relationships could be more likely to last forever due to The lack of sexual attraction to other people .
Phyll, Worthing, United KingdomPhyll, Worthing, United Kingdom
It is bound to happen - that is what genetic diversity is about. Of the infinite variations that can result, asexuality is one of them.It is bound to happen - that is what genetic diversity is about. Of the infinite variations that can result, asexuality is one of them.
Murthy, Hyderabad, IndiaMurthy, Hyderabad, India
I think I understand asexuality in a way few others can. I have just the oppsite problem. Because of a spinal cord injury I can't feel anything sexual but I still have the urge. That's not the same as voluntary abstenence. I think after 35 years of sensory loss I understand a sex drive better than a person who doesn't have one.I think I understand asexuality in a way few others can. I have just the oppsite problem. Because of a spinal cord injury I can't feel anything sexual but I still have the urge. That's not the same as voluntary abstenence. I think after 35 years of sensory loss I understand a sex drive better than a person who doesn't have one.
Grant Johnston, Chico, CA USAGrant Johnston, Chico, CA USA
I think it's a real shame that asexuals feel the need to have to discount the possibility that some of them at least will be the product of low levels of sex hormones, shyness genes, culture and experience as opposed to a purely genetic basis (which I've no doubt exists). There should neither be shame, nor confusion in this.I think it's a real shame that asexuals feel the need to have to discount the possibility that some of them at least will be the product of low levels of sex hormones, shyness genes, culture and experience as opposed to a purely genetic basis (which I've no doubt exists). There should neither be shame, nor confusion in this.
Jason Alan Ward, Welwyn Garden City, HertfordshireJason Alan Ward, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire
When I was about 13, back in the late 1950s, I rather deliberately convinced myself that I was basically asexual. At the time, it made sense - it enabled me to ignore the fact that I didn't have any particular sexual enthusiasm regarding girls (I was a nerd anyway) and I could likewise ignore any thoughts that popped up regarding boys. This entirely self-generated protective mechanism lasted, interestingly, for over 20 years until it finally got broken down in the early 1980s by my willingness to accept that I was in fact attracted sexually entirely to men. In retrospect, it may seem that I was lying to myself; but at the time, I can assure you that it felt quite comfortable as a way out of an inexpressible dilemma; remember, there were virtually no sources of information about viable homosexuality available to kids in the 1950s. At any rate, I survived, and have since recovered my sexuality. But I certainly respect the asexual option, if it's clearly explored.When I was about 13, back in the late 1950s, I rather deliberately convinced myself that I was basically asexual. At the time, it made sense - it enabled me to ignore the fact that I didn't have any particular sexual enthusiasm regarding girls (I was a nerd anyway) and I could likewise ignore any thoughts that popped up regarding boys. This entirely self-generated protective mechanism lasted, interestingly, for over 20 years until it finally got broken down in the early 1980s by my willingness to accept that I was in fact attracted sexually entirely to men. In retrospect, it may seem that I was lying to myself; but at the time, I can assure you that it felt quite comfortable as a way out of an inexpressible dilemma; remember, there were virtually no sources of information about viable homosexuality available to kids in the 1950s. At any rate, I survived, and have since recovered my sexuality. But I certainly respect the asexual option, if it's clearly explored.
JD Eveland, Los Angeles, CA, USAJD Eveland, Los Angeles, CA, USA