This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/5410472.stm

The article has changed 18 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Straw asks women for veil rethink Straw asks women for veil rethink
(40 minutes later)
Muslim women in the UK who wear full veils make "better, positive relations" between communities "more difficult", Commons leader Jack Straw has said. Muslim women in the UK who wear full veils make "better, positive relations" between communities more difficult, Commons leader Jack Straw has said.
Concealing a face was "a visible statement of separation and of difference", the Blackburn MP wrote in the Lancashire Evening Telegraph. Failing to show the mouth and nose was "a visible statement of separation and of difference", the MP wrote in the Lancashire Evening Telegraph.
He said he now asks women who have meetings with him to remove their veils so they can truly talk "face-to-face". Now he asks women who meet him to take off veils to truly talk "face-to-face".
"My concerns could be misplaced, but I think there is an issue here," he said. But the Islamic Human Rights Commission claimed the Blackburn MP's request would cause selective discrimination.
The MP for Blackburn - where Muslims make up about a quarter of the population - said: "The value of a meeting, as opposed to a letter or phone call, is that you can - almost literally - see what the other person means, and not just hear what they say." "It is astonishing that someone as experienced and senior as Jack Straw does not realise that the job of an elected representative is to represent the interests of the constituency, not to selectively discriminate on the basis of religion," said commission chairman Massoud Shadjareh.
And Halima Hussain from Muslim Public Affairs Committee asked: "Who is Jack Straw to comment on negative symbols within a religion that is not his own?
"The point is these women have chosen to wear the veil and it's their own decision. It's not something that has been forced upon them," she told BBC News 24.
"These are not oppressed women. I don't think he's right to say this at all."
'Provides some separation'
Mr Straw, who is the MP for a Lancashire town where Muslims make up about a quarter of the population, said: "The value of a meeting, as opposed to a letter or phone call, is that you can - almost literally - see what the other person means, and not just hear what they say."
What I'm saying on the other side is, would those people who do wear the veil think about the implications for community relations, Jack StrawUK Cabinet ministerWhat I'm saying on the other side is, would those people who do wear the veil think about the implications for community relations, Jack StrawUK Cabinet minister
Mr Straw later told BBC Radio Lancashire that this was "an issue that needs to be discussed because in our society, we are able to relate, particularly to strangers, by being able to read their faces, and if you can't read people's faces, that does provide some separation". Later he told BBC Radio Lancashire that this was "an issue that needs to be discussed because in our society, we are able to relate, particularly to strangers, by being able to read their faces, and if you can't read people's faces, that does provide some separation".
He said he understood why some women wanted to be covered, citing a recent meeting with a constituent who "said she felt more comfortable when she was outside wearing the veil and she was less troubled by people".He said he understood why some women wanted to be covered, citing a recent meeting with a constituent who "said she felt more comfortable when she was outside wearing the veil and she was less troubled by people".
"What I'm saying on the other side is, would those people who do wear the veil think about the implications for community relations," he said."What I'm saying on the other side is, would those people who do wear the veil think about the implications for community relations," he said.
Mr Straw was home secretary from 1997 to 2001, and then foreign secretary until 2005, a period which included the build-up to, and invasion of, Iraq.
He said he always made sure he had a female colleague in the room when asking someone to show their mouth and nose - and his constituents had so far always agreed when he had asked.
'Selective discrimination''Selective discrimination'
Mr Straw was home secretary from 1997 to 2001, and then foreign secretary until 2005, a period which included the build-up to, and invasion of Iraq. Mr Straw also said he defended the right for women to wear headscarves - which, he said, was the issue in France which had led to recent controversy.
He said he always made sure he had a female colleague in the room when asking someone to remove their veil - and his constituents had so far always agreed when he had asked. "My concerns could be misplaced, but I think there is an issue here," he said.
Mr Straw also said he defended the right for women to wear headscarfs - which, he said, was the issue in France which had led to recent controversy. The chairman of the Council of Lancashire Mosques, Hamid Kureshi, accused Mr Straw of "giving a small point a very big importance".
It is astonishing... Jack Straw does not realise that the job of an elected representative is to represent the interests of the constituency, not to selectively discriminate on the basis of religion Massoud ShadjarehIslamic Human Rights Commission Jack Straw is putting them into a very awkward position by compromising the faith they believe in and that is ill-placed Hamid KureshiCouncil of Lancashire Mosques
The chairman of the Islamic Human Rights Commission claimed his request would lead to "selective" discrimination. "Those who want to remove their veil can do so," he told BBC Radio Five Live.
"It is astonishing that someone as experienced and senior as Jack Straw does not realise that the job of an elected representative is to represent the interests of the constituency, not to selectively discriminate on the basis of religion," said Massoud Shadjareh. "But what we are saying is there will be many who will say, 'We don't want to remove our veil.'
But Dr Daud Abdullah of the Muslim Council of Britain said it was up to individual Muslim women whether to wear the veil, adding he understood the matter "does cause some discomfort to non-Muslim". "And Jack Straw is putting them into a very awkward position by compromising the faith they believe in and that is ill-placed."
But Dr Daud Abdullah of the Muslim Council of Britain said it was up to individual Muslim women whether to wear the veil, adding he understood the matter "does cause some discomfort to non-Muslims".
"Even within the Muslim community the scholars have different views on this."Even within the Muslim community the scholars have different views on this.
"Our view is that if it is going to cause discomfort and that can be avoided then it can be done. The veil over the hair is obligatory.""Our view is that if it is going to cause discomfort and that can be avoided then it can be done. The veil over the hair is obligatory."